A lived-experience investigation of narratives: recycled drinking water

International Journal of Water Resources Development

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 637-649

  Ching, Leong ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

lived experience methodology; Recycled drinking water; Singapore; water governance; water policy; yuck factor

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; POTABLE WATER; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER SUPPLY;

LIVED EXPERIENCE METHODOLOGY; SINGAPORE; WATER GOVERNANCE; WATER POLICIES; YUCK FACTOR;

WATER RECYCLING;

DRINKING WATER; METHODOLOGY; POLICY APPROACH; PSYCHOLOGY; RECYCLING; WATER RESOURCE; WATER SUPPLY;

SINGAPORE [SOUTHEAST ASIA];

EID: 84961206072     PISSN: 07900627     EISSN: 13600648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07900627.2015.1126235     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. J.Barnett,, H.Cooper,, & V.Senior, (2007). Belief in public efficacy, trust, and attitudes toward modern genetic science. Risk Analysis, 27(4), 921– 933.
2. R.M.Boylorn, (2008). As seen on TV: An autoethnographic reflection on race and reality television. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 25, 413– 433. 10.1080/15295030802327758
3. C.G.Brunk, (2006). Public knowledge, public trust: Understanding the ‘knowledge deficit’. Community Genetics, 9(3), 178– 183.
4. Channel News Asia. (2002, August 28). Thirsting for new sources. Singapore: Mediacorp.
5. Channel News Asia. (2014, March 24). CALIFORNIA: Singapore looks to California for lessons on water management [ News clip]. Singapore: Mediacorp.
6. Z.Chen,, H.H.Ngo,, & W.S.Guo, (2012). 2013. Risk control in recycled water schemes. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 43, 121127060944004. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2012.672085.
7. J.Clark, (2000). Beyond empathy: An ethnographic approach to cross-cultural social work practice. Unpublished manuscript, Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto.
8. B.D.de Casterlé,, S.T.Verhaeghe,, M.C.Kars,, A.Coolbrandt,, M.Stevens,, M.Stubbe, & M.Grypdonck, (2011). Researching lived experience in health care: Significance for care ethics. Nursing Ethics, 18, 232– 242. 10.1177/0969733010389253
9. J.de Jonge,, J.C.M.van Trijp,, I.A.van der Lans,, R.J.Renes,, & L.J.Frewer, (2008). How trust in institutions and organizations builds general consumer confidence in the safety of food: A decomposition of effects. Appetite, 51(2), 311– 317.
10. R.F.Durant, & J.S.Legge, (2005). Public opinion, risk perceptions, and genetically modified food regulatory policy: Reassessing the calculus of dissent among European citizens. European Union Politics, 6, 181– 200.
11. V.Eatough, & J.A.Smith, (2010). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In C.Willig & W.Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 179– 195). London, UK: SAGE Publications.
12. L.Finlay, (2011). Phenomenology for therapists. NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781119975144
13. J.Gill, & P.Liamputtong, (2009). ‘Walk a mile in my shoes’: Researching the lived experience of mothers of children with autism. Journal of Family Studies, 15, 309– 319. 10.5172/jfs.15.3.309
14. R.Grove-White,, P.Macnaghten,, S.Mayer,, & B.Wynne, (1997). Uncertain world: genetically modified organisms, food and public attitudes in Britain. Lancaster, UK: Centre for the Study of Environmental Change, Lancaster University.
15. W.Hattingh, (1977). Reclaimed water: A health hazard? Water S. A, 3, 104- 112.
16. D.E.Huffman,, A.L.Gennaccaro,, T.L.Berg,, G.Batzer,, & G.Widmer, (2006). Detection of infectious parasites in reclaimed water. Water Environment Research, 78(12), 2297– 2302. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/stable/25053635
17. M.Isaäcson, & A.R.Sayed, (1988). Health aspects of the use of recycled water in Windhoek, SWA/Namibia, 1974-1983. diarrhoeal diseases and the consumption of reclaimed water. South African Medical Journal = Suid-Afrikaanse Tydskrif Vir Geneeskunde, 73, 596.
18. M.Larkin, & A.Thompson, (2012). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In A.Thompson & D.Harper (Eds.), Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: a guide for students and practitioners (pp. 99– 116). Oxford, UK: John Wiley.
19. K.Leder,, M.Sinclair,, & J.O’Toole, (2007). Recycled water and human health effects. Australian Family Physician, 36, 998– 1000.
20. R.P.Lejano, & C.Leong, (2012). A hermeneutic approach to explaining and understanding public controversies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 793– 814.
21. C.Leong, (2015). A quantitative investigation of narratives: recycled drinking water. Water Policy, uncorrected proof, 1– 17.
22. C.Leong, & D.Yu, (2010). Turning the tide: Informal institutional change in water reuse. Water Policy, 12, 121– 134.
23. H.Lindsay,, C.MacGregor,, & M.Fry, (2014). The experience of living with chronic illness for the haemodialysis patient: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Sociology Review: The Journal of the Health Section of the Australian Sociological Association, 23(3), 232– 241.
24. A.Lindseth, & A.Norberg, (2004). A phenomenological hermeneutical method for researching lived experience. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 18, 145– 153. 10.1111/scs.2004.18.issue-2
25. T.Mapp, (2008). Understanding phenomenology: The lived experience. British Journal of Midwifery, 16, 308– 311. 10.12968/bjom.2008.16.5.29192
26. J.Marks,, B.Martin,, & M.Zadoroznyj, (2008). How Australians order acceptance of recycled water: National baseline data. Journal of Sociology, 44, 83– 99. 10.1177/1440783307085844
27. J.R.Phillips, (1993). Researching the lived experience: Visions of the whole experience. Nursing Science Quarterly, 6, 166– 167. 10.1177/089431849300600403
28. M.Po,, J.D.Kaercher,,& B.E.Nancarrow, (2003). CSIRO Land and Water (Dec 2003) Technical Report 54/03, 1– 39.
29. M.Po,, B.Nancarrow,, Z.Leviston,, N.Porter,, G.Syme,, & J.Kaercher, (2005). Predicting community behaviour in relation to wasterwater reuse: What drivers decisions to accept or reject?. Perth, Western Australia: CSIRO Land & Water.
30. S.H.Priest, (2001). Misplaced faith: Communication variables as predictors of encouragement for biotechnology development. Science Communication, 23(2), 97– 110.
31. S.H.Priest,, H.Bonfadelli,, & M.Rusanen, (2003). The “Trust gap” hypothesis: Predicting support for biotechnology across national cultures as a function of trust in actors. Risk Analysis, 23(4), 751– 766.
32. C.Rodriguez,, K.Linge,, P.Blair,, F.Busetti,, B.Devine,, P.Van Buynder,, & A.Cook, (2012). Recycled water: Potential health risks from volatile organic compounds and use of 1,4-dichlorobenzene as treatment performance indicator. Water Research, 46, 93– 106. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.10.032.
33. M.Rygaard,, H.J.Albrechtsen,, & P.J.Binning, (2009). Alternative water management and self-sufficient water supplies. London: IWA Publishing.
34. R.M.Saleth,, & A.Dinar, (2004). The institutional economics of water: a cross-country analysis of institutions and performance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
35. M.Siegrist, & G.Cvetkovich, (2000). Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis, 20(5), 713– 720.
36. J.A.Smith, (1996). Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychology & Health, 11, 261– 271.
37. J.A.Smith,, M.Jarman,, & M.Osborn, (1999). Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis. In M.Murray & K.Chamberlain (Eds.), Qualitative health psychology: theories and methods (pp. 218– 241). London: Sage.
38. Z.Sofoulis, (2005). Big water, everyday water: a sociotechnical perspective. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 19, 445– 463.
39. N.Stenekes,, H.K.Colebateh,, T.D.Waite,, & N.J.Ashbolt, (2006). Risk and governance in water recycling: Public acceptance revisited. Science, Technology and Human Values, 31, 107– 134. 10.1177/0162243905283636
40. Y.S.Tan,, T.J.Lee,, & K.Tan, (2009). Clean, green and blue: Singapore’s journey towards environmental and water sustainability. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
41. The New Paper. (2002, September 6). Nothing new about NEWater, really. The New Paper, p. 8.
42. The Straits Times (1966) 1.9 million Singaporeans. The Straits Times, 2 November 1966. Retrieved Febuary 10 2016 from: http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/straitstimes19661102.2.99.aspx
43. TODAY. (2002, September 6). NEWater an old idea. TODAY Newspaper, p. 9.
44. C.Tortajada, (2006). Water management in Singapore. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 22, 227– 240. 10.1080/07900620600691944
45. C.Tortajada,, Y.Joshi,, & A.K.Biswas, (2013). The Singapore water story: Sustainable development in an urban city state. London: Routledge.
46. Y.Truelove, (2011). (Re-) Conceptualizing water inequality in Delhi, India through a feminist political ecology framework. Geoforum, 42, 143– 152. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.004
47. UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). (2012). The United Nations World Water Development Report 4 (WWDR4). Paris: UN-Water.
48. M.Van Manen, (1997). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London: Althouse Press.