A probabilistic projection of the transient flow equations with random system parameters and internal boundary conditions

Journal of Hydraulic Research

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 342-359

  Sattar, Ahmed M A ^a  

^a CAIRO UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Blockages; leaks; pipelines; polynomial chaos expansion; probabilistic analysis; random variable; transient flow; water hammer equations

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; FLUID MECHANICS; FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS; FRICTION; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PIPELINES; RANDOM VARIABLES; SHORE PROTECTION; TRANSFER MATRIX METHOD; TRANSITION FLOW;

BLOCKAGES; LEAKS; POLYNOMIAL CHAOS EXPANSION; PROBABILISTIC ANALYSIS; TRANSIENT FLOW; WATER HAMMER EQUATIONS;

POLYNOMIALS;

BOUNDARY CONDITION; CHAOS THEORY; FRICTION; HYDRAULIC HAMMER; HYDROTECHNICAL ENGINEERING; LEAKAGE; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL METHOD; PIPELINE; PROBABILITY; SOFTWARE; TRANSIENT FLOW; WAVE VELOCITY;

EID: 84961205849     PISSN: 00221686     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2016.1140682     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. A.Anderson,, & A.Bergant, (2008). Issues in benchmarking fluid transients software models. Paper presented at the 10th Conf. Pressure Surges, Edinburgh, Scotland, 519–537. BHR Group.
2. A.Beskok,, & G.E.Karniadakis, (1999). Report: A model for flows in channels, pipes, and ducts at micro and nano scales. Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, 3(1), 43–77. doi: 10.1080/108939599199864
3. Z.Brzezniak,, & P.Szymon, (2009). Hyperbolic equations with random boundary conditions. World Scientific Review, 8, 1–21.
4. M.H.Chaudhry, (2014). Applied hydraulic transients. New York: Springer.
5. A.J.Chorin, (1967). A numerical method for solving incompressible viscous flow problems. Journal of Computational Physics, 2(1), 12–26. doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(67)90037-X
6. H.Duan,, Y.Tung,, & M.Ghidaoui, (2010). Probabilistic analysis of transient design for water supply systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 136(6), 678–687. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000074
7. M.El-Beltagy,, & M.Wafa, (2013). Stochastic 2D incompressible Navier-Stokes solver using the vorticity-stream function formulation. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2013, 1–14, journal ID 903618.
8. M.El-Beltagy,, M.Wafa,, & O.Galal, (2012). Upwind Finite-volume solution of stochastic Burgers’ equation. Applied Mathematics, 3(11A), 1818–1825. doi: 10.4236/am.2012.331247
9. C.El Soueidy,, & T.Al Bittar, (2012). Stochastic analysis of flow in porous media with sparse polynomial chaos expansion. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 14, p. 12344, EGU2012.
10. V.Fontaine,, M.Mamode,, & T.A.Mara, (2010). Probabilistic collocation for efficient uncertainty analysis in groundwater flow. Paper presented at the CMWR XVIII, Barcelona, Spain.
11. N.Ghadialo,, S.Rahman,, Y.H.Choi,, & G.Wilkowski, (1975). Deterministic and probabilistic evaluations for uncertainty in pipe fracture parameters in leak-before-break and in-service flaw evaluations. NUREG/CR-6443, US Nuclear Regulatory Commissions, Washington, DC.
12. R.G.Ghanem,, & P.D.Spanos, (2003). Stochastic finite elements: A spectral approach. New York: Springer.
13. T.Hou,, W.Luo,, B.Rozovskii,, & H.Zhou, (2006). Wiener chaos expansion and numerical solutions of randomly forced equations of fluid mechanics. Journal of Computational Physics, 216(2), 687–706. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.01.008
14. O.P.Le Maitre,, & O.M.Knio, (2010). Spectral methods for uncertainty quantification with applications to computational fluid mechanics. New York: Springer.
15. O.P.Le Maitre,, O.M.Knio,, H.Najm,, & R.Ghamed, (2001). A stochastic projection method for fluid flow. Journal of Computational Physics, 173(2), 481–511. doi: 10.1006/jcph.2001.6889
16. M.Loeve, (1977). Probability theory. New York: Springer.
17. A.Owe, (1996). Iterative solution methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. R.Perez, (2008). Uncertainty analysis of computational fluid dynamics via polynomial chaos (PhD dissertation). Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
19. S.Rahman,, G.Chen,, & R.Firmature, (2000). Probabilistic analysis of off-center cracks in cylindrical structures. International Journal of Pressure Vessels Piping, 77(1), 3–16. doi: 10.1016/S0308-0161(99)00076-9
20. S.Sakamoto,, & R.Ghanem, (2002). Polynomial chaos decomposition for the simulation of non-Gaussian nonstationary stochastic processes. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 128(2), 190–201. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:2(190)
21. A.M.Sattar, (2014). Gene expression models for prediction of dam breach parameters. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 16(3), 550–571. doi: 10.2166/hydro.2013.084
22. A.M.Sattar,, & M.Chaudhry, (2008a). Leak detection in pipelines by frequency response method. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 46(S1), 138–151. doi: 10.1080/00221686.2008.9521948
23. A.M.Sattar,, M.Chaudhry,, & A.Kassem, (2008b). Partial blockage detection in pipelines by frequency response method. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 134(1), 76–89. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:1(76)
24. A.M.Sattar,, J.Dickerson,, & M.Chaudhry, (2009). A wavelet Galerkin solution to the transient flow equations. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 135(4), 283–295. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2009)135:4(283)
25. Y.K.Tung,, B.C.Yen,, & C.S.Melching, (2006). Hydrosystems engineering reliability assessments and risk analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
26. S.Wiener, (1938). The homogeneous chaos. American Journal of Mathematics, 60(4), 897–936. doi: 10.2307/2371268
27. D.Xiu,, & G.Karniadakis, (2001). Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos. Journal of Computational Physics, 187(1), 137–167. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00092-5
28. Q.Zhang,, B.Karney,, L.Suo,, & A.Colombo, (2011). Stochastic analysis of water hammer and applications in reliability-based structural design for hydro-turbine penstocks. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 137(11), 1509–1521. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000414