The empirical gap in jurisprudence: A comprehensive study of the supreme court of Canada

The Empirical Gap in Jurisprudence: A Comprehensive Study of the Supreme Court of Canada

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-260

  Muttart, Daved ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84960798651     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (357)

1. Abraham, H.J. The Judicial Process, 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998
2. Adams, D.M. Skepticism and the Apologetics of Law. (1990) 3 C.J.L.J. 69
3. Agresto, J. The Supreme Court and Constitutional Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984
4. Allan, J. Positively Fabulous: Why It Is Good to Be a Legal Positivist. (1997) 10 C.J.L.J. 231
5. Altman, A. Legal Realism, Critical Legal Studies, and Dworkin. (1986) 15 Philosophy and Public Affairs 205
6. Anglin, F.A. Stare Decisis and Other Subjects as Viewed in the Civil Law and at Common Law. Address given to the Jeune Barreau de Québec, Ottawa, 2 February 1922
7. Archibald, B.P. The Canadian Hearsay Revolution: Is Half a Loaf Better Than No Loaf at All? (1999) 25 Queen's L.J. 1
8. Arthurs, H. (Chair). Law and Learning. Report to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada by the Consultative Group on Research and Education in Law. Ottawa; Minister of Supply and Services Canada, 1983
9. Austin, A. The Empire Strikes Back: Outsiders and the Struggle over Legal Education. New York: New York University Press, 1998
10. Bahá'u'lláh. The Hidden Words. Wilmette, IL: Baha'i Publishing Trust, 1982
11. Balcome, R. et al. Supreme Court of Canada Decision-Making: The Benchmarks of Rand, Kerwin and Martland. Toronto: Carswell, 1990
12. Balkin, J.M. Deconstructive Practice and Legal Theory. (1987) 96 Yale L.J. 743
13. Band, P. Stare Decisis: Are Appellate Courts Bound by Their Previous Decisions? (1998) 20 Advocates Quarterly 345
14. Banks, C.P. Reversals of Precedent and Judicial Policy-Making: How Judicial Conceptions of Stare Decisis in the U.S. Supreme Court Influence Social Change. (1999) 32 Akron L. Rev. 233
15. Barron, S. Supreme Life. (1998) 12 (no. 7) Canadian Lawyer, 20
16. Bastarache, M. Supreme Advice to the Successful Litigator: Advocacy in the Supreme Court of Canada. Address to the County of Carleton Law Association. Ottawa and Quebec, 6 and 7 November, 1998
17. Bateman, T. Rights Application Doctrine and the Clash of Constitutionalisms in Canada. (1998) 31 Can. J. Pol. Sci. 3
18. Batten, J. Judges. Toronto: Macmillan, 1986
19. Bayefsky, A.F. ed. Legal Theory Meets Legal Practice. Edmonton: Academic Printing and Publishing, 1988
20. Beatty, D. Constitutional Conceits: The Coercive Authority of Courts. (1987) 37 U.T.L.J. 183
21. Beatty, D.M. Talking Heads and the Supremes. Toronto: Carswell, 1990
22. Beaudoin, G-A. ed. The Supreme Court of Canada: Proceedings of the October 1985. Conference. Cowansville, QC: Les Editions Yvon Blais Inc., 1986
23. Bell, J. Policy Arguments in Judicial Decisions. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983
24. Belliotti, R.A. The Rule of Law and the Critical Studies Movement. (1986) 24 U.W.O.L.R. 67
25. Benoit, W.L. Attorney Argumentation and Supreme Court Opinions. (1989) 26 Argumentation and Advocacy 22
26. Benseh, S.C., & Reddick, M. Overruled: An Event History Analysis of Lower Court Reaction to Supreme Court Alteration of Precedent. (2002) 64 J. of Politics 534
27. Binnie, I. A Survivor's Guide to Advocacy in the Supreme Court of Canada. (1999) 18 Advocates' Soc. J. 13
28. Bix, B. The Application (and Mis-Application) of Wittgenstein's Rule-Following Considerations to Legal Theory. (1990) 3 C.J.L.J. 107
29. Boeddu, G., & Haigh, R. Terms of Convenience: Examining Constitutional Overrulings by the High Court. (2003) 31 Fed. L. Rev. 167
30. Bourdieu, P., & Terdiman, R. The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field. (1987) 38 Hastings L.J. 805
31. Bowen, D.R. Sociological Characteristics of Judges. (unpublished manuscript)
32. Bowman, S.W. Interpretation of Tax Legislation: The Evolution of Purposive Analysis. (1995) 43 Cdn. Tax J. 1167
33. Braithwaite, J. Rules and Principles: A Theory of Legal Certainty. (2002) 27 Australian J. of Legal Philosophy 46
34. Bratz, D.C. Stare Decisis in Lower Courts: Predicting the Demise of Supreme Court Precedent. (1984) 60 Wash. L. Rev. 87
35. Brenner, S., & Spaeth, H.J. Stare Indecisis: Alteration of Precedent in USSC, 1946-1992. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995
36. Brenner, S.W. Precedent Inflation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1992
37. Breslin, J.M. Making Inclusive Positivism Compatible with Razian Authority. (2001) C.J.L.J. 133
38. Brewer, S., ed. Evolution and Revolution in Theories of Legal Reasoning: Nineteenth Century through the Present. New York: Garland Publishing, 1998
39. Brewer, S., ed. Logic, Probability, and Presumptions in Legal Reasoning. New York: Garland Publishing, 1998
40. Brewer, S., ed. Precedents, Statutes, and Analysis of Legal Concepts. New York: Garland Publishing, 1998
41. Brewer, S., ed. Moral Theory and Legal Reasoning. New York: Garland Publishing, 1998
42. Brewer, S., ed. Scientific Models of Legal Reasoning: Economics, Artificial Intelligence, and the Physical Sciences. New York: Garland Publishing, 1998
43. Brodie, I., Friends of the Courts: The Privileging of Interest Group Litigants in Canada. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2002
44. Brown, H.S., Crane, B.A., & Allard, L. Leave to Appeal Applictions: The 1993-94 Term. (1995) 6 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. (2nd) 545
45. Brown, H.S., Crane, B.A., & Date, C.J. Annual Report on Applications for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, 1996-97. (1998) 9 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. (2nd) 431
46. Brown, H.S., Crane, B.A., & Ebos, M.R. Annual Report on Applications for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, 1997-98. (1999) 10 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. (2nd) 513
47. Brown, H.S. Crane, B.A., & Imerti, V. Annual Report on Applications for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, 1995-1996. (1997) 8 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. (2nd) 500
48. Brown, H.S., Crane, B.A., & Jolicoeur, M. Annual Report on Applications for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada: The 1992-93 Term. (1994) 5 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. (2nd) 1
49. Brown, H.S. Crane, B.A., & Lemieux, K. Leave to Appeal Applications: The 1994-95 Term. (1996) 7 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. (2nd) 421
50. Brown, H.S., Crane, B.A., & McNulty, C. Annual Report on Applications for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, 1999-2000. (2000) 13 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. (2nd) 335
51. Brown, H.S., Crane, B.A., & Tourigny, C. Annual Report on Applications for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, 1998-99. (2000) 11 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. (2nd) 517
52. Brown, H.S., Crane, B.A., & Zubec, J.-P. Annual Report on Applications for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, 2001-2002. (2002) 18 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. (2nd) 413
53. Bryant, A.W., Gold, M., Stevenson, H.M., & Northrup, D. Public Attitudes toward the Exclusion of Evidence: Section 24(2) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. (1990) 69 Can. Bar Rev. 1
54. Burton, S.J. Judging in Good Faith. Oakleigh, Australia: Cambridge University Press, 1992
55. Bushnell, S.I., The Captive Court: A Study of the Supreme Court of Canada. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1992
56. Bushnell, S.I. Leave to Appeal Applications to the Supreme Court of Canada: A Matter of Public Importance. (1982) 3 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. 479
57. Bushnell, S.I. Leave to Appeal Applications: The 1985-86 Term. (1987) 9 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. 467
58. Bushnell, S.I. Leave to Appeal Applications: The 1986-87 Term. (1988) 10 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. 361
59. Bushnell, S.I. Leave to Appeal Applications: The 1987-88 Term. (1989) 11 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. 383
60. Callen, C.R. From Theory to Practice: 'Intelligent' Procedures for Drawing Inferences in Static and Dynamic Legal Environments. Othello Could not Optimize: Economics, Hearsay, and Less Adversary Systems. (2001) 22 Cardozo L. Rev. 1791
61. Cameron, J. Dialogue and Hierarchy in Charter Interpretation: A Comment on R. v. Mills. (2001) 38 Alta. L. Rev. 1051
62. Campbell, T., and Goldsworthy, J. eds. Judicial Power, Democracy and Legal Positivism. Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate, 2000
63. Canadian Bar Association. Report on the Appointment of Judges in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Bar Foundation, 1985
64. Canadian Bar Association. Report on the Independence of the Judiciary. Ottawa: Canadian Bar Foundation, 1985
65. Canadian Bar Review. The Supreme Court of Canada: Legacy and Challenges. Commemorative edition on the 125th Anniversary of the Supreme Court of Canada. (2000) 79-80 Can. Bar Rev.
66. Caparros, E. Le travail de la femme d'un 'rancher': Une décision renversante de la Cour Suprême. (1974) 15 C. de D. 180
67. Capurso, T.J. How Judges Judge: Theories on Judicial Decision Making. (1999) 29 U. Balt. L.F. 5
68. Carroll, H.N. Stare Decisis and Supreme Court of Canada. Master of law thesis, University of Manitoba, 1964
69. Case, R. Understanding Judicial Reasoning. Toronto: Thompson Educational Publishing, 1997
70. Cass, R.A. Judging: Norms and Incentives of Retrospective Decision-Making. (1995) 75 B.U.L. Rev. 941
71. Casswell, D. A Prescriptive Model for Decision-Making in the Supreme Court of Canada. (1982) 14 Ottawa L. Rev. 126
72. Choudhry, S., & Hunter, C.E. Measuring Judicial Activism on the Supreme Court of Canada: A Comment on Newfoundland (Treasury Board) v. NAPE. (2003) 48 McGill L.J. 525, 546
73. Clayton, C.W., & Gillman, H., eds. Supreme Court Decision-Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999
74. Conley, J.M., & O'Barr, W.M. Rules versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990
75. Cooper, C.J. Stare Decisis: Precedent and Principle in Constitutional Adjudication. (1988) 73 Cornell L. Rev. 401
76. Corsi, J.R. Judicial Politics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984
77. Coser, L.A. Masters of Sociological Thought: Ideas in Historical and Social Context. 2nd ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1977
78. Crane, B.A., & Brown, H.S., Leave to Appeal Applications: The 1988-89 Term. (1990) 1 Sup. Ct. L. Rep. (2nd) 483
79. Crane, B.A., & Brown, H.S. Leave to Appeal Applications: The 1989-90 Term. (1991) 2 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. (2nd) 473
80. Crane, B.A. & Brown, H.S., Leave to Appeal Applications: The 1990-91 Term. (1992) 3 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. (2nd) 381
81. Crane, B.A., Brown, H.S., & Thompson, G. Leave to Appeal Applications: The 1991-92 Term. (1993) 4 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. (2nd) 27
82. Cross, F.B. Decisionmaking in the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals. (2003) 91 Cal. L. Rev. 1457
83. CTV. A Gift of Freedom, W5, 8 June 1986
84. Dawkins, R. Bees Are Easily Distracted. (1969) 165 Science 751
85. DeCoste, F.C. Political Corruption, Judicial Selection, and the Rule of Law. (2000) 38 Alta. L. Rev. 654
86. DeCoste, F.C. Redeeming the Rule of Law: Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law, T.R.S. Allan. (2002) 39 Alta. L. Rev. 1004
87. Delisle, R.J. Collins: An Unjustified Distinction. (1987) 56 C.R. (3rd) 216
88. Des Rosiers, N. The Courts in a Deliberative Democracy. Asking the Right Questions. Notes for a speech given on 24 April 2001 to the Conference of appeal courts organized by the National Judicial Institute, Montreal. Available online at http://www.lcc.gc.ca/en/pc/speeches/20010424.asp
89. Devlin, P. The Judge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979
90. Devlin, R., ed. Canadian Perspectives on Legal Theory. Toronto: Emond Montgomery Publications Ltd., 1991
91. Devlin, R., MacKay, A.W., & Kim, N. Reducing the Democratic Deficit: Representation, Diversity and the Canadian Judiciary, or Towards a 'Triple P' Judiciary. (2000) 38 Alta. L. Rev. 734
92. Devlin, R.F., Jurisprudence for Judges: Why Legal Theory Matters for Social Context Education. (2001), 27 Queen's L.J. 161
93. Devlin, R.F. Mapping Legal Theory. (1994) 32 Alta. L. Rev. 602
94. Dickson, B. The Judiciary: Law Interpreters or Law Makers. (1983) Man. L.J. 1
95. Dickson, B. The Role and Function of Judges. (1980) 14 Gazette 138
96. Doering, R.L. Murdoch v. Murdoch and the Law of Constructive Trusts. (1974) 6 Ottawa L. Rev. 568
97. Douzinas, C., Warrington, R., & McVeigh, S. Postmodern Jurisprudence: The Law of Text in the Texts of Law. London and New York: Routledge, 1991
98. Dworkin, R. Darwin's New Bulldog. (1998) Harv. L. Rev. 1718
99. Dworkin, R. Law's Empire. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1986
100. Dworkin, R. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978
101. Edinger, E. Retrospectivity in Law. (1995) 29 U.B.C.L. Rev. 5
102. Ehrcke, W.F., Stare Decisis. (1995) 53 Advocate 847
103. Epp, C. Do Bills of Rights Matter? The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. (1996) 90 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 765
104. Epstein, L., et al. The Supreme Court Compendium: Data, Decisions and Development. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2003
105. Epstein, L., & King, G. The Rules of Inference. (2002) 69 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1
106. Eskridge, W.N., Jr. Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions. (1991) 101 Yale L. J. 331
107. Eskridge, W.N., Jr. Reneging on History? Playing the Court/Congress/President Civil Rights Game. (1991) 79 Cal. L. Rev. 613
108. Fallon, R.H., Jr. Stare Decisis and the Constitution: An Essay on Constitutional Methodology. (2001) 76 N.Y.U. Law Rev. 570
109. Feldman, S.M., American Legal Thought from Premodernism to Postmodernism: An Intellectual Voyage. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000
110. Fish, S. Doing What Comes Naturally. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1989
111. Fish, S. The Trouble with Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999
112. Flemming, R.B. Tournament of Appeals: Granting Judicial Review in Canada. Vancouver; UBC Press, 2004
113. Flemming, R.B., & Krutz, G.S. Repeat Litigators and Agenda Setting on the Supreme Court of Canada. (2002) 35 Can. J. of Pol. Sci. 811
114. Flemming, R.B., & Krutz, G.S. Selecting Appeals for Judicial Review in Canada: A Replication of the Multivariate Test of American Hypotheses. (2002) 64 J. of Politics 232
115. Fletcher, J.F., & Howe, P. Canadian Attitudes towards the Charter and the Courts in Comparative Perspective. (2000) 6 (no. 3) Choices 11
116. Fletcher, J.F., & Howe, P. Supreme Court Cases and Court Support: The State of Canadian Public Opinion. (2000) 6 (no. 3) Choices 30
117. Freed, T.E. Is Stare Decisis Still the Lighthouse Beacon of Supreme Court Jurisprudence? A Critical Analysis. (1996) 57 Ohio St. L.J. 1767
118. Freeman, M.D.A. Lloyd's Introduction to Jurisprudence. 7th ed. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2001
119. Friedland, M.L. A Place Apart: Judicial Independence and Accountability in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Judicial Council, 1995
120. Gambrill, D. Historian Has a Few Words on Court's 125th Anniversary: Supreme Court Has Legitimacy Problems. (2001) Law Times, 16 October, xx.
121. George, R.P., ed., The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996
122. Gibson, D. Judges as Legislators: Not Whether but How. (1987) 25 Alta. L. Rev. 249
123. Gibson, D. & Baldwin, J.K., eds, Law in a Cynical Society? Opinion and Law in the 1980s. Vancouver: Carswell Legal Publications, 1985
124. Gibson, J.L. & Caldeira, G.A. The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court. (1992) 36 Am. J. Pol. Sci. 638
125. Gibson, J.L., Caldeira, G.A., & Baird, V.A. On the Legitimacy of National High Courts. (1998) 92 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 343
126. Gibson, J.L., Caldeira, G.A., & Spence, L.K. Measuring Attitudes towards the United States Supreme Court. (2003) 47Am. J. Pol. Sci. 354
127. Gibson, J.L., Caldeira, G.A., & Spence, L.K. The Supreme Court and the U.S. Presidential Election of 2000: Wounds, Self-Inflicted or Otherwise? (2003) 33 Br. J. Pol. Sci. 535.
128. Giudice, M. Unconstitutionality, Invalidity, and Charter Challenges. (2002) 15 Can. J.L. & Juris. 69
129. Gold, M., et al. Public Support for the Exclusion of Unconstitutionally Obtained Evidence. (1990) 1 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. (2d) 555
130. Gold, M.E. The Mask of Objectivity: Politics and Rhetoric in the Supreme Court of Canada. (1985) 7 Sup. Ct. Law Rev. 455
131. Golding, M.P. Legal Reasoning. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1984
132. Goldman, S. Politics, Judges and the Administration of Justice. Unpublished manuscript
133. Goldstein, L. ed. Precedent in Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987
134. Goodrich, P. Historical Aspects of Legal Interpretation. (1986) 61 Ind. L.J. 331
135. Goodrich, P. Legal Discourse: Studies in Linguistics, Rhetoric and Legal Analysis. New York: St Martins Press, 1987
136. Goodrich, P. Reading the Law: A Critical Introduction to Legal Method and Techniques. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986
137. Greene, I. The Charter of Rights. Toronto: Lorimer, 1989
138. Greene, I. The Doctrine of Judicial Independence Developed by the Supreme Court of Canada. (1988) O.H.L.J. 177
139. Greene, I., et al. Final Appeal: Decision-Making in Canadian Courts of Appeal. Toronto: Lorimer, 1998
140. Guest, S. ed. Positivism Today. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth Publishing, 1996
141. Guest, S. Ronald Dworkin. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1997
142. Guthrie, C. Rachlinski, J.J., & Wistrich, A.J. Inside the Judicial Mind. (2001) 86 Cornell L. Rev. 777
143. Haigh, R. A Kindler, Gentler Supreme Court? The Case of Burns and the Need for a Principled Approach to Overruling. (2001) 14 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. (2d) 139
144. Halewood, P.H. Performance and Pragmatism in Constitutional Interpretation. (1990) 3 C.J.L.J. 91
145. Halpin, A. Reasoning with Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001
146. Hamner Hill, H. H.L.A. Hart's Hermeneutic Positivism: On Some Methodological Difficulties in 'The Concept of Law.' (1990) 3 C.J.L.J. 113
147. Hart, H.L.A. American Jurisprudence through English Eyes: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream. (1977) 11 Georgia Law Rev. 969
148. Hart, H.L.A. The Concept of Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994
149. Heard, A.D. The Charter of Rights and the Supreme Court of Canada: The Importance of Which Judges Hear an Appeal. (1991) 24 Can. J. of Pol. Sci. 289
150. Heise, M. The Past, Present, and Future of Empirical Legal Scholarship: Judicial Decision Making and the New Empiricism. (2002) U. Ill. L. Rev. 819
151. Hellman, D. The Importance of Appearing Principled. (1995) 37 Ariz. L. Rev. 110
152. Hiebert, J.L. Charter Conflicts: What is Parliament's Role? Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2002
153. Hogg, P.W. Constitutional Law of Canada, Loose-leaf ed. Toronto: Carswell Thomson, 1997
154. Hogg, P.W. Equality as a Charter Value in Constitutional Interpretation. Paper delivered at the Sixth Annual Analysis of the Constitutional Decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada: 2002 Constitutional Cases, Osgoode Hall Law School, Toronto, 4 April 2003
155. Hogg, P.W., & Bushell, A.A. The Charter Dialogue between Courts and Legisla tures (Or Perhaps the Charter of Rights Isn't Such a Bad Thing After All). (1997) 35 O.H.L.J. 75
156. Hogg, P.W., & Thornton, A.A. The Charter Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures. Policy Options april 1999 at 19
157. Howe, P., & Russell, P. Judicial Power and Canadian Democracy. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2001
158. Hughes, P. Judicial Independence: Contemporary Pressures and Appropriate Responses. (2000) 80 Can. Bar Rev. 181
159. Hunt, A. ed. Reading Dworkin Critically. New York: Berg, 1992
160. Hunter, D. Reason Is Too Large: Analogy and Precedent in Law. (2001) 50 Emory L.J. 1197
161. Huscroft, G., & Brodie, I., eds. Constitutionalism in the Charter Era. Markham, ON: LexisNexis/Butterworths, 2004
162. Hutchinson, A.C. Casaubon's Ghosts: The Haunting of Legal Scholarship. (2001) 21 Legal Studies 65
163. Hutchinson, A.C. Hermeneutics and Critique in Legal Practice. Work-In-Progress: Gadamer, Tradition, and the Common Law. (2000) 76 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1015
164. Hutchinson, A.C. It's All in the Game: A Non-Foundational Account of Law and Adjudication. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000
165. Hutchinson, A.C. Of Judges, Democracy and Bus Driving. (1982) 26 L.S. Gazette 26
166. Hutchinson, A.C. Judges and Politics: An Essay from Canada. (2004) 24 Legal Studies 275
167. Hutchinson, A.C. A Postmodern's Hart: Taking Rules Sceptically. (1995) 58 Modern Law Rev. 788
168. Hutchinson, A.C. Towards Judicial Accountability: Are the Excuses Getting Lamer? (1996) 45 U.N.B.L.J. 97
169. Hutchinson, A.C. Work in Progress: Evolution and the Common Law. Cambridge: University Press, 2005
170. Hutchinson, A.C., & Monahan P.J., eds. The Rule of Law: Ideal or Ideology. Toronto: Carswell, 1987
171. Iacobucci, F. The Supreme Court of Canada: Its History, Powers and Responsibilities. (2002) 4 J. App. Prac. & Process 27
172. Jackson, B.S. Law, Fact and Narrative Coherence. Merseyside, UK: Deborah Charles Publications, 1988
173. Jacobson, P. Murdoch v. Murdoch: Just about What the Ordinary Rancher's Wife Does. (1974) 20 McGill L.J. 308
174. Jennex, D. Dworkin and the Doctrine of Judicial Discretion. (1992) 14 Dal. L.J. 473
175. Johnson, R. Taxing Choices: The Intersection of Class, Gender, Parenthood and the Law. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2002
176. Kairys, D., ed. The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique. 3rd ed. New York: Basic Books, 1998
177. Kaye, P. Parliament and the Courts: Who's Legislating Whom? (1998) Research at the Ontario Legislative Library
178. Keeton, R.E. Venturing to Do Justice, Reforming Private Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969
179. Kennedy, D. A Critique of Adjudication: fin de siècle Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997
180. Kennedy, D. Freedom and Constraint in Adjudication: A Critical Phenomenology. (1986) 36 J. of Legal Education 518
181. Kelly, J.B. Bureaucratic Activism and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms: The Department of Justice and Its Entry into the Centre of Government. (1999) 42 Can. Public Administration 476
182. Kelly, J.B. The Charter of Righs and Freedoms and the Rebalancing of Liberal Constitutionalism in Canada, 1982-1997. (1999) 37 O.H.L.J. 625
183. Kornhauser, L.A. An Economic Perspective on Stare Decisis. (1989) 65 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 63
184. Kornhauser, L.A. Response to Macey. (1989) 65 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 115
185. Kramer, M. Also among the Prophets: Some Rejoinders to Ronald Dworkin's Attacks on Legal Positivism. (1999) 12 C.J.L.J. 53
186. Kramer, M.H. In Defense of Legal Positivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999
187. Kress, K.J. Legal Reasoning and Coherence Theories: Dworkin's Rights Thesis, Retroactivity, and the Linear Order of Decisions. (1984) 72 Cal. L. Rev. 369
188. Kuhn, T.S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996
189. L'Heureux-Dubé, C. By Reason of Authority or by Authority of Reason. (1993) 27 U.B.C. Law Rev. 1
190. L'Heureux-Dubé, C. The Dissenting Opinion: Voice of the Future? (2000) 38 Osgoode Hall L.J. 495
191. L'Heureux-Dubé, C. What a Difference a Decade Makes: The Canadian Constitution and the Family since 1991. (2001) 27 Queen's L.J. 361
192. La Forest, G.V. Judicial Lawmaking, Creativity and Constraints. Address to symposium. Gérard V. La Forest at the Supreme Court of Canada 1985-1997, University of New Brunswick, 2002
193. Lambert, D. Ratio Decidendi and Obiter Dicta. (1993) 51 Advocate 689
194. Landes, W., & Posner, R.A. Legal Precedent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. (1976) 19 J. of Law and Economics 249, 271
195. Laskin, B. Judicial Integrity and the Supreme Court of Canada. (1978) 12 Gazette 116
196. Lazarus, E. Closed Chambers: The Rise, Fall and Future of the Modern Supreme Court. New York: Penguin Books, 1999
197. Lee, S. Judging Judges. London: Faber and Faber, 1988
198. Lee, E.G., III. Overruling Rhetoric: The Court's New Approach to Stare Decisis in Constitutional Cases. (2002) 33 U. Tol. L. Rev. 581.
199. Lee, T.R. Stare Decisis in Economic Perspective: An Economic Analysis of the Supreme Court's Doctrine of Precedent. (2000) 78 N.C.L. Rev. 643
200. Lee, T.R. Stare Decisis in Historical Perspective: From the Founding Era to the Rehnquist Court. (1999) 52 Vand. L. Rev. 647
201. Leiter, B. Positivism, Formalism, Realism: Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence. (1999) 99 Colum. L. Rev. 1138
202. Levinson, B.M. Deuteronomy and the Hermeneutics of Legal Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997
203. Levinson, S., & Mailloux, S., eds. Interpreting Law and Literature: A Hermeneutic Reader. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1988
204. Levmore, S. Ruling Majorities and Reasoning Pluralities. (2002) 3 Theoretical Inquiries into Law 87
205. Leyh, G., ed. Legal Hermeneutics: History, Theory and Practice. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of Californai Press, 1992
206. Lien, M.W. Technocentrism and the Soul of the Common Law Lawyer. (1998) 48 Am. U.L. Rev. 85
207. Lim, Y. An Empirical Analysis of Supreme Court Justices' Decision Making. (2000) 29 J. Legal Stud. 721
208. Llewellyn, K. 'The Bramble Bush.' In Introduction to Legal Studies, ed. N. Sargent et al., North York, ON: Captus Press, 1990
209. Llewellyn, K.N. Remarks on the Theory of Appellate Decision and the Rules or Canons about How Statutes Are to Be Construed. (1950) 3 Vand. L. Rev. 395
210. Lloyd, Lord, & Freeman, M.D.A. Lloyd's Introduction to Jurisprudence. 5th ed. London: Stevens and Sons, 1985
211. Losee, J. A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001
212. Lyons, D. Moral Aspects of Legal Theory: Essays on Law, Justice and Political Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993
213. MacCormick, N. Contemporary Legal Philosophy: The Rediscovery of Practical Reason. (1983) 10 J. Law & Soc. 1
214. MacCormick, N. H.L.A. Hart. London: Edward Arnold 1981
215. MacCormick, N. Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978
216. MacCormick, N. Reconstruction after Deconstruction: A Response to CLS. (1990) 10 Oxford J. Leg. Studies 539
217. MacCormick, N., & Summers, R.S. Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate/Dartmouth, 1997
218. Macey, J.R. The Internal and External Costs and Benefits of Stare Decisis. (1989) 65 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 93
219. MacGuigan, M. Precedent and Policy in the Supreme Court of Canada. (1967) 45 Can. Bar Rev. 627
220. MacKay, A.W., The Supreme Court of Canada and Federalism: Does/Should Anyone Care Anymore? (2000) 80 Can. Bar Rev. 241
221. MacPherson, J. Canadian Constitional Law and Madame Justice Bertha Wilson: Patriot, Visionary and Heretic. (1992) 15 Dalhousie L.J. 217
222. Malleson, K. The New Judiciary: The Effects of Expansion and Activism. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate/Dartmouth, 1999
223. Mandel, M. The Charter of Rights and the Legalization of Politics in Canada. Toronto: Thompson Educational Publishing, 1992
224. Manfredi, C.P. Judicial Power and the Charter: Canada and the Paradox of Liberal Constitutionalism. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1993
225. Manfredi, C.P. Feminist Activism in the Supreme Court. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2004
226. Manfredi, C.P. Judicial Power and the Charter: Canada and the Paradox of Liberal Constitutionalism. 2nd ed. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press, 2001
227. Manfredi, C.P. Judicial Power and the Charter: Three Myths and a Political Analysis. (2001) 14 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. (2d) 331
228. Marmor, A. Interpretation and Legal Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992
229. Marmor, A. No Easy Cases. (1990) 3 C.J.L.J. 61
230. Marshall, L.C. 'Let Congress Do It': The Case for an Absolute Rule of Statutory State Decisis. (1989) 88 Mich. L. Rev. 177
231. Marshall, T.D. Judicial Conduct and Accountability. Toronto: Carswell, 1995
232. Martin, S. Balancing Individual Rights to Equality and Social Goals. (2001) 80 Can Bar Rev. 299
233. Mayrand, A. L'autorité du précédent au Québec. (1994) 28 R.J.T. 761
234. McConnell, M.W. Fidelity in Constitutional Theory, Fidelity as Integrity: The Importance of Humility in Judicial Review. A Comment on Ronald Dworkin's 'Moral Reading' of the Constitution. (1997) 65 Fordham L. Rev. 1269
235. McCormick, P. Canada's Courts. Toronto: Lorimer, 1994
236. McCormick, P. Second Thoughts: Supreme Court Citation of Dissents and Separate Concurrences, 1949-1996. (2002) 81 Can. Bar Rev. 369
237. McCormick, P. Supreme at Last: The Evolution of the Supreme Court of Canada. Toronto: Lorimer, 2000
238. McCormick, P., and Greene, I., Judges and Judging. Toronto: Lorimer, 1990
239. McKinnon, C. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989
240. McLachlin, B. Courts, Legislatures, and Executives in the Post-Charter Era. Policy Options, June 1999, at 42
241. Mellinkoff, D. The Language of the Law. Boston: Little, Brown, 1963
242. Mellon, H., & Westmacott, M. Political Dispute and Judicial Review: Assessing the Work of the Supreme Court of Canada. Scarborough, ON: Nelson Thomson Learning, 2000
243. Miller, G.P. Pragmatics and the Maxims of Interpretation. (1990) Wis. L. Rev. 1179
244. Miller, M.C. A Comparison of the Judicial Role in the United States and in Canada. (1998) 22 Suffolk Transnat. L. Rev. 1
245. Mitchell, G.G. Developments in Constitutional Law, the 1997-98 Term: Activism and Accountability. (1999) 10 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. (2d) 84
246. Mitchell, W.J.T. ed. The Politics of Interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982
247. Modak-Truran, M.C. A Pragmatic Justification of the Judicial Hunch. (2001) 35 U. Rich. L. Rev. 55
248. Moles, R.N. Definition and Rule in Legal Theory: A Reassessment of H.L.A. Hart and the Positivist Tradition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987
249. Monahan, P.J. The Charter of Rights and Public Policy in Canada. (1992) 30 O.H.L.J. 501
250. Monahan, P.J. The Doctrines of Canadian Federalism. Unpublished essay
251. Monahan, P.J. Doing the Rules: An Assessment of the Federal 'Clarity Act' in Light of the Quebec Secession Reference. C.D. Howe Institute Commentary No. 135. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute, 2000
252. Monahan, P.J. Judicial Review and Democracy: A Theory of Judicial Review. (1987) 21 U.B.C. Law Rev. 87
253. Monahan, P.J. Politics and the Constitution. Toronto: Carswell, 1987
254. Monahan, P.J. The Law and Politics of Quebec Secession. (1995) 33 O.H.L.J. 1
255. Monahan, P.J. The Public Policy Role of the Supreme Court of Canada in the Secession Reference. (1999) 11 N.J.C.L. 65
256. Monahan, P.J. The Law and Politics of Quebec Secession. (1995) 33 O.H.L.J. 1
257. Monahan, P.J. The Supreme Court of Canada's Constitutional Decisions in 2001: An Overview. Paper presented at Constitutional Cases Conference, Osgoode Hall Law School, Toronto, 12 April 2002
258. Monahan, P.J. The Supreme Court of Canada in the 21st Century. (2001) 80 Can. Bar Rev. 376
259. Monahan, P.J. The Supreme Court and the Economy. Royal Commission on the Economic Union and Development Prospects for Canada. Toronto: Osgoode Hall Law School, 1984
260. Monahan, P.J. The Supreme Court's 1998 Constitutional Cases: The Debate over Judicial Activism Heats Up. (1999) 7 (nos 4-5) Canada Watch. Available online at http://www.robarts.yorku.ca/canadawatch/vol_7_4-5/default.htm. (accessed 4 March 2004)
261. Monahan, P.J. & Forbes, S.A., eds. Peter Cory at the Supreme Court of Canada 1989-1999. Winnipeg: Supreme Court of Canada Historical Society, 2001
262. Monahan, P.J. The Supreme Court's Constitutional Decisions 2003, at the Seventh Annual Analysis of the Constitutional Decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada: 2003 Constitutional Cases. Osgoode Hall Law School, Toronto, 2 April 2004
263. Monopoli, W. Dickson Warns Judges Not to Be Legislators. (1985) 12 (no. 8) National 17
264. Morawetz, T. The Epistemology of Judging: Wittgenstein and Deliberative Practices. (1990) 3 C.J.L.J. 35
265. Morawetz, T. Law's Premises, Law's Promise: Jurisprudence after Wittgenstein. Aldershot UK: Ashgate/Dartmouth, 2000
266. Morrison, W. Jurisprudence: From the Greeks to Post Modernism. London: Cavendish, 1997
267. Morton, F.L., ed. Law, Politics and the Judicial Process in Canada. Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 1992
268. Morton, F.L., ed. Law, Politics and the Judicial Process in Canada, 3rd ed. Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 2002
269. Morton, F.L., & Knopff, R. The Charter Revolution and the Court Party. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, 2000
270. Morton, F.L., Russell, P.H., & Riddell, T. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: A Descriptive Analysis of the First Decade, 1982-1992. (1996) 5 N.J.C.L. 1
271. Muldoon, P.R. Law of Intervention: Status and Practice. Aurora, ON: Canada Law Book, 1989
272. Murphy, J.D., & Rueter, R. Stare Decisis in Commonwealth Appellate Courts. Toronto: Butterworths, 1981
273. Nagel, S.S., Judicial Characteristics and Judicial Decision-Making. PhD diss., Northwestern University, 1961
274. O'Brien, D.M. Judges on Judging: Views from the Bench. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers, 1997
275. O'Hara, E. Social Constraint or Implicit Collusion? Toward a Game Theoretic Analysis of Stare Decisis. (1993) 24 Seton Hall L. Rev. 736
276. Ó Súilleabháin, M., ed. Legal Theory and Cases: Shifting Frontiers. Munich: Rainer Hampp Verlag, 1994
277. Peck, S.R. The Supreme Court of Canada, 1958-1966: A Search for Policy through Scalogram Analysis. (1967) 65 Can. Bar Rev. 666
278. Perell, P. Stare Decisis and Techniques of Legal Reasoning and Legal Argument. (1987) Legal Research Update 11
279. Perry, S.R. Judicial Obligation, Precedent and the Common Law. Toronto: Centre for Research on Public Law and Public Policy, 1987
280. Philipps, L. The Supreme Court of Canada's Tax Jurisprudence: What's Wrong with the Rule of Law. (2000) 79 C.B.R. 126
281. Pond, D.J. The Supreme Court of Canada and the Politics of Public Law. PhD diss., University of Toronto, 1992
282. Posner, R. The Problems of Jurisprudence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990
283. Posner, R.A. Legal Precedent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. (1976) 19 J. of Law and Economics 249
284. Posner, R.A. Overcoming Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995
285. Posner, R.A. The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999
286. Raz, J. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979
287. Rehnquist, J.C. The Power That Shall Be Vested in a Precedent: Stare Decisis, the Constitution and the Supreme Court. (1986) 66 B.U.L. Rev. 345
288. Revesz, R.L. Empirical Research and the Goals of Legal Scholarship: A Defense of Empirical Legal Scholarship. (2002) 69 U. Chi. L. Rev. 169
289. Roach, K. Constitutional and Common Law Dialogues between the Supreme Court and Canadian Legislatures. (2001) 80 Can. Bar Rev. 48
290. Roach, K. The Myths of Judicial Activism. (2001) 14 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. (2d) 297
291. Roach, K. The Supreme Court on Trial. Toronto: Irwin Law, 2001
292. Rosenberg, G.N. Incentives, Reputation, and the Glorious Determinants of Judicial Behavior. (2000) 68 U. Cin. L. Rev. 637
293. Rotenberg, C.L., & Lam, M. Stare Decisis: Oh Where Have You Gone? 28 Imm. L. Rev. (2d) 214
294. Rowland, C.K., &. Carp, R.A. Politics and Judgment in Federal District Courts. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1996
295. Russell, J.S. The Critical Legal Studies Challenge to Contemporary Mainstream Legal Philosophy. (1986) 18 Ottawa L. Rev. 1
296. Russell, P.H. The Judiciary in Canada: The Third Branch of Government. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1987
297. Russell, P.H. The Political Role of the Supreme Court of Canada in Its First Century. (1975) 53 Can. Bar Rev. 576
298. Salmond, J.W. The Theory of Judicial Precedents. (1900) 16 Law Quarterly Rev. 376, 381-2
299. Saunders, C., ed. Courts of Final Jurisdiction: The Mason Court in Australia. Annandale, NSW: Federation Press, 1996
300. Saywell, J.T. The Lawmakers: Judicial Power and the Shaping of Canadian Federalism. Toronto: Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History, University of Toronto Press, 2002
301. Schauer, F. Incentives, Reputation, and the Inglorious Determinants of Judicial Behavior. (2000) 68 U. Cin. L. Rev. 615
302. Schauer, F. Review of The Jurisprudence of Reasons: Law's Empire, by Ronald Dworkin. (1987) 85 Mich. L. Rev. 847
303. Schlag, P. Cannibal Moves: An Essay on the Metamorphoses of the Legal Distinction. (1988) 40 Stan. L. Rev. 929
304. Schmitz, C. 'Activism' Critics Posing Threat to Judicial Independence: Dubé. (1999) 19 (no. 16) Lawyer's Weekly 1
305. Schubert, G., & Danelski, D., eds. Comparative Judicial Behaviour: Cross-Cultural Decision-Making in the East and West. Toronto: Oxford University Press; 1969
306. Schubert, G.A. The Judicial Mind: The Attitudes and Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices 1946-1963. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1965
307. Sebok, A.J. Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998
308. Segal, J.A., & Spaeth, H.J. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993
309. Segal, J.A., & Spaeth, H.J. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002
310. Sharpe, R.J., & Roach, K. Brian Dickson: A Judge's Journey. Toronto: Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History, University of Toronto Press, 2003
311. Siltala, R. A Theory of Precedent: From Analytical Positivism to a Post-Analytical Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000
312. Simpson, A.W.B., ed. Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence. 2nd ser. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973
313. Singer, J.W. The Player and the Cards: Nihilism and Legal Theory. (1984) 94 Yale L.J. 1
314. Sisk, G.K., & Heise, M. Judges and Ideology: Public and Academic Debates about Statistical Measures. (2005) 99 Nw. U.L. Rev. 743, 759
315. Sittiwong, P. Canadian Supreme Court Decisions, 1949-1980. MA thesis, North Texas University, 1985
316. Slattery, B. Are Constitutional Cases Political? (1989) 2 Sup. Ct. Rev. (2nd) 507
317. Smith, G.A. Wittgenstein and the Sceptical Fallacy. (1990) 3 C.J.L.J. 155
318. Snell, J.G., & Vaughan, F. The Supreme Court of Canada: History of the Institution. Toronto: Osgoode Society, 1985
319. Solan, L.M. The Language of Judges. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1993
320. Songer, D.R., & Johnson, S.W. Attitudinal Decision Making in the Supreme Court of Canada. Paper delivered at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, 25-8 April 2002
321. Soper, P. A Theory of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984
322. Spaeth, H.J., & Segal, J.A. Majority Rule or Minority Will: Adherence to Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999
323. Stearns, M.L. The Condorcet Jury Theorem and Judicial Decisonmaking: A Reply to Saul Levmore. (2002) 3 Theoretical Inquiries into Law 125
324. Sterett, S. Politics and Jurisprudence in the British Courts. (1988) 1 C.J.L.J. 173
325. Stevens, J.P. The Life Span of a Judge-Made Rule. (1983) 58 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 1
326. Stone, J. Precedent and Law: Dynamics of Common Law Growth. Sydney, NSW; Butterworths, 1985
327. Stratman, J.F. Investigating Persuasive Processes in Legal Discourse in Real Time: Cognitive Biases and Rhetorical Strategy in Appeal Court Briefs. (1994) 17 Discourse Processes 1
328. Stravopoulos, N. Objectivity in Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996
329. Stuart, D. Charter Justice in Canadian Criminal Law. Toronto: Carswell, 2001
330. Stuart, D. Zigzags on Rights of Accused: Brittle Majorities Manipulate Weasel Words of Dialogue, Deference and Charter Values. Paper prepared for the Sixth Annual Analysis of the Constitutional Decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada Conference, Osgoode Hall Law School, Toronto, 4 April 2003
331. Sturgess, G., & Chubb, P. Judging the World: Law and Politics in the World's Leading Courts. Sydney, NSW: Butterworths, 1988
332. Sugarman, S.D. A New Approach to Tort Doctrine: Taking the Best from the Civil Law and Common Law of Canada. (2002) 17 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. 375
333. Sugunasiri, S.M. Contextualism: The Supreme Court's New Standard of Judicial Analysis and Accountability. (1999) 22 Dalhousie L.J. 126
334. Sullivan, R. Statutory Interpretation in the Supreme Court of Canada (1998-9) 30 Ottawa L. Rev. 175
335. Summers, R.S. Instrumentalism and American Legal Theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1982
336. Sunstein, C.R. Of Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning. (2001) 8 U. Chi. L. Sch. Roundtable 29
337. Sunstein, C.R. Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996
338. Tibbets, J. Farewell Claire. Canadian Lawyer, September 2002, at 38
339. Tiersma, P.M. Linguistic Issues in the Law. (1993) 69 Language 113
340. Twining, W. Law in Context: Enlarging a Discipline. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997
341. Unger, R.M. The Critical Legal Studies Movement (1983) 96 Harv. L. Rev. 561
342. von Frisch, K. Honeybees: Do They Use Direction and Distance Information Provided by Their Dances? (1967) 158 Science 1072
343. Walker, L., & Monahan, J. Social Facts: Scientific Methodology as Legal Precedent. (1988) 76 Calif. L. Rev. 877
344. Waluchow, W. J. Inclusive Legal Positivism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994
345. Wasserstrom, R. A. The Judicial Decision: Toward a Theory of Legal Justification. London: Oxford University Press, 1961
346. Weber, M. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Trans. T. Parsons. London: Routledge, 1992.
347. Weiler, P. In the Last Resort: A Critical Study of the Supreme Court of Canada. Toronto: Carswell, 1974
348. Weiler, P. Two Models of Judicial Decision-Making. (1968) 46 Can. Bar Rev. 407
349. Weiler, P.C. The Supreme Court of Canada and Canadian Federalism. (1973) 11 O.H.L.J. 225
350. Weinrib, E.J. The Idea of Private Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995
351. Wenner, A.M., & Johnson, D.L. Reply to Karl von Frisch. (1967) 158 Science 1076
352. Wenner, A.M., Wells, P.H., & Johnson, D.L. Honey Bee Recruitment to Food Sources: Olfaction or Language? (1969) 158 Science 84
353. Wilson, B. Decision-Making in the Supreme Court. (1986) U.T.L.J. 227
354. Wilson, B. Will Women Judges Really Make a Difference? (1990) 28 O.H.L.J. 507
355. Woodward, B., & Armstrong, S. The Brethern: Inside the Supreme Court. New York: Avon Books, 1981
356. Wrightsman, L.S. Judicial Decision Making: Is Psychology Relevant? New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 1999
357. Yablon, C. Are Judges Liars? A Wittgensteinian Critique of 'Law's Empire.' (1990) 3 C.J.L.J. 123