Consensus in a fuzzy environment: A bibliometric study

Procedia Computer Science

Volumn 55, Issue , 2015, Pages 660-667

  Cabrerizo, F J ^a   Martinez M A ^b   Herrera, M ^a   Herrera Viedma, E ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE EDUCACIÓN A DISTANCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD INTERNACIONAL DE LA RIOJA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bibliometric study; Consensus; Fuzzy environment

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

BIBLIOMETRIC; CONSENSUS; CONSENSUS MODELS; FUZZY ENVIRONMENTS; GROUP DECISION MAKING; HUMAN PERCEPTION; RESEARCH FIELDS; STATE OF THE ART;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84960905563     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18770509     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.065     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Kacprzyk J, Zadrozny S. Towards a general and unified characterization of individual and collective choice functions under fuzzy and nonfuzzy preferences and majority via the ordered weighted average operators. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 2009;24: 4- 26.
2. Kacprzyk J. Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1986;18:105-118.
3. Butler CT, Rothstein A. On conflict and consensus: A handbook on formal consensus decision making. Takoma Park; 2006.
4. Bezdek J, Spillman B, Spillman R. Fuzzy measures of preferences and consensus in group decision making. In: Proceedings of 1977 IEEE Conference on Decision Control. 1977, p. 1303-1308.
5. Bezdek J, Spillman B, Spillman R. A fuzzy relation space for group decision theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1978;1:255-268.
6. Spillman B, Bezdek J, Spillman R. Coalition analysis with fuzzy sets. Kybernetes 1979;8:203-211.
7. Loewer B. Special issue on consensus. Synthese 1985;62: 1-122.
8. Loewer B, Laddaga R. Destroying the consensus. Synthese 1985;62:79-96.
9. Zadeh LA. A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 1983;9:149-184.
10. Yager RR. On ordered weighted averaging operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 1988;18:183-190.
11. Fedrizzi M, Kacprzyk J, Nurmi H. Consensus degrees under fuzzy majorities and fuzzy preferences using owa (ordered weighted average) operators. Control Cybernet 1993;22:78-86.
12. Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H. Owa operators in group decision making and consensus reaching under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority. In: Yager RR, Kacprzyk J, editors. The ordered weighted averaging operators: Theory and applications. Boston: Kluwer; 1997, p. 193-206.
13. Zadrozny S, Kacprzyk J. Issues in the practical use of the owa operators in fuzzy querying. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 2009;33:307-325.
14. Kacprzyk J. Group decision-making with a fuzzy majority via linguistic quantifiers. Part I: A consensory-like pooling. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal 1985;16:119-129.
15. Kacprzyk J. Group decision-making with a fuzzy majority via linguistic quantifiers. Part II: A competitive-like pooling. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal 1985;16:131-144.
16. Fedrizzi M, Kacprzyk J. On measuring consensus in the setting of fuzzy preference relations. In: Kacprzyk J, Roubens M, editors. Non-conventional preference relations in decision making. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer; 1988, p. 129-141.
17. Nurmi H. Approaches to collective decision making with fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1981;6:249-259.
18. Kacprzyk J. On some fuzzy cores and soft consensus measures in group decision making. In: Bezdek J, editor. The analysis of fuzzy information. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1987, p. 119-130.
19. Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M. Soft consensus measure for monitoring real consensus reaching processes under fuzzy preferences. Control Cybernet 1986;15:309-323.
20. Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M. A "soft" measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences. European Journal of Operational Research 1988;34:316-325.
21. Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M. A 'human-consistent' degree of consensus based on fuzzy logic with linguistic quantifiers. Mathematical Social Sciences 1989;18:275-290.
22. Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 1965;8:338-353.
23. Groot MMD. Reaching consensus. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1974;69:118-121.
24. Lehrer K, Wagner C. Rational Consensus in Science and Society. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company; 1981.
25. French S. Consensus of opinion. European Journal of Operational Research 1981;7:332-340.
26. Coch L, French F.R.P. Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations 1948;1:512-532.
27. French J.R.P. A formal theory of social power. Psychological Review 1956;63:181-194.
28. Harary F. On the measurement of structural balance. Behavioral Science 1959;4:316-323.
29. Cabrerizo FJ, Moreno JM, Pérez IJ, Herrera-Viedma E. Analyzing consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making: Advantages and drawbacks. Soft Computing 2010;14:451-463.
30. Herrera-Viedma E, Cabrerizo FJ, Kacprzyk J, Pedrycz W. A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment. Information Fusion 2014;17:4-13.
31. Palomares I, Estrella FJ, Martínez L, Herrera F. Consensus under a fuzzy context: Taxonomy, analysis framework AFRYCA and experimental case of study. Information Fusion 2014;20:252-271.
32. Kitchenham B. Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Tech. rep., TR/SE0401 Software Engineering Group. Department of Computer Science: Keele University; 2004.
33. Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JV. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation; 2009.
34. Cooper H. Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach. SAGE Publications, Inc; 2010.
35. Borestein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley; 2009.
36. Börner K, Chen C. Boyack KW. Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 2003;37:179- 255.
37. Sinclair J, Cardew-Hall M. The folksonomy tag cloud: When is it useful?. Journal of Information Science 2008;34:15-29.
38. Hassan-Montero Y, Herrero-Solana V. Improving tag-clouds as visual information retrieval interfaces. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multidis Information Sciences and Technologies. Mérida: Spain; 2006.
39. Cobo MJ, López-Herrera, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2011;62:1382-1402.
40. Cobo MJ, López-Herrera, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool. Journal of the American Society for Informaiton Science and Technology 2012;63:1609-1630.
41. Garfield E. Citation indexing: its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1979.
42. Martínez M, Herrera M, López-Gijón J, Herrera-Viedma E. H-classics: characterizing the concept of citation classics through h-index. Scientometrics 2014;98:1971-1983.
43. Moed H. New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis 2009;57:13-18.
44. Wilson W, Eliza LW, Faye C, Cheung A. Citation classics in the integrative and complementary medicine literature: 50 frequently cited articles. European Journal of Integrative Medicine 2012;4:e77-e83.