Improving tobacco-free advocacy on college campuses: A novel strategy to aid in the understanding of student perceptions about policy proposals

Journal of American College Health

Volumn 62, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 498-505

  Niemeier, Brandi S ^a   Chapp, Christopher B ^b   Henley, Whitney B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN WHITEWATER   (United States)

^b ST OLAF COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

administration; community health; health education; other drugs; tobacco policy; tobacco free campus

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONSUMER ADVOCACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; POLICY; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARDS; STUDENT; TOBACCO; UNIVERSITY; UTILIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONSUMER ADVOCACY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY; PERCEPTION; STUDENTS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TOBACCO PRODUCTS; UNIVERSITIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84961353045     PISSN: 07448481     EISSN: 19403208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2014.925456     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Rigotti NA, Lee J, Wechsler H. US college students' use of tobacco products: results of a national survey. JAMA. 2000; 284:699-705. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.6.699.
2. Harbison PA, Whitman MV. Barriers associated with implementing a campus-wide smoke-free policy. Health Educ. 2008;108:321-331.
3. United States Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS), National Prevention Council. Tobacco Free Living. Available at: http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/initiatives/prevention/strategy/tobacco-free.pdf. Published 2010. Accessed May 5, 2013.
4. Berg CJ, Lessard L, Parelkar PP, et al. College student reactions to smoking bans in public, on campus and at home. Health Educ Res. 2011;26:106-118.
5. American Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation. Smokefree and tobacco-free U.S. and tribal colleges and universities. Available at: http://www.no-smoke.org/pdf/smokefreecollegesuniversities. pdf. Published 2014. Accessed January 7, 2014.
6. United States Department of Education. Digest of education statistics 2012. Available at: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014015-1.pdf. Published 2013. Accessed January 7, 2014.
7. Loukas A, Garcia MR, Gottlieb NH. Texas college students' opinions of no-smoking policies, secondhand smoke, and smoking in public places. J Am Coll Health. 2006;55:27-32.
8. Cho Y, DeVaney SA. Understanding college students' opinions on a smoking policy. Int J Consum Stud. 2010;34:388-393.
9. Seo D, Macy JT, Torabi MR, Middlestadt SE. The effect of a smoke-free campus policy on college students' smoking behaviors and attitudes. Prev Med. 2011;53:347-352.
10. James DCS, Chen WW, Sheu J. Comparison of three tobacco survey methods with college students: a case study. Int Electron J Health Educ. 2005;8:119-124.
11. Thompson DL, Oomen-Early J, Armstrong S, Lalwani P. College students' perceptions of smoke-free campus policies: implications for policy development and implementation. Tenn Assoc Health Phys Educ Recreat Dance. 2012;80:8-12.
12. Zaller J. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
13. Nelson TE, Clawson RA, Oxley ZM. Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. Am Polit Sci Rev. 1997;91:567-583.
14. Druckman JN. Priming the vote: campaign effects in a U.S. Senate election. Polit Psychol. 2004;25:577-594.
15. Chapp CB. Religious Rhetoric and American Politics: The Endurance of Civil Religion in Electoral Campaigns. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2012.
16. Toll BA, Salovey P, O'Malley SS, Mazure CM, Latimer AL, McKee SA. Message framing for smoking cessation: the interaction of risk perceptions and gender. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009;10:195-200.
17. Chong D, Druckman JN. Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2007;101:637-655.
18. Druckman JN, Bolsen T. Framing, motivated reasoning, and opinions about emergent technologies. J Commun. 2011;61:659-688.
19. Pennebaker JW, Francis ME, Booth RJ. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC): LIWC2007. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2007.
20. Pennebaker JW. Putting stress into words: health, linguistic, and therapeutic implications. Behav Res Ther. 1993; 31:539-548.
21. Robertson K, Doig A. An empirical investigation of variations in real-estate marketing language over a market cycle. Housing Theory Soc. 2010;27:178-189. doi: 10.1080/14036090903159994.
22. Oegema D, Wang S, Kleinnijenhuis J. Dynamics of online discussions about politics: a function of structural network properties, mass media attention or emotional utterances? Paper presented at Web Science Conference; Raleigh, NC; April 26, 2010.
23. Slatcher RB, Chung CK, Pennebaker JW, Stone LD. Winning words: individual differences in linguistic style among U.S. presidential and vice presidential candidates. J Res Pers. 2007;41:63-75. doi: 10.1016/jrp.2006.01.006.
24. Pennebaker JW. The Secret Life of Pronouns: What Our Words Say About Us. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press; 2011.
25. Brader T. Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2006.
26. Menard, S. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995.
27. University of Wisconsin-Whitewater. Spring 2013 enrollment statistics. Available at: http://www.uww.edu/Documents/registrar/Reports-Statistics/Enrollment/Spring2013.pdf. Published 2013. Accessed January 18, 2004.
28. Druckman JN, Chong D. Counterframing effects. J Polit. 2013;75:1-16.