Outcomes of Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer with minimal amounts (<6%) vs ≥6% of Gleason pattern 4 tissue in needle biopsy specimens

Annals of Diagnostic Pathology

Volumn 20, Issue , 2016, Pages 48-51

  Kir, Gozde ^a   Seneldir, Hatice ^a   Gumus, Eyup ^a  

^a Umraniye Education and Research Hospital Otolaryngology Clinic Umraniye   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Gleason pattern 4; Modified Gleason grading; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ARTICLE; CANCER GROWTH; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER TISSUE; FOLLOW UP; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEEDLE BIOPSY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERINEURAL INVASION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; TUMOR BIOPSY; CANCER GRADING; DISEASE COURSE; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MORTALITY; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RISK FACTOR; TUMOR RECURRENCE;

BIOPSY, NEEDLE; DISEASE PROGRESSION; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; NEOPLASM GRADING; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84960869053     PISSN: 10929134     EISSN: 15328198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2015.10.013     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. J.I. Epstein, W.C. Jr Allsbrook, M.B. Amin, and L.L. Egevad The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma Am J Surg Pathol 29 2005 1228 1242
2. J.I. Epstein An update of the Gleason grading system J Urol 183 2010 433 440
3. J.I. Epstein, W.C. Jr Allsbrook, M.B. Amin, and L.L. Egevad Update on the Gleason grading system for prostate cancer: results of an international consensus conference of urologic pathologists Adv Anat Pathol 13 2006 57 59
4. S.W. Fine, M.B. Amin, D.M. Berney, A. Bjarhell, L. Egevad, J.I. Epstein, and et al. A contemporary update on pathology reporting for prostate cancer: biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens Eur Urol 62 2002 20 39
5. B. Helpap, and L. Egevad The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens Virchows Arch 449 2006 622 627
6. P. Zareba, J. Zhang, A. Yilmaz, and K. Trpkov The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus on Gleason grading in contemporary practice Histopathology 55 2009 384 391
7. H. Uemura, K. Hoshino, T. Sasaki, Y. Miyoshi, H. Ishiquro, Y. Inayama, and et al. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens BJU Int 103 2009 1190 1194
8. A. Billis, M.S. Guimaraes, L.L. Freitas, L. Meirelles, L.A. Magna, and U. Ferreia The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies J Urol 180 2008 548 552
9. C.C. Huang, M.X. Kong, M. Zhou, A.B. Rosenkrantz, S.S. Taneja, J. Melamed, and et al. Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of Gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen Am J Surg Pathol 38 2014 1096 1101
10. T.M. Morgan, M.V. Meng, M.R. Cooperberg, J.E. Cowan, V. Weinberg, P.R. Carroll, and et al. A risk-adjusted definition of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 17 2014 174 179
11. J.R. Stark, S. Perner, M.J. Stampfer, J.A. Sinnot, S. Finn, A.S. Eisenstein, and et al. Gleason score and lethal prostate cancer: does 3 + 4 = 4 + 3? J Clin Oncol 27 2009 3459 3464
12. D.V. Makarov, H. Sanderson, A.W. Partin, and J.I. Epstein Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores? J Urol 167 2002 2440 2442
13. A. Amin, A. Partin, and J.I. Epstein Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: relation of primary pattern 3 or 4 to pathological stage and progression after radical prostatectomy J Urol 186 2011 1286 1290
14. A.C. Reese, J.E. Cowan, J.S. Brajtbord, C.R. Harris, P.R. Carrol, and M.R. Cooperberg The quantitative Gleason score improves prostate cancer risk assessment Cancer 118 2012 6046 6054
15. K.D. Berg, M.A. Røder, K. Brasso, B. Vainer, and P. Iversen Primary Gleason pattern in biopsy Gleason score 7 is predictive of adverse histopathological features and biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy Scand J Urol 48 2014 168 176
16. F. Dong, C. Wang, A.B. Farris, S. Wu, H. Lee, A.F. Olumi, and et al. Impact on the clinical outcome of prostate cancer by the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology modified Gleason grading system Am J Surg Pathol 36 2012 838 843
17. J. Alcover, and X. Filella Identification of candidates for active surveillance: should we change the current paradigm? Clin Genitourin Cancer 2015 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.06.001 [pii: S1558-7673(15)00126-3]
18. G. Gandaglia, J. Schiffmann, T. Schlomm, N. Fossati, M. Moschini, N. Suardi, and et al. Identification of pathologically favorable disease in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients: implications for active surveillance candidates selection Prostate 75 2015 1484 1491
19. G. Ploussard, H. Isbarn, A. Briganti, P. Sooriakumaran, C.I. Surcel, L. Salomon, and et al. Can we expand active surveillance criteria to include biopsy Gleason 3 + 4 prostate cancer? A multi-institutional study of 2323 patients Urol Oncol 33 2015 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.07.007
20. R. Schiavina, M. Borghesi, E. Brunocilla, D. Romaqnoli, D. Diazzi, F. Giunchi, and et al. The biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4 in a single core does not necessarily reflect an unfavourable pathological disease after radical prostatectomy in comparison with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3: looking for larger selection criteria for active surveillance candidates Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 18 2015 270 275
21. D.I. Quinn, S.M. Henshall, P.C. Brenner, R. Koonere, D. Golovsky, G.F. O'Neill, and et al. Prognostic significance of preoperative factors in localized prostate carcinoma treated with radical prostatectomy: importance of percentage of biopsies that contain tumor and the presence of biopsy perineural invasion Cancer 97 2003 1884 1893