Pixilated partnerships, overcoming obstacles in qualitative interviews via Skype: a research note

Qualitative Research

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 229-235

  Seitz, Sally ^a  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

internet interviews; qualitative; research partnership; Skype; strategies

Indexed keywords

EID: 84960963408     PISSN: 14687941     EISSN: 17413109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1468794115577011     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. H.DeakinK.Wakefield (2014) Skype interviewing: reflections of two PhD researchers. Qualitative Research14(5): 603–616. DOI:10.1177/1468794113488126.
2. K.Esterberg (2002) Qualitative Methods in Social Research. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
3. P.Hanna (2012) Using internet technologies (such as Skype) as a research medium: a research note. Qualitative Research12(2): 239–242. DOI:10.1177/1468794111426607.
4. A.Holt (2010) Using telephones for narrative interviewing: a research note. Qualitative Research10(1): 113–121. DOI:10.1177/1468794109348686.
5. R.JanghorbanR.Latifnejad RoudsariA.Taghipour (2014) Skype interviewing: the new generation of online synchronous interview in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being9. DOI:10.3402/qhw.v9.24152.
6. H.O’ConnorC.MadgeR.ShawJ.Wellens (2008) Internet-based interviewing. In: (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods. London: Sage, 271–289.
7. L.OrchardC.Fullwood (2010) Current perspectives on personality and internet use. Social Science Computer Review28(2): 155–169.
8. G.ScottR.Garner (2013) Doing Qualitative Research: Designs, Methods, and Techniques. Boston, MA: Pearson.
9. R.Weiss (1994) Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York: The Free Press.
10. S.Winzenburg (2012) How Skype is changing the interview process. Chronicle of Higher Education58(18): D9–D10.
11. K.Yilmaz (2013) Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education48(2): 311–325.