QSAR Toolbox – workflow and major functionalities

SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 203-219

  Dimitrov, S D ^a   Diderich, R ^b   Sobanski, T ^c   Pavlov, T S ^a   Chankov, G V ^a   Chapkanov, A S ^a   Karakolev, Y H ^a   Temelkov, S G ^a   Vasilev, R A ^a   Gerova, K D ^a   Kuseva, C D ^a   Todorova, N D ^a   Mehmed, A M ^a   Rasenberg, M ^c   Mekenyan, O G ^a  

^a ASSEN ZLATAROV UNIVERSITY   (Bulgaria)

^b OECD   (France)

^c EUROPEAN CHEMICALS AGENCY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Category approach; data gap filling; QSAR; read across; Toolbox; trend analysis

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMS; CHEMICAL HAZARDS; COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY; INDICATORS (CHEMICAL);

CATEGORY APPROACH; DATA GAP; DATA GAP FILLING; GAP FILLING; QSAR; READ-ACROSS; SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS; TOOLBOX; TREND ANALYSIS; WORK-FLOWS;

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY;

EID: 84961128877     PISSN: 1062936X     EISSN: 1029046X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1062936X.2015.1136680     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. A.F.A.Cros, Action de l'alcool amylique sur l'organisme, University of Strasbourg, Ph.D. diss., 1863.
2. A.Crum-Brown and T.R.Fraser, On the connection between chemical constitution and physiological action; with special reference to the physiological action of the salts of the ammonium bases derived from Strychnia, Brucia, Thebaia, Codeia, Morphia, and Nicotia, J. Anat. Physiol. 2 (1868), pp. 224–242.
3. C.Richet, Note sur le rapport entre la toxicité et les propriétés physiques des corps, QSAR and Molecular structure C.R.Hebdom. Séan. Mem. Soc. Biol. (Paris), 9e série, t. V. (1893), pp. 775–776.
4. H.Meyer, Zur Theorie der Alkoholnarkose. Erste Mittheilung. Welche Eigenschaft der Anästhetica bedingt ihre narkotische Wirkung?, Arch. Exp. Pathol. Pharmacol. 42 (1899), pp. 109–118.
5. C.E.Overton, Studien über die Narkose, zugleich ein Beitrag zur allgemeinen Pharmakologie, Gustav Fischer, Jena, 1901.
6. L.P.Hammett, Some relations between reaction rates and equilibrium constants, Chem. Rev. 17 (1935), pp. 125–136.
7. L.P.Hammett, The effect of structure upon the reactions of organic compounds. Benzene derivatives, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 59 (1937), pp. 96–103.
8. C.Hansch, P.P.Maloney, T.Fujita, and R.M.Muir, Correlation of biological activity of phenoxyacetic acids with Hammett substituent constants and partition coefficients, Nature 194 (1962), pp. 178–180.
9. C.Hansch, R.M.Muir, T.Fujita, P.P.Maloney, C.F.Geiger, and M.Streich, The correlation of biological activity of plant growth-regulators and chloromycetin derivatives with Hammett constants and partition coefficients, J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 85 (1963), pp. 2817–2824.
10. S.M.Free and J.W.Wilson, A mathematical contribution to structure-activity studies, J. Med. Chem. 7 (1964), pp. 395–399.
11. J.G.Topliss and R.J.Costello, Chance correlations in structure-activity studies using multiple regression analysis, J. Med. Chem. 15 (1972), pp. 1066–1068.
12. S.H.Unger and C.Hansch, On model building in structure-activity relationships. A reexamination of adrenergic blocking of β-halo-β-arylalkylamines, J. Med. Chem. 16 (1973), pp. 745–749.
13. J.S.Jaworska, M.Comber, C.Auer, and C.J.Van Leeuwen, Summary of a workshop on regulatory acceptance of (Q)SARs for human health and environmental endpoints, Environ. Health Perspect. 111 (2003), pp. 1358–1360.
14. OECD, The Report from the Expert Group on (Quantitative) Structure–Activity Relationships [(Q)SARs] on the Principles for the Validation of (Q)SARs, ENV/JM/TG(2004)27/REV, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 2004.
15. R.Diderich, Tools for category formation and read-across overview of the OECD (Q)SAR application toolbox, in In Silico Toxicology: Principles and Applications, M.T.D.Cronin and J.C.Madden, eds., RSC Publishing, Cambridge, 2010, pp. 385–407.
16. T.W.Schultz, Gilman D. Veith (1944–2013) – A dedication, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 25 (2014), pp. 249–251.
17. Chemical Abstracts Service, Regulated chemicals. Available at https://www.cas.org/content/regulated-chemicals.
18. M.Fleischer, Testing costs and testing capacity according to the REACH requirements – results of a survey of independent and corporate GLP laboratories in the EU and Switzerland, J. Business Chem. 4 (2007), pp. 96–114.
19. European Parliament and the Council, Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European parliament and the Council of November 30, 2009 on cosmetic products (recast) text of importance for the EEA, Official Journal of the European Union, L 342/59-342/209, 2009. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32009R1223&from=EN.
20. OECD, Guidance document on pesticide residue analytical methods, ENV/JM/MONO 2007, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 2007.
21. OECD, Guidance on grouping of chemicals, second edition, ENV/JM/MONO(2014)4, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 2014.
22. S.Dimitrov and O.Mekenyan, An introduction to read-across for the prediction of the effects of chemicals, in In Silico Toxicology: Principles and Applications, M.T.D.Cronin and J.C.Madden, eds., RSC Publishing, Cambridge, 2010, pp. 372–384.
23. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, TSCA new chemicals program (NCP) chemical categories. Available at http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-10/documents/ncp_chemical_categories_august_2010_version_0.pdf.
24. OECD, Draft revision of the guidance document for the formation and use of chemical categories, ENV/JM/EXCH/SIAM(2004)6, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 2004.
25. OECD, Guidance on grouping of chemicals, ENV/JM/MONO(2014)4. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 2014.
26. OECD, (Q)SARs: Guidance documents and reports. Available at http://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/riskassessment/guidancedocumentsandreportsrelatedtoqsars.htm.
27. J.W.McFarland, On the parabolic relationship between drug potency and hydrophobicity, J. Med. Chem. 13 (1970), pp. 1192–1196.
28. OECD, Guidance on grouping of chemicals, ENV/JM/MONO(2007)28, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 2007.
29. International Uniform Chemical Information Database. Available at https://iuclid6.echa.europa.eu/.
30. Joint Research Centre. Available at https://eurl-ecvam.jrc.ec.europa.eu/laboratories-research/predictive_toxicology/qsar_tools/qrf/.
31. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Available at http://www.oecd.org/ehs/templates/.
32. OECD, Guidance document on developing and assessing adverse outcome pathways, ENV/JM/MONO(2013)6, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 2013.