Increasing replicability

Social Psychology

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 1-3

  Unkelbach, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84961134837     PISSN: 18649335     EISSN: 21512590     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000270     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2, e124.
2. Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 54-69.
3. Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 196-217.
4. Maxwell, S. E., and Lau., M. Y., & Howard, G. S. (2015). Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does "failure to replicate" really mean? American Psychologist, 70, 487-498.
5. Monin, B., & Oppenheimer, D. (2014). Commentaries and rejoinder on Klein et al. (2014): The limits of direct replications and the virtues of stimulus sampling. Social Psychology, 45, 299-301. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000202
6. Nauts, S., Langner, O., Huijsmans, I., Vonk, R., & Wigboldus, D. J. (2014). Forming impressions of personality: A replication and review of Asch's (1946) evidence for a primacy-of-warmth effect in impression formation. Social Psychology, 45, 153-163. doi:10.1027/1864-335/a000179
7. Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports: A method to increase the credibility of published results. Social Psychology, 45, 137-141. doi:10.1027/1864-335/a000192
8. Nuzzo, R. (2014). Statistical Errors. Nature, 506, 151-153.
9. Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, 943.
10. Replication-Index. (2015). Replicability Ranking of 54 Psychology Journals. Retrieved from https://replicationindex.wordpress.com/2015/10/27/2015-replicability-ranking-of-54-psychology-journals/
11. Schönbrodt, F. D., & Perugini, M. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 609-612.
12. Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does merely going through the same moves make for a "Direct" Replication? Concepts, contexts, and operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45, 305-306. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000202
13. Stroebe, W., & Strack, F. (2014). The alleged crisis and the illusion of exact replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 59-71.
14. Unkelbach, C. (2013). Social Psychology - change and consistency. Social Psychology, 44, 1-3. doi:10.1027/1864-335/a000135
15. Unkelbach, C. (2014). The best of times, the worst of times. Social Psychology, 45, 71-73. doi:10.1027/1864-335/a000194
16. Unkelbach, C. (2015). Looking back and looking forward. Social Psychology, 46, 1-3. doi:10.1027/1864-335/a000237
17. Wesselmann, E. D., and Williams., K. D., Pryor, J. B., Eichler, F. A., and Gill., D. M., & Hogue, J. D. (2014). Revisiting Schachter's research on rejection, deviance, and communication (1951). Social Psychology, 45, 164-169. doi:10.1027/1864-335/a000180
18. Westfall, J., and Kenny., D. A., & Judd, C. M. (2014). Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 2020-2045.
19. Westfall, J., and Judd., C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (2015). Replicating studies in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 390-399.