What national testing data can tell us

National Testing in Schools: An Australian Assessment

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 18-29

  Wu, Margaret ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84960499180     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315659312     Document Type: Chapter

References (14)

1. ACARA. (2013). NAPLAN achievement in reading, persuasive writing, language conventions and numeracy: National report for 2013. Sydney, Australia: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority.
2. Baker, F (2001). The basics of item response theory. College Park, MD: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation, University of Maryland. Retrieved October 2, 2014, from http://edres.org/irt/baker
3. Barnes, G. (2011). Report on the generation of the 2010 Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage (ICSEA). Retrieved January 4, 2015, from www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/ICSEA_Generation_Report.pdf
4. Byrne, B., Coventry, W. L., Olson, R. K., Wadsworth, S., Samuelsson, S., Petrill, S., Willcutt, E., & Corley, R. (2010). Teacher effects in early literacy development: Evidence from a study of twins. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 32-42. DOI: 10.1037/a0017288.
5. Darling-Hammond, L., Amrein-Beardsley, A., Haertel, E., & Rothstein, J. (2012). Evaluating teacher evaluation. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(6), 8-15. DOI: 10.1177/003172171209300603.
6. Haertel, E. H. (2013). Reliability and validity of inferences about teachers based on student test scores. William H. Angoff memorial lecture series, Educational Testing Service. Retrieved October 2, 2014, from https://www.ets.org/s/pdf/23497_Angoff%20Report-web.pdf
7. Harvill, L. M. (1991). Standard error of measurement: An NCME instructional module ITEMS: Instructional Topics in Educational Measurement, 10(2), 33-41.
8. Hattie, J.A.C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, UK: Routledge.
9. Marks, G. N. (2014). Demographic and socioeconomic inequalities in student achievement over the school career. Australian Journal of Education, 58(3), 223-247. DOI: 10.1177/0004944114537052.
10. Miller, P W, & Voon, D. (2012). Government versus non-government schools: A nationwide assessment using Australian NAPLAN data. Australian Economic Papers, September, 147-166. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8454.2012.00429.x/pdf.
11. Russell, M. (2000). Using expected growth size estimates to summarise test score changes. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(6).
12. Schochet, P, & Chiang, H. (2010). Error rates in measuring teacher and school performance based on student test score gains (NCEE 2010-4004). Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
13. Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L. (1997). A response model for multiple-choice items. In van der Linden, W.J., & Hambleton, R.K. (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (51-65). New York: Springer-Verlag.
14. Wu, M. L., & Les, M. (2008). The difference between boys and girls. EQ (Summer), 35-36.