Comparative performance of three experimental hut designs for measuring malaria vector responses to insecticides in Tanzania

Malaria Journal

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Massue, Dennis J ^a,b,c   Kisinza, William N ^c   Malongo, Bernard B ^c   Mgaya, Charles S ^c   Bradley, John ^d   Moore, Jason D ^d,e   Tenu, Filemoni F ^c   Moore, Sarah J ^a,b,e  

^a SWISS TROPICAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Tanzania)

^d LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^e IFAKARA HEALTH INSTITUTE   (Tanzania)

Author keywords

Experimental hut design; Insecticide; Long lasting insecticidal net; Malaria; Malaria vector; Tanzania; WHOPES

Indexed keywords

INSECTICIDE;

ANOPHELES GAMBIAE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CARRIER; INSECTICIDAL ACTIVITY; MALARIA; NONHUMAN; SCHISTOSOMA MANSONI; TANZANIA; VECTOR CONTROL; ANIMAL; ANOPHELES; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULEX; DRUG EFFECTS; EVALUATION STUDY; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSECT VECTOR; INSECTICIDE TREATED NET; MALVACEAE; MOSQUITO CONTROL; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; ZOOLOGY;

ANIMALS; ANOPHELES; CULEX; ENTOMOLOGY; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS; HUMANS; INSECT VECTORS; INSECTICIDE-TREATED BEDNETS; INSECTICIDES; MOSQUITO CONTROL; STERCULIACEAE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TANZANIA;

EID: 84961186737     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14752875     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12936-016-1221-x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Wright JW. The WHO programme for the evaluation and testing of new insecticides. Bull World Health Organ. 1971;44:11-22.
2. WHOPES. Guidelines for laboratory and field testing of long-lasting insceticidal nets WHO/HTM/NTD/WHOPES/2013.3. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
3. Achee NL, Grieco JP, Andre RG, Rejmankova E, Roberts DR. A mark-release-recapture study using a novel portable hut design to define the flight behavior of Anopheles darlingi in Belize, Central America. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2005;21:366-79.
4. Chareonviriyaphap T, Grieco JP, Suwonkerd W, Prabaripai A, Polsomboon S, Thainchum K, et al. An improved experimental hut design for the study of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) movement patterns in Thailand. J Vector Ecol. 2010;35:428-31.
5. Okumu FO, Moore J, Mbeyela E, Sherlock M, Sangusangu R, Ligamba G, et al. A modified experimental hut design for studying responses of disease-transmitting mosquitoes to indoor interventions: the ifakara experimental huts. PLoS One. 2012;7:e30967.
6. Silver JB, Service MW. Chapter 16 Experimental Hut Techniques. Mosquito ecology: field sampling methods. Berlin: Springer; 2008. p. 1494.
7. Smith A. A verandah-trap hut for studying the house-frequenting habits of mosquitoes and for assessing insecticides. I. A description of the verandah-trap hut and of studies on the egress of Anopheles gambiae Giles and Mansonia uniformis (Theo.) from an untreated hut. Bull Entomol Res. 1965;56:161-9.
8. Darriet F, N'Guessan R, Hougard JM, Traoré-Lamizana M, Carnevale P. An experimental tool essential for the evaluation of insecticides: the testing huts (in French). Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2002;95:299-303.
9. Gillies TM, de Meillon DB. The Anopheles of Africa South of Sahara (Ethiopian Zoogeographic Region). 2nd ed. Johannesburg: Republic of South Africa. Publication of the South African Institute for Medical Research 1968, No.54.
10. Gillies MT, Coetzee M. A Supplement to the Anophelinae of Africa South of the Sahara (Afrotropical region). Publ South Afr Inst Med Res. 1987;55:143.
11. Scott JA, Brogdon WG, Collins FH. Identification of single specimens of the Anopheles gambiae complex by the polymerase chain reaction. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1993;49:520-9.
12. Abbott WS. A method for computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol. 1925;18:265-7.
13. R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: The R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available online at http://www.R-project.org/. 2011. Accessed 2 Oct 2015 (ISBN: 3-900051-07-0).
14. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0999375-39. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html. 2011.
15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135-60.
16. Lines JD, Curtis CF, Wilkes TJ, Njunwa KJ. Monitoring human-biting mosquitoes (Diptera:Culicidae) in Tanzania with light-traps hung beside mosquito nets. Bull Ent Res. 1991;81:77-84.
17. Johnson PCD, Barry SJE, Ferguson HF, Muller P. Power analysis for generalized linear mixed models in ecology and evolution. Methods Ecol Evol. 2014;2015(6):133-42.
18. Smith A, Hudson JE. A modification to an experimental hut to reduce mosquito eaves-egress. WHO/Mal/72.775, Geneva: World Health Organization; 1972:6.
19. Tungu P, Magesa S, Maxwell C, Malima R, Masue D, Sudi W, et al. Evaluation of PermaNet 3.0 a deltamethrin-PBO combination net against Anopheles gambiae and pyrethroid resistant Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes: an experimental hut trial in Tanzania. Malar J. 2010;9:21.
20. Briet OJ, Smith TA, Chitnis N. Measurement of overall insecticidal effects in experimental hut trials. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:256.
21. Koudou BG, Koffi AA, Malone D, Hemingway J. Efficacy of PermaNet(R) 2.0 and PermaNet(R) 3.0 against insecticide-resistant Anopheles gambiae in experimental huts in Côte d'Ivoire. Malar J. 2011;10:172.
22. Okumu FO, Mbeyela E, Lingamba G, Moore J, Ntamatungiro AJ, Kavishe DR, et al. Comparative field evaluation of combinations of long-lasting insecticide treated nets and indoor residual spraying, relative to either method alone, for malaria prevention in an area where the main vector is Anopheles arabiensis. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:46.