CO2 reforming of CH4 over Ni-Co/MSN for syngas production: Role of Co as a binder and optimization using RSM

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 295, Issue , 2016, Pages 1-10

  Sidik, S M ^a   Triwahyono, S ^a   Jalil, A A ^a   Majid, Z A ^a   Salamun, N ^a   Talib, N B ^a   Abdullah, T A T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Bimetallic; CO2 reforming of CH4; Cobalt; Nickel; Optimization

Indexed keywords

BINDERS; BINS; CARBON DIOXIDE; CATALYSTS; COBALT; COBALT ALLOYS; DISPERSIONS; NICKEL; OPTIMIZATION; PARTICLE SIZE; PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS; SINTERING; SURFACE ANALYSIS;

BIMETALLIC; METAL DISPERSIONS; NI-CO CATALYSTS; QUADRATIC INTERACTION; REACTION TEMPERATURE; RESPONSE SURFACE ANALYSIS; SYNERGISTIC EFFECT; SYNGAS PRODUCTION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA);

EID: 84961173404     PISSN: 13858947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.03.041     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Zhang J., Wang H., Dalai A.K. Development of stable bimetallic catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming of methane. J. Catal. 2007, 249:300-310.
2. 2 reforming of methane over Ni based catalysts. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 278:62-78.
3. Ibrahim A.A., Fakeeha A.H., Al-Fatesh A.S. Enhancing hydrogen production by dry reforming process with strontium promoter. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39:1680-1687.
4. Liu D., Quek X.Y., Cheo W.N.E., Lau R., Borgna A., Yang Y. MCM-41 supported nickel-based catalysts with superior stability during carbon dioxide reforming of methane: effect of strong metal-support interaction. J. Catal. 2009, 266:380-390.
5. 2 reforming. Energy Convers. Manage. 2015, 97:273-281.
6. 2: preparation, characterization and activity studies. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2010, 100:365-377.
7. Karim A.H., Jalil A.A., Triwahyono S., Sidik S.M., Kamarudin N.H.N., Jusoh R., Jusoh N.W.C., Hameed B.H. Amino modified mesostructured silica nanoparticles for efficient adsorption of methylene blue. J. Colloid Inter. Sci. 2012, 386:307-314.
8. Kamarudin N.H.N., Jalil A.A., Triwahyono S., Salleh N.F.M., Karim A.H., Mukti R.R., Hameed B.H., Ahmad R. Role of 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane in the preparation of mesoporous silica nanoparticles for ibuprofen delivery: effect on physicochemical properties. Microporous and Mesoporous Mater. 2013, 180:235-241.
9. 2 methanation. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2014, 147:359-368.
10. 4 over Ni/mesostructured silica nanoparticles (Ni/MSN). RSC Adv. 2015, 5:37405-37414.
11. 2 Util. 2016, 13:71-80.
12. Jalil A.A., Kurono N., Tokuda M. Facile synthesis of Ethyl 2-Arylpropenoates by Cross-coupling reaction using electrogenerated highly reactive zinc. Tetrahedron 2002, 58:7477-7484.
13. Bezerra M.A., Santelli R.E., Oliveira E.P., Villar L.S., Escaleira L.A. Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta 2008, 76:965-977.
14. 2 production by sorption enhanced steam reforming of biomass-derived bio-oil in a fluidized bed reactor: an assessment of the effect of operation variables using response surface methodology. Catal. Today 2015, 242:19-34.
15. 2 catalyst: process optimization. Inter. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36:4875-4886.
16. Usman M., Daud W.W., Abbas H.F. Dry reforming of methane: influence of process parameters-a review. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2015, 45:710-744.
17. 2 methanation over Ni-promoted mesostructured silica nanoparticles: influence of Ni loading and water vapor on activity and response surface methodology studies. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 260:757-764.
18. 2 supported Ni, Co and Ni-Co catalysts. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2015, 179:128-138.
19. 2 Util. 2015, 10:67-77.
20. Jusoh N.W.C., Jalil A.A., Triwahyono S., Mamat C.R. Tailoring the metal introduction sequence onto mesostructured silica nanoparticles framework: effect on physicochemical properties and photoactivity. Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2015, 492:169-176.
21. Deshmane V.G., Owen S.L., Abrokwah R.Y., Kuila D. Mesoporous nanocrystalline TiO2 supported metal (Cu Co, Ni, Pd, Zn and Sn) catalysts: effect of metal-support interactions on steam reforming of methanol. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2015, 408:202-213.
22. 4 reforming. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 207:299-307.
23. 3 via modulating impregnation sequence and controlling surface active species. RSC Adv. 2014, 4:16472-16479.
24. Takanabe K., Nagaoka K., Nariai K., Aika K. Titania-supported cobalt and nickel bimetallic catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming of methane. J. Catal. 2005, 232:268-275.
25. Yu Y., Jin Q., Wang Y., Guo X. Synthesis of natural gas from CO methanation over SiC supported Ni-Co bimetallic catalysts. Catal. Commun. 2013, 31:5-10.
26. 7 pyrochlores. J. Catal. 2014, 316:78-92.
27. Garcia-Dieguez M., Finocchio E., Larrubia M.A., Alemany L.J., Busca G. Characterization of alumina-supported Pt, Ni, and PtNi alloy catalysts for the dry reforming of methane. J. Catal. 2010, 274:11-20.
28. Fakeeha A.H., Khan W.U., Al-Fatesh A.S., Abasaeed A.E., Naeem M.A. Production of hydrogen and carbon nanofibers from methane over Ni-Co-Al catalysts. Inter. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40:1774-1781.
29. Xu J., Zhou W., Li Z., Wang J., Ma J. Biogas reforming for hydrogen production over nickel and cobalt bimetallic catalysts. Inter. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:6646-6654.
30. Zhao M., Church T.L., Harris A.T. SBA-15 supported Ni-Co bimetallic catalysts for enhanced hydrogen production during cellulose decomposition. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2011, 101:522-530.
31. Estephane J., Aouad S., Hany S., Khoury B.E., Gennequin C., Zakhem H.E., Nakat J.E., Aboukayis A., Aad E.A. CO2 reforming of methane over Ni-Co/ZSM5 catalysts. Aging and carbon deposition study. Inter. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40:9201-9208.
32. 3 catalyst. Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2006, 24:204-210.
33. 2 reforming. Fuel Process. Technol. 2015, 140:39-45.
34. Zakaria Z.Y., Amin N.A.S., Linnekoski J. Optimization of catalytic glycerol steam reforming to light olefins using Cu/ZSM-5 catalyst. Energy Convers. Manage. 2014, 86:735-744.
35. Setiabudi H.D., Jalil A.A., Triwahyono S., Kamarudin N.H.N., Jusoh R. Ir/Pt-HZSM-5 for n-pentane isomerization. Effect of Si/Al ratio and reaction optimization by response surface methodology. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 217:300-309.
36. Haaland P.D. Experimental Design in Biotechnology 1989, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.
37. 3 nanocatalyst: impregnated vs plasma-treated catalyst. Energy Convers. Manage. 2014, 84:50-59.
38. Mirzaei F., Rezaei M., Meshkani F., Fattah Z. Carbon dioxide reforming of methane for syngas production over Co-MgO mixed oxide nanocatalysts. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 21:662-667.
39. Khavarian M., Chai S.-P., Mahamed A.R. The effects of process parameter on carbon dioxide reforming of methane over Co-Mo-MgO/MWCNTs nanocomposite catalysts. Fuel 2015, 158:129-138.
40. 2 reforming of methane. Energy Convers. Manage. 2013, 76:1093-1103.