Building a gold standard to construct search filters: A case study with biomarkers for oral cancer

Journal of the Medical Library Association

Volumn 103, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 22-30

  Frazier, John J ^a   Stein, Corey D ^b   Tseytlin, Eugene ^b   Bekhuis, Tanja ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TUMOR MARKER;

BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; CLASSIFICATION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL SUBJECT HEADINGS; MEDLINE; MOUTH NEOPLASMS; PROCEDURES; PUBLICATION; STANDARD; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

BIOMARKERS, TUMOR; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL SUBJECT HEADINGS; MEDLINE; MOUTH NEOPLASMS; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; REFERENCE STANDARDS;

EID: 84961292161     PISSN: 15365050     EISSN: 15589439     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.103.1.005     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Pub-Med.gov [Internet]. US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health [cited 17 Feb 2014]., http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/.
2. US National Library of Medicine. Fact sheet: MEDLINE [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: US National Institutes of Health [rev. 7 May 2014; cited 4 Jun 2014]., http://www.nlm.nih. gov/pubs/factsheets/medline.html.
3. Boissier MC. Benchmarking biomedical publications worldwide. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013 Sep;52(9):1545-6.
4. Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound prognostic studies in MEDLINE: an analytic survey. BMC Med. 2004 Jun 9;2:23.
5. Haynes RB, McKibbon KA, Wilczynski NL, Walter SD, Werre SR. Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from Medline: analytical survey. BMJ. 2005 May 21;330(7501):1179.
6. Jenkins M. Evaluation of methodological search filters-a review. Health Info Lib J. 2004 Sep;21(3):148-63.
7. Sampson M, Zhang L, Morrison A, Barrowman NJ, Clifford TJ, Platt RW, Klassen TP, Moher D. An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:33.
8. Wilczynski NL, Morgan D, Haynes RB. An overview of the design and methods for retrieving high-quality studies for clinical care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005;5:20.
9. Mathet Y, Widlocher A, Fort K, Francois C, Galibert O, Grouin C, Kahn J, Rosset S, Zweigenbaum P. Manual corpus annotation: giving meaning to the evaluation metrics. International Conference on Computational Lingustics; 2012.
10. Pustejovsky J, Stubbs A. Natural language annotation for machine learning. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media; 2012.
11. Bird S, Klein E, Loper E. Natural language processing with Python. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly; 2009.
12. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CE, Bouquot JE. Oral and maxillofacial pathology. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Saunders/ Elsevier; 2009.
13. Shaw AT, Yeap BY, Solomon BJ, Riely GJ, Gainor J, Engelman JA, Shapiro GI, Costa DB, Ou SH, Butaney M, Salgia R, Maki RG, Varella-Garcia M, Doebele RC, Bang YJ, Kulig K, Selaru P, Tang Y, Wilner KD, Kwak EL, Clark JW, Iafrate AJ, Camidge DR. Effect of crizotinib on overall survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring ALK gene rearrangement: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Oct;12(11):1004-12.
14. Meric-BernstamF, Farhangfar C, Mendelsohn J, Mills GB. Building a personalized medicine infrastructure at a major cancer center. J Clin Oncol. 2013 May 20;31(15):1849-57.
15. McShane LM, Hayes DF. Publication of tumor marker research results: the necessity for complete and transparent reporting. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 1;30(34):4223-32.
16. Pratheepa L, Pratibha R, Sherlin HJ, Anuja N, Premkumar P. Expression of emerging novel tumor markers in oral squamous cell carcinoma and their clinical and pathological correlation to determine the prognosis and usefulness as a therapeutic target: a systematic review. J Natural Sciences Res. 2012;2(1)
17. Choong MK, Tsafnat G. The implications of biomarker evidence for systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:176.
18. Elsevier. EMBASE [Internet]. Elsevier [cited 8 Jun 2014]., http://www.elsevier.com/online-tools/embase.
19. EBSCO. Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts (LISTA) [Internet]. EBSCO; 2014 [cited 8 Jun 2014]., http://www.ebscohost.com/academic/library-information-science-and-technology-abstracts.
20. InterTASC Information Specialists' Sub-Group (ISSG). ISSG search filters resource: the InterTASC Information Specialists' Sub-Group search filter resource [Internet]. The Sub-Group [cited 22 May 2014]., http://sites.google.com/ a/york.ac.uk/issg-search-filters-resource/home.
21. US National Library of Medicine. Medical Subject Headings: MeSH browser [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: US National Institutes of Health; 2014 [cited 14 Feb 2014]., http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/2014/mesh_browser/ MBrowser.html.
22. van de Glind EM, van Munster BC, Spijker R, Scholten RJ, Hooft L. Search filters to identify geriatric medicine in Medline. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 May-Jun;19(3):468-72.
23. Geersing GJ, Bouwmeester W, Zuithoff P, Spijker R, Leeflang M, Moons KG. Search filters for finding prognostic and diagnostic prediction studies in Medline to enhance systematic reviews. PLOS One. 2012;7(2):e32844.
24. Yao X, Wilczynski NL, Walter SD, Haynes RB. Sample size determination for bibliographic retrieval studies. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008;8:43.
25. EndNote v.X6 [computer program]. Thomson Reuters.
26. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74.
27. Wilczynski NL, McKibbon KA, Walter SD, Garg AX, Haynes RB. MEDLINE clinical queries are robust when searching in recent publishing years. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Mar 1;20(2):363-8.
28. Wilczynski NL, McKibbon KA, Haynes RB. Response to Glanville et al.: how to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on [letter to the editor]. J Med Lib Assoc. 2007 Apr;95(2):117-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10. 3163/1536-5050.95.2.117.
29. Glanville J, Lefebvre C. Authors' response [letter to the editor]. J Med Lib Assoc. 2007 Apr;95(2):119-20.
30. Funk ME, Reid CA. Indexing consistency in MEDLINE. Bull Med Lib Assoc. 1983 Apr;71(2):176-83.
31. Bekhuis T, Demner-Fushman D, Crowley RS. Comparative effectiveness research designs: an analysis of terms and coverage in Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and Emtree. J Med Lib Assoc. 2013 Apr;101(2):92-100. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.101.2.004.
32. Medelyan O, Witten IH. Measuring inter-indexer consistency using a thesaurus. Proceedings of the 6th Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and the IEEE Computer Society (IEEE-CS) Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM. 2006:274-5.