Automating handover in dynamic workflow environments

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1413, Issue , 1998, Pages 159-171

  Liu, Chengfei ^a   Orlowska, Maria E ^b   Li, Hui ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS; SPECIFICATION LANGUAGES; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

BUSINESS PROCESS MODELLING; BUSINESS REQUIREMENT; DYNAMIC WORKFLOW; EXECUTION INFORMATIONS; POLICY SPECIFICATION LANGUAGES; WORKFLOW INSTANCES; WORKFLOW MODELING; WORKFLOW TECHNOLOGY;

SPECIFICATIONS;

EID: 84961374509     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. J. Banerjee, W. Kim, H-J. Kim, and H. Korth. Semantics and implementation of schema evolution in object-oriented databases. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management o/Data, pages 311-322, 1987.
2. F. Casati, S. Ceri, B. Pernici, and G. Pozzi. Conceptual modeling of workflows. In Proceedings of O0-ER conference, pages 341-354. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1021, Springer, 1995.
3. F. Casati, S. Ceri, B. Pernici, and G. Pozzi. Workflow evolution. In Proceedings of the 15th ER Int. Conf., pages 438-455. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1157, Springer, 1996.
4. Forte. Forte Conductor Process Development Guide. Forte Software, Inc., 1994.
5. Butler Group. Work flow: Integrating the Enterprise, June 1996.
6. InConcert. InConcert Technical Product Overview. InConcert Inc., January 1997.
7. M. Jaccheri and R. Conradi. Techniques for process model evolution in EPOS. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 19(12):1145-1156, December 1993.
8. D. Kuo, M. Lawley, C. Liu, and M. Orlowska. A general model for nested transactional workflows. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Advanced Transaction Models and Architectures, pages 18-35, 1996.
9. F. Leymann. Supporting business transactions via partial backward recovery in workflow management systems. In Proceedings of BTW'95, pages 51-70, 1995.
10. C. Liu and M. Orlowska. Confirmation: Increasing resource availability for transactional workflows. Technical report, Distributed Systems Technology Centre, September 1997.
11. Workflow Management Coalition Members. Glossary - A Workflow Management Coalition Specification. Workflow Management Coalition, November 1994. Softcopy available via: http://www.aiai.ed.ac.uk/project/wfmc/.
12. M. Rusinkiewicz and A. Sheth. Specification and execution of transactional workflows. In W. Kim, editor, Modern Database Systems: The Object Model, Interoperability, and Beyond. Addison-Wesley, 1994.
13. W. Sadiq and M. E. Orlowska. On correctness issues in conceptual modeling of workflows. In Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Information System, 1997.
14. A. Sheth and K. Kochut. Workflow applications to research agenda: Scalable and dynamic workflow coordination and collabration systems. In Proceedings of the NATO ASI on Workflow Management Systems and Interoperability, August 1997.
15. A.H.M. ter Hofstede, Maria E. Orlowska, and J. Rajapakse. Verification problems in conceptual workflow specification. In Proceedings of the 15th ER Int. Conf., pages 73-88. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1157, Springer, 1996.
16. R. Zicari. A framework for schema updates in an object-oriented database systems. In Proceeding of 7th International Conference on Data Engineering, pages 2-13, 1991.