Estimating the biotech sector's contribution to the US economy

Nature Biotechnology

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 247-255

  Carlson, Robert ^a  

^a Biodesic   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL PRODUCT;

ARTICLE; BIOTECHNOLOGICAL PRODUCTION; BIOTECHNOLOGY; DATA ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; DRUG INDUSTRY; DRUG MANUFACTURE; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; GOVERNMENT; GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES; ECONOMICS; HUMAN;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; DRUG INDUSTRY; HUMANS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84960941501     PISSN: 10870156     EISSN: 15461696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3491     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Emerging Policy Issues in Synthetic Biology. (OECD, 2014).
2. Aggarwal, R.S. What's fueling the biotech engine-2012 to 2013. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 32-39 (2014).
3. Morrison, C. & Lähteenmäki, R. Public biotech in 2014-the numbers. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 703-709 (2015).
4. Carlson, R.H. Biology is Technology: The Promise, Peril, and New Business of Engineering Life. (Harvard University Press, 2010).
5. Sagal, M. Synthetic Biology for the Next Generation, A Symposium Under the Auspices of The National Academy of Sciences (12-13 June 2012).
6. La Merie Business Intelligence. Blockbuster Biologics 2012 https://www.pipelinereview.com/index. php/2013050850905/FREE-Reports/Blockbuster-Biologics-2012.html (9 May 2013).
7. International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations. The Pharmaceutical Industry and Global Health: Facts and Figures 2012 http://www.ifpma.org/fileadmin/content/Publication/2013/IFPMA-Facts-And-Figures-2012-LowResSinglePage.pdf (IFPMA, 2012).
8. Carlson, R. Causes and Consequences of Bioeconomic Proliferation: Implications for U.S. Physical and Economic Security (Homeland Security Institute, 2011).
9. James, C. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2012. ISAA brief 44 (ISAAA, 2012).
10. Carlson, R. The market value of GM products. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 984-984 (2009).
11. Committee on the Impact of Biotechnology on Farm-Level Economics and Sustainability, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council. Impact of Genetically Engineered Crops on Farm Sustainability in the United States (The National Academies Press, 2010).
12. Brookes, G. & Barfoot, P. The global income and production effects of genetically modified (GM) crops 1996-2011. GM Crops Food 4, 74-83 (2013).
13. Klümper, W. & Qaim, M. A meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops. PLoS One 9, e111629 (2014).
14. Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Wechsler, S., Livingston, M. & Mitchell, L. Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/err-economic-research-report/err162.aspx (USDA ERS, 2014).
15. Solomon, D. U.S. Congressional Briefing: Tooling the Bioeconomy (US Congress, Washington, DC, November 5, 2013). https://vimeo.com/album/2662670
16. National Mining Association. The Economic Contributions of U.S. Mining (2012) http://www.nma.org/pdf/economic-contributions.pdf (National Mining Association, 2014).
17. Battelle/BIO. Battelle/BIO State Bioscience Jobs, Investments and Innovation 2014 (Biotechnology Industry Organization, 2014).
18. Anonymous. How big is the bioeconomy? Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 598 (2014).
19. Biotechnology Industry Organization. Unleashing the Promise of Biotechnology https://www3.bio.org/aboutbio/promiseofbiotech.pdf (BIO, 2011).
20. Office of the Chief Economist and Office of Energy Policy and New Uses. Biobased Economy Indicators (USDA, 2011).
21. Batchelor, S. New Opportunities: Renewable Chemicals and Biobased Products http://energyoutlook2012. naseo.org/presentations/Batchelor-Renewable-Chemicals-and-Biobased-Products.pdf (NASEO Winter Policy Outlook Conference, 8 February 2012).
22. European Commission. Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe http://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/pdf/201202-innovating-sustainable-growth-en.pdf (European Commission, 2012).
23. Carlson, R. From national security to natural security. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists http://thebulletin.org/national-security-natural-security/ (11 December 2013)
24. Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R. & Morrison, D. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Integrating Ecol. Econ. Control Bioinvasions IEECB SI 52, 273-288 (2005).
25. Goodell, J. Goodbye Miami. Rolling Stone (20 June 2013).
26. Anonymous. You're going to get wet. The Economist (25 June 2013).
27. Campo-Flores, A. Flood fixes vex coastal areas. The Wall Street Journal (13 June 2013).
28. Williams, V.J. Identifying the economic effects of salt water intrusion after Hurricane Katrina. J. Sustain. Dev. 3, 29-37 (2010).
29. BenDor, T., Lester, T.W., Livengood, A., Davis, A. & Yonavjak, L. Estimating the size and impact of the ecological restoration economy. PLoS ONE 10, e0128339 (2015).
30. Carlson, R. The pace and proliferation of biological technologies. Biosecur. Bioterr. 1, 203-214 (2004).
31. Carlson, R. The Causes and Consequences of Bioeconomic Proliferation: Implications for U.S. Physical and Economic Security (Homeland Security Institute, 2012).
32. US National Security Council. National Strategy for Countering Biological Threats. (Office of the President of the United States, 2009).
33. Ledford, H. Garage biotech: life hackers. Nature 467, 650-652 (2010).
34. Carvalho, D.O. et al. Suppression of a field population of Aedes aegypti in Brazil by sustained release of transgenic male mosquitoes. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 9, e0003864 (2015).
35. Ezezika, O.C. & Singer, P.A. Genetically engineered oil-eating microbes for bioremediation: Prospects and regulatory challenges. Technol. Soc. 32, 331-335 (2010).
36. Gisbert, C. et al. A plant genetically modified that accumulates Pb is especially promising for phytoremediation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 303, 440-445 (2003).
37. US Office of Management and Budget. North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)-updates for 2017. Fed. Regist. 79, 29626-29629 (2014).