Testing Criterion Correlations With Scale Component Measurement Errors Using Latent Variable Modeling

Structural Equation Modeling

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 468-474

  Raykov, Tenko ^a   Marcoulides, George A ^b   Gabler, Siegfried ^c   Lee, Youngjun ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c GESIS LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR THE SOCIAL SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Benjamini Hochberg procedure; correlation; criterion; criterion validity; latent variable modeling; measurement error; multiple testing

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; ERRORS; INSTRUMENT TESTING;

COMPONENT MEASUREMENT; CRITERION; CRITERION VALIDITY; LATENT VARIABLE MODELING; MEASURING INSTRUMENTS; MULTIPLE TESTING; TESTING CRITERIA; VALIDITY ESTIMATION;

MEASUREMENT ERRORS;

EID: 84961203889     PISSN: 10705511     EISSN: 15328007     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2015.1136220     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y., (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate:A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 57, 289–300.
2. Benjamini, Y., & Yekutieli, D., (2001). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Annals of Statistics, 29, 1165–1188.
3. Bollen, K. A., (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY:Wiley.
4. Crocker, L., & Algina, J., (2006). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Fort Worth, TX:Harcourt College.
5. Hays, W. L., (1994). Statistics. Fort Worth, TX:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
6. Jöreskog, K. G., (1971). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36, 109–133. doi:10.1007/BF02291393
7. McDonald, R. P., (1999). Test theory:A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
8. Messick, S., (1995). Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
9. Muthén, B. O., (2002). Beyond SEM:General latent variable modeling. Behaviormetrika, 29, 81–117. doi:10.2333/bhmk.29.81
10. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B., (2015). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA:Muthén & Muthén.
11. Raykov, T., (2001). Testing multivariable covariance structure and means hypotheses via structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 224–257. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0802_4
12. Raykov, T., (2012). Scale development using structural equation modeling. In R., Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 472–492). New York, NY:Guilford.
13. Raykov, T., Gabler, S., & Dimitrov, D. M., (2015). Maximal reliability and composite reliability:A latent variable modeling approach to their difference evaluation. Structural Equation Modeling. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.966369
14. Raykov, T., Gabler, S., & Dimitrov, D. M., (in press). Maximal criterion validity and scale criterion validity:A latent variable modeling approach to examining their difference. Manuscript submitted for publication.
15. Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A., (2011). Introduction to psychometric theory. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
16. Raykov, T., Marcoulides, G. A., & Li, T., (in press). Evaluation of criterion validity of measurement instruments in finite mixture settings. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
17. Raykov, T., & Shrout, P., (2002). Reliability of scales with general structure:Point and interval estimation using a structural equation modeling approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 195–212. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_3
18. Venables, W. N., & Smith, D. M., & the R Development Core Team. (2013). An introduction to R:A programming environment for data analysis and graphics. Version 3.0.2. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-intro.pdf
19. Wasserman, L. H., (2004). All of statistics. New York, NY:Springer.
20. Zimmerman, D. W., (1975). Probability measures, Hilbert spaces, and the axioms of classical test theory. Psychometrika, 40, 395–412. doi:10.1007/BF02291765