A novel metabolomic approach used for the comparison of Staphylococcus aureus planktonic cells and biofilm samples

Metabolomics

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2016, Pages

  Stipetic, Laurence H ^a   Dalby, Matthew J ^b   Davies, Robert L ^a   Morton, Fraser R ^a   Ramage, Gordon ^c   Burgess, Karl E V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^c GLASGOW DENTAL HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biofilms; Metabolite extraction; Metabolomics; S. aureus

Indexed keywords

ARGININE;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIUM CULTURE; BEAD BEATING METHOD; BIOFILM; BIOINFORMATICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; HUMAN; HYDROPHILIC INTERACTION CHROMATOGRAPHY; LABORATORY TEST; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METABOLITE; METABOLOMICS; METHODOLOGY; PLANKTON; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; SAMPLING; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

EID: 84960428351     PISSN: 15733882     EISSN: 15733890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11306-016-1002-0     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. A, J. et al., 2005. Extraction and GC/MS analysis of the human blood plasma metabolome. Analytical Chemistry, 77(24), 8086–8094. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16351159.
2. Ammons, M. C. B., et al. (2014). Quantitative NMR metabolite profiling of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus discriminates between biofilm and planktonic phenotypes. Journal of Proteome Research,13, 2973–2985.
3. Arias, C. A., & Murray, B. E. (2015). A new antibiotic and the evolution of resistance. New England Journal of Medicine,372(12), 1168–1170. doi:10.1056/NEJMcibr1500292.
4. Bawn, C. E. H., & Wajid, M. A. (1956). High polymer solutions. Part 7- Vapour pressure of polystyrene solutions in acetone, chloroform and propyl acetate. Transactions of the Faraday Society,52, 1658–1664.
5. Beenken, K.E. et al., 2004. Global gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Journal of bacteriology, 186(14), 4665–4684. Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=438561&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
6. Bolano, A. et al., 2001. Rapid methods to extract DNA and RNA from Cryptococcus neoformans. FEMS Yeast Research, 1(3), 221–4. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12702347.
7. Bolstad, B.M. et al., 2003. A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 19(2), 185–193.
8. Bolten, C.J. et al., 2007. Sampling for metabolome analysis of microorganisms. Analytical Chemistry, 79(10), 3843–3849. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17411014.
9. Cassou, C. A., et al. (2014). Electrothermal supercharging in mass spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometry of native proteins. Analytical Chemistry,85(1), 138–146.
10. Christensen, G., et al. (1985). Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: A staphylococci to medical devices. Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: A quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci. Journal of Clinical Microbiology,22(6), 996–1006.
11. Creek, D.J. et al., 2012. IDEOM: An Excel interface for analysis of LC-MS-based metabolomics data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 28(7), 1048–1049.
12. Creek, D. J., et al. (2011). Identification by retention time prediction. Bioinformatics Application Note,28(7), 8703–8710.
13. de Koning, W. & van Dam, K., 1992. A method for the determination of changes of glycolytic metabolites in yeast on a subsecond time scale using extraction at neutral pH. Analytical biochemistry, 204(1), 118–123. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1514678.
14. Drenkard, E. & Ausubel, F.M., 2002. Pseudomonas biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance are linked to phenotypic variation. Nature, 416(6882), 740–743. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11961556.
15. Erlandsen, S.L. et al., 2004. High-resolution visualization of the microbial glycocalyx with low-voltage scanning electron microscopy: dependence on cationic dyes. The Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry: Official Journal of the Histochemistry Society, 52(11), 1427–1435. Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3957825&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed September 25, 2014.
16. Faijes, M., Mars, A.E. & Smid, E.J., 2007. Comparison of quenching and extraction methodologies for metabolome analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum. Microbial cell factories, 6, 27. Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2031893&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed September 12, 2014.
17. Fiehn, O., 2002. Metabolomics–the link between genotypes and phenotypes. Plant Molecular Biology, 48(1–2), 155–171. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11860207.
18. Gjersing, E.L. et al., 2007. NMR metabolomics of planktonic and biofilm modes of growth in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Analytical chemistry, 79(21), 8037–8045. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17915964.
19. Gross, J.H., 2011. Mass spectrometry a textbook (2nd Edn). In J. H. Gross (Ed.), Analytical Chemistry. Springer
20. Hedges, J. B., et al. (2013). Effects of ammonium bicarbonate on the electrospray mass spectra of proteins: evidence for bubble-induced unfolding. Analytical Chemistry,85, 6469–6476.
21. Hochberg, Y. & Benjamini, Y., 1990. More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing. Statistics in medicine, 9(7), 811–818. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2218183.
22. Horning, E.C. & Horning, M.G., 1971. Metabolic profiles: gas-phase methods for analysis of metabolites. Clinical chemistry, 17(8), 802–829. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5105517.
23. Jansen, B. & Kohnen, W., 1995. Prevention of biofilm formation by polymer modification. Journal of industrial microbiology, 15(4), 391–396. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8605077.
24. Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S., 2000. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic acids research, 28(1), 27–30. Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=102409&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
25. Laidler, K., 1984. The development of the Arrhenius equation. Journal of Chemical Education, 61(6), 494. Available at: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ed061p494. Accessed July 31, 2014.
26. Liebeke, M. et al., 2012. Metabolome analysis of gram-positive bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus by GC-MS and LC-MS. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) (Vol. 815, pp. 377–398).
27. Lopez-Ribot, J. L., 2014. Large-scale biochemical profiling of the candida albicans biofilm matrix: New compositional, structural, and functional insights. mBio, 5(5).
28. Maharjan, R.P. & Ferenci, T., 2003. Global metabolite analysis: The influence of extraction methodology on metabolome profiles of Escherichia coli. Analytical biochemistry, 313(1), 145–154. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12576070.
29. Merritt, J., Kadouri, D. & O’toole, G., 2005. Growing and analyzing static biofilms. Current protocols in …, Chapter 1(Unit 1B.1). Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780471729259.mc01b01s22/full. Accessed July 31, 2014.
30. Nicholson, J. K., & Lindon, J. C. (2008). Systems biology: Metabonomics. Nature, News and Views Q&A,455, 1054–1056.
31. O’Toole, G.A., 2011. Microtiter Dish Biofilm Formation Assay. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE, (47), 2437. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3182663/.
32. O’Toole, G., Kaplan, H. B., & Kolter, R. (2000). Biofilm formation as microbial development. Annual Review of Microbiology,54, 49–79.
33. Oliver, S.G. et al., 1998. Systematic functional analysis of the yeast genome. Trends in biotechnology, 16(9), 373–378. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9744112.
34. Passerini de Rossi, B. et al. 2007. Biofilm formation by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates from device-associated nosocomial infections. Revista Argentina de microbiología, 39(4), 204–212. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18390153.
35. Periasamy, S. et al., 2012. How Staphylococcus aureus biofilms develop their characteristic structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(4), 1281–1286. Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3268330&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed September 26, 2014.
36. Pierce, C.G. et al., 2008. A simple and reproducible 96-well plate-based method for the formation of fungal biofilms and its application to antifungal susceptibility testing. Nature Protocols, 3(9), 1494–1500. Available at: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nprot.2008.141. Accessed September 13, 2014.
37. Ramage, G. et al. 2003. Formation of Propionibacterium acnes biofilms on orthopaedic biomaterials and their susceptibility to antimicrobials. Biomaterials, 24(19), 3221–3227. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S014296120300173X. Accessed July 31, 2014.
38. Resch, A. et al. 2006. Comparative proteome analysis of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm and planktonic cells and correlation with transcriptome profiling. Proteomics, 6(6), 1867–1877. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16470655. Accessed May 22, 2014.
39. Resch, A., et al. (2005). Differential gene expression profiling of Staphylococcus aureus cultivated under biofilm and planktonic conditions differential gene expression profiling of staphylococcus aureus cultivated under biofilm and planktonic conditions. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,71(5), 2663–2676.
40. Salazar, O. & Asenjo, J. A, 2007. Enzymatic lysis of microbial cells. Biotechnology Letters, 29(7), 985–994. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17464453. Accessed July 10, 2014.
41. Scheltema, R. A et al. 2011. PeakML/mzMatch: a file format, Java library, R library, and tool-chain for mass spectrometry data analysis. Analytical chemistry, 83(7), 2786–2793. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21401061.
42. Scientific Industries, Inc, 2014. Cell Disruptor. Cell Disrupter Disrupter Genie Literature. Available at: http://www.scientificindustries.com/pdf/disruptorgenie-literature.pdf. Accessed September 18, 2014.
43. Smith, C. A et al., 2006. XCMS: Processing mass spectrometry data for metabolite profiling using nonlinear peak alignment, matching, and identification. Analytical chemistry, 78(3), 779–787. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16448051.
44. Smith, K. et al., 2008. Biofilm formation by Scottish clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of medical microbiology, 57(8), 1018–23. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18628505. Accessed July 17, 2014.
45. Smyth, G.K., 2004. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology, 3(1), p.Article3. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16646809. Accessed July 9, 2014.
46. Soga, T., et al. (2002). Simultaneous determination of anionic intermediates for Bacillus subtilis metabolic pathways by capillary electrophoresis electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry,74(10), 2233–2239. doi:10.1021/ac020064n.
47. Soga, T., et al. (2003). Quantitative metabolome analysis using capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry. Journal of Proteome Research,2(5), 488–494. doi:10.1021/pr034020m.
48. Srinivasan, A. et al., 2013. High-throughput nano-biofilm microarray for antifungal drug discovery. mBio, 4(4). Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3697808&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
49. Stipetic, L. H., et al. (2015). Draft genome sequence of isolate Staphylococcus aureus LHSKB clinical, isolated from an infected hip. Genome announcements,3(2), e00336.
50. Sumner, L., et al. (2014). Proposed quantitative and alphanumeric metabolite identification metrics. Metabolomics,10(6), 1047–1049. doi:10.1007/s11306-014-0739-6.
51. t’Kindt, R. et al., 2010. Towards an unbiased metabolic profiling of protozoan parasites: Optimisation of a Leishmania sampling protocol for HILIC-orbitrap analysis. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 398(5), 2059–2069. Available at: 10.1007/s00216-010-4139-0.
52. Takahashi, N., Washio, J. & Mayanagi, G., 2010. Metabolomics of supragingival plaque and oral bacteria. Journal of Dental Research, 89(12), 1383–1388. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20924070. Accessed July 19, 2014.
53. Tang, J., 2011. Microbial metabolomics. Current genomics, 12(6), 391–403. Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3178908&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
54. van Burik, J.-A. H., et al. (1998). Comparison of six extraction techniques for isolation of DNA from filamentous fungi. Medical Mycology,36(5), 299–303.
55. Weaver, W. M. et al., 2012. Fluid flow induces biofilm formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis polysaccharide intracellular adhesin-positive clinical isolates. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,78(16), 5890–5896. Available at: http://aem.asm.org/content/78/16/5890.abstract.
56. Wu, X.-H., et al. (2010). Sampling methods for NMR-based metabolomics of Staphylococcus aureus. Biotechnology Journal,5(1), 75–84. doi:10.1002/biot.200900038.
57. Yarwood, J. M., et al. (2004). Quorum sensing in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Journal of Bacteriology,186(6), 1838–1850.
58. Zhang, B., & Powers, R. (2012). Analysis of bacterial biofilms using NMR-based metabolomics. Future Medicinal Chemistry,4(10), 1273–1306.
59. Zhu, Y. et al., 2007. Staphylococcus aureus biofilm metabolism and the influence of arginine on polysaccharide intercellular adhesin synthesis, biofilm formation, and pathogenesis. Infection and Immunity, 75(9), 4219–26. Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1951195&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed May 13, 2014.