Geoinformatics in groundwater potential mapping and sustainable development: a case study from southern India

Hydrological Sciences Journal

Volumn 61, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1109-1123

  Anbazhagan, S ^a   Jothibasu, A ^a  

^a PERIYAR UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

geomorphology; geophysical methods; GIS; groundwater exploration; remote sensing; sustainable development

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; DEPTH PERCEPTION; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GEOMORPHOLOGY; LANDFORMS; LITHOLOGY; MAPPING; PLANNING; REMOTE SENSING; STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WATER LEVELS;

APPARENT RESISTIVITY; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY DATUM; GEOPHYSICAL METHODS; GROUNDWATER EXPLORATION; GROUNDWATER POTENTIALS; SPATIAL INTEGRATIONS; SUSTAINABLE GROUNDWATER; UTILIZATION OF RESOURCES;

GROUNDWATER RESOURCES;

ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MAPPING; GIS; GROUNDWATER EXPLORATION; LINEAMENT; REMOTE SENSING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WATER LEVEL;

AMARAVATHI BASIN; INDIA; TAMIL NADU;

EID: 84961204013     PISSN: 02626667     EISSN: 21503435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2014.990966     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. A.K.Agarwal,, R.Mohan,, and S.K.S.Yadav,, 2004. An integrated approach of remote sensing, GIS and geophysical techniques of hydrological studies in Rajpura block, Budaun district, Uttar Pradesh. Indian Journal of Power River Valley Development, 1, 35–40.
2. S.Anbazhagan,, 1993. Integrated Groundwater study in drought prone Pennagaram, Dharmapuri district, Tamil Nadu. Bulletin of the Indian Geologist Association, 26 (2), 117–123.
3. S.Anbazhagan,, 1994. Fracture pattern study for groundwater exploration in part of Dharmapuri district Tamil Nadu. Bhu-Jal News, 8 (2), 8–12.
4. S.Anbazhagan,, 2004. Geoinformatics for Hydrological studies. In: Proceedings of Regional Colloquium an Industry-Academia meet on advanced materials, Biosciences, and Computers and Information Technology, Daman, 25–27.
5. S.Anbazhagan,, F.Aschenbrenner,, and K.Knoblich,, 2001. Comparison of aquifer parameters with lineaments derived from remotely sensed data in kinzig basin. In: XXXI. IAH Congress: new approaches to characterizing groundwater flow. Germany, Munich, 2, 883–886.
6. S.Anbazhagan, and G.Balamurugan,, 2011. Remote sensing in delineating Deep Fractured Aquifer zones. In: S.Anbazhagan, S.K.Subramanian, and X.Yang, eds. Geoinformatics in applied geomorphology. New York, NY: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, 205–229.
7. S.Anbazhagan, and S.M.Ramasamy,, 1997. Geophysical resistivity survey and potential site selection for artificial recharge, India. In: P.G.Marinos, et al. ed. International symposium on engineering geology and environment. Athens, 2, 1169–1173.
8. S.Anbazhagan, and E.Saranathan,, 2000. Influence of geology, geomorphology and structure on groundwater condition in hard rock terrains of Tamil Nadu, India. In: Conference on groundwater exploration techniques, 30–31 March Tiruchirappalli, 1–6.
9. S.Anbazhagan,, S.M.Ramasamy,, and J.Moses Edwin,, 2000. Remote sensing and geophysical resistivity survey for groundwater exploration – a comparative analysis. In: Conference on groundwater exploration techniques, Tiruchirappalli. 177–181.
10. Central Ground Water Board, 2009. report, 12–50.
11. R.Chand,, et al., 2004. Estimation of natural recharge and its dependency on subsurface geoelectric parameters. Journal of Hydrology, 299, 67–83. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.04.001
12. R.S.Chatterjee, and A.K.Bhattacharya,, 1995. Delineation of the drainage pattern of a coal basin related inference using satellite remote sensing techniques. Asia Pacific Remote Sensing Journal, 1, 107–114.
13. A.Chowdhury,, M.K.Jha,, and V.M.Chowdary,, 2010. Delineation of groundwater recharge zones and identification of artificial recharge sites in West Medinipur district, West Bengal, using RS, GIS and MCDM techniques. Environmental Earth Sciences, 59, 1209–1222. doi:10.1007/s12665-009-0110-9
14. R.Dhakate,, and V.S.Singh,, 2005. Estimation of hydraulic parameters from surface geophysical methods, Kaliapani ultramafic comple, Orissa, India. Journal of Environmental Hydrology, 13 (12), 1–11.
15. A.E.Edet, and C.S.Okereke,, 1997. Assessment of hydrogeological conditions in basement aquifers of the Precambrian Oban massif, southeastern Nigeria. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 36, 195–204. doi:10.1016/S0926-9851(96)00049-3
16. M.Girish Kumar,, Rameshwar Bali, and A.K.Agarwal,, 2010. Integration of remote sensing and electrical sounding data for hydrogeological exploration-a case study of Bakhar watershed, India. The Hydrological Sciences Journal, 54 (5), 949–960.
17. S.Goyal,, R.S.Bharawadaj,, and D.K.Jugran,, 1999. Multicriteria analysis using GIS for groundwater resource evaluation in Rawasen and Pilli watershed, U.P. Available from: http://www.GISdevelopment.net.
18. M.Gupta, and P.K.Srivastava,, 2010. Integrating GIS and remote sensing for identification of groundwater potential zones in the hilly terrain of Pavagarh, Gujarat, India. Water International, 35 (2), 233–245. doi:10.1080/02508061003664419
19. R.P.Gupta,, 2003. Remote sensing geology. 2nd ed. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
20. P.Gustafsson,, 1993. High-resolution satellite imagery and GIS as a dynamic tool in groundwater exploration in a semi arid area. In: Application of geographic information systems in hydrology and water resources management (Proc.HydroGIS Conf., Vienna, Austria, April 1993) (ed. by K.Kovar and H.P.Nachtnebel), 93–100. IAHS Publ. 211, IAHS Press, Wallingford, UK. Available from: http://iahs.info/redbooks/b211/211011.pdf.
21. W.H.Hobbs,, 1904. Lineaments of the Atlantic border region. Geological Society of American Bulletin, 15, 483–506.
22. M.Israil,, et al., 2006. Groundwater resources evaluation in the Piedmont zone of Himalaya, India, using isotope and GIS technique. Journal Spatial Hydrology, 6 (1), 34–38.
23. R.K.Jaiswal,, et al., 2003. Role of remote sensing and GIS techniques for generation of groundwater prospect zones towards rural development-an approach. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24, 993–1008. doi:10.1080/01431160210144543
24. M.Kavitha,, P.Mohana,, and K.B.Naidu,, 2011. Delineating groundwater potential zones in Thurinjapuram watershed using geospatial techniques. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 4 (11), 1470–1476.
25. S.Krishna Kumar,, et al., 2011. Hydrogeochemical study of shallow carbonate aquifers, Rameswaram Island, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2249-6
26. J.Krishnamurthy,, et al., 1996. Influence of rock types and structures in the development of drainage networks in typical hard rock terrain. ITC Journal, 3 (4), 252–259.
27. A.Kumar,, T.Savita,, and L.B.Prasad,, 2009. Groundwater prospects analysis through hydrogeophysical parameters and hydrogeomorphic zonation - a case study in parts of Kewta Watershed, upper Barakar basin, Bihar. Available from: GISdevelopment.net.
28. J.R.Kumar,, T.A.Balasubramanian,, and A.Kumar,, 2011. Delineation and evaluation of groundwater potential zones using electrical resistivity survey and aquifer performance test in Uppodai of Chittar – Uppodai water shed, Tambaraparani River Basin, Tirunelveli-Thoothukudi Districts, Tamilnadu. Journal of Indian Geophysical Union, 15 (2), 85–94.
29. N.S.Magesh,, N.Chandrasekar,, and J.P.Soundranayagam,, 2011. Morphometric evaluation of Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds, parts of Western Ghats, Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu, India: a GIS approach. Environmental Earth Sciences, 64, 373–381. doi:10.1007/s12665-010-0860-4
30. N.C.Mondal,, S.N.Das,, and V.S.Singh,, 2008. Integrated approach for identification of potential groundwater zones in Seethanagaram Mandal of Vizianagaram District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Journal ofEarth SystemScience, 117 (2), 133–144. doi:10.1007/s12040-008-0004-3
31. M.Muralidhar,, et al., 2000. Remote sensing applications for the evaluation of water resources in rainfed area, Warangal district, Andhra Pradesh. The Indian Mineralogists, 34, 33–40.
32. K.S.R.Murthy,, 2000. Ground water potential in a semi-arid region of Andhra Pradesh - a geographical information system approach. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21 (9), 1867–1884. doi:10.1080/014311600209788
33. K.Nageswara Rao, and K.Narendra,, 2006. Mapping and evaluation of urban sprawling in the Mehadrigedda watershed in Visakhapatnam metropolitan region using remote sensing and GIS. Current Science, 91, 1552–1557.
34. S.Narayanaswamy,, 1975. Proposal for charnockite-khondalite system in the Archean shield of Peninsular India. Geological Survey of India, Mise. Publ., 23 (1), 1–16.
35. A.B.Narayanpethkar,, A.Vasanthi,, and K.Mallick,, 2006. Electrical resistivity technique for exploration and studies on flow pattern of groundwater in multi-aquifer system in the basaltic terrain of the Adila basin, Maharashtra. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 67 (1), 69–82.
36. D.W.O’leary,, J.D.Friedman,, and H.A.Pohn,, 1976. Lineament, linear and lineation: some proposed new standards for old terms. Geological SocietyofAmericaBulletin, 87, 1463–1469. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1976)87<1463:LLLSPN>2.0.CO;2
37. G.OBI Reddy,, et al., 2000. Evaluation of groundwater potential zones using remote sensing data—a case study of Gaimukh watershed, Bhandaradistrict, Maharashtra. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 28 (1), 19–32. doi:10.1007/BF02991858
38. J.O.Oseji,, E.A.Atakpo,, and E.C.Okolie,, 2005. Geoelectric investigation of the aquifer characteristics and groundwater potential in Kwale, Delta state, Nigeria. Journal of Applied Science Environmental Management, 9 (1), 157–160.
39. K.Pratap,, K.V.Ravindran,, and B.Prabakaran,, 2000. Groundwater prospect zoning using remote sensing and geographical information system: a case study in Dala-Renukoot area, Sonbhadra district, Uttar Pradesh. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 28, 249–263. doi:10.1007/BF02990815
40. R.T.Ranganai, and C.J.Ebinger,, 2008. Aeromagnetic and landsat TM structural interpretation for identifying regional groundwater exploration targets, south-central Zimbabwe Craton. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 65, 73–83. doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.05.009
41. M.Rashid,, M.Lone,, and S.Ahmed,, 2012. Integrating geospatial and ground geophysical information as guidelines for groundwater potential zones in hard rock terrains of south India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184, 4829–4839. doi:10.1007/s10661-011-2305-2
42. S.M.Sabale,, V.R.Ghodake,, and A.B.Narayanpethkar,, 2009. Electrical resistivity distribution studies for artificial recharge of groundwater in the Dhubdhubi Basin, Solapur District, Maharashtra, India. Journal of Indian Geophysical Union, 13 (4), 201–207.
43. P.C.Sahu, and H.Sahoo,, 2006. Targeting ground water in tribal dominated Bonai area of drought-prone Sundargarh District, Orissa, India—a combined geophysical and remote sensing approach. Journal of Human Ecology, 20 (2), 109–115.
44. A.K.Saraf, and P.R.Choudhury,, 1998. Integrated remote sensing and GIS for ground water exploration and identification of artificial recharge sites. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19 (10), 1825–1841. doi:10.1080/014311698215018
45. S.Shahid, and S.K.Nath,, 1999. GIS integration of remote sensing and electrical sounding data for hydrogeological exploration. Journal of Spatial Hydrology, 2 (1), 1–12.
46. S.Shahid,, and S.K.Nath,, 2002. GIS integration of remote sensing and electrical sounding data for hydrogeological exploration. Journal of Spatial Hydrology, 2 (1), 1–12.
47. B.B.S.Singhal, and R.P.Gupta,, 1999. Applied hydrogeology of fractured rocks. India: Department of Earth Sciences University of Rookee.
48. B.K.Sinha,, et al., 1990. Integrated approach for demarcating the fracture zone for well site location: a case study near Gumla and Lohardaga, Bihar. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 18 (3), 1–8. doi:10.1007/BF03030727
49. S.Sree Devi,, S.Srinivasulu,, and K.K.Raju,, 2001. Delineation of groundwater potential zones and electrical resistivity studies for groundwater exploration. Environmental Geology, 40 (10), 1252–1264. doi:10.1007/s002540100304
50. P.K.Srivastava, and A.K.Bhattacharya,, 2006. Groundwater assessment through an integrated approach using remote sensing, GIS and resistivity techniques: a case study from a hard rock terrain. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27 (20), 4599–4620. doi:10.1080/01431160600554983
51. P.K.Srivastava,, et al., 2012. Integrated framework for monitoring groundwater pollution using a geographical information system and multivariate analysis. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 57 (7), 1453–1472. doi:10.1080/02626667.2012.716156
52. N.Subba Rao, and R.Prathap Reddy,, 1999. Groundwater prospects in a developing satellite township of Andhra Pradesh, India using remote sensing techniques. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 27 (4), 193–203. doi:10.1007/BF02990832
53. R.M.Teeuw,, 1995. Groundwater exploration using remote sensing and a low-cost geographical information system. Hydrogeology Journal, 3 (3), 21–30. doi:10.1007/s100400050057
54. R.J.Twiss, and E.M.Moores,, 1992. Structural geology. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.
55. B.P.A.Vander Velpen,, 1988. Resist Version 1.0. Delf Netherland: MSc Research Project, ITC.
56. T.V.Viswanathan,, 1969. The granulite rocks of the Indian Precambrian Shield. Geological Survey of India, 100, 37–66.
57. P.Waters,, et al., 1990. Applications of remote sensing to groundwater hydrology. Remote Sensing Reviews, 4 (2), 223–264. doi:10.1080/02757259009532107