Rangeland ecosystem services: Shifting focus from supply to reconciling supply and demand

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 44-51

  Yahdjian, Laura ^a   Sala, Osvaldo E ^b   Havstad, Kris M ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; RANGELAND; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84961287978     PISSN: 15409295     EISSN: 15409309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/140156     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Anadón JD, Sala OE, Turner BL, and Bennett EM. 2014. Effect of woody-plant encroachment on livestock production in North and South America. P Natl Acad Sci USA 111:12948-53.
2. Bennett EM, Peterson GD, and Gordon LJ. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12:1394-404.
3. BLM (Bureau of Land Management). 2014, www.blm.gov/public-land-statistics/index.htm and http://rangenet.org/tools/blmgrazing/. Viewed 22 May 2014.
4. Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J, et al. 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. P Natl Acad Sci USA 106:1305-12.
5. Castro A, Martín-López B, García-Llórente M, et al. 2011. Social references regarding the delivery of ecosystem services in a semiarid Mediterranean region. J Arid Environ 75:1201-08.
6. Cordell HK. 2012. Outdoor recreation trends and futures: a technical document supporting the Forest Service. Asheville, NC: US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station.
7. Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, et al. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253-60.
8. Daily GC (Ed). 1997. Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
9. de Chazal J, Quétier F, Lavorel S, and Van Doom A. 2008. Including multiple differing stakeholder values into vulnerability assessments of socio-ecological systems. Global Environ Chang 18:508-20.
10. Estell RE, Havstad KM, Cibils AF, et al. 2012. Increasing shrub use by livestock in a world with less grass. Rangeland Ecol Manag 65:553-62.
11. Estell RE, Havstad KM, Cibils AF, et al. 2014. The changing role of shrubs in rangeland-based livestock production systems: can shrubs increase our forage supply? Rangelands 36:25-31.
12. FAO (UN Food and Agriculture Organization). 2003. World agriculture: towards 2015/2030. London, UK: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
13. FAO (UN Food and Agriculture Organization). 2009. The state of food and agriculture: livestock in the balance. Rome, Italy: FAO.
14. Gómez-Baggethun E, De Groot R, Lomas PL, and Montes C. 2010. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecol Econ 69:1209-18.
15. Havstad KM, Peters DP, Skaggs R, et al. 2007. Ecological services to and from rangelands of the United States. Ecol Econ 64:261-68.
16. Kauffman JB and Pyke DA. 2001. Range ecology, global livestock influences. In: Levin S (Ed). Encyclopedia of biodiversity. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17. Lamarque P, Tappeiner U, Turner C, et al. 2011. Stakeholder perceptions of grassland ecosystem services in relation to knowl-edge on soil fertility and biodiversity. Reg Environ Change 11:791-804.
18. MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
19. Martín-López B, Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llórente M, et al. 2012. Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS ONE 7:e38970.
20. Nelson GC, Bennett E, Berhe AA, et al. 2005. Drivers of change in ecosystem condition and services. In: Carpenter SR, et al. (Eds). Ecosystems and human well-being, volume 2: scenarios. Washington, DC: Island Press.
21. Newcome J, Provins A, Johns H, et al. 2005. The economic, social and ecological value of ecosystem services: a literature review. Final report prepared for The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). London, UK: EFTEC.
22. NSRE (National Survey on Recreation and the Environment). 2002. National Survey on Recreation and the Environment: 2000-2002. Athens, GA and Knoxville, TN: The Interagency National Survey Consortium.
23. Poulter B, Frank D, Ciáis P, et al. 2014. Contribution of semi-arid ecosystems to interannual variability of the global carbon cycle. Nature 509:600-03.
24. Quétier F, Rivoal F, Marty P, et al. 2010. Social representations of an alpine grassland landscape and socio-political discourses on rural development. Reg Environ Change 10:119-30.
25. Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, and Bennett EM. 2010. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. P Natl Acad Sci USA 107:5242-47.
26. Reynolds JF, Smith DMS, Lambin EF, et al. 2007. Global desertification: building a science for dryland development. Science 316:847-51.
27. Sala OE and Paruelo JM. 1997. Ecosystem services in grasslands. In: Daily GC (Ed). Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
28. Tallis H and Polasky S. 2011. Assessing multiple ecosystem services: an integrated tool for the real world. In: Kareiva P, Tallis H, Ricketts TH, et al. (Eds). Natural capital: theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
29. Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, and Befort BL. 2011. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. P Natl Acad Sci USA 108:20260-64.
30. Tschakert P. 2007. Environmental services and poverty reduction: options for smallholders in the Sahel. Agr Syst 94:75-86.
31. USA Trade Online. 2014. uhttps://usatrade.census.gov/. Viewed 20 May 2014.
32. Vitousek PM, Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich AH, and Matson PA. 1986. Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis. BioScience 36:368-73.
33. Zhen L, Ochirbat B, Lv Y, et al. 2010. Comparing patterns of ecosystem service consumption and perceptions of range management between ethnic herders in Inner Mongolia and Mongolia. Environ Res Lett 5:015001.