Clinical performance of a new blood control peripheral intravenous catheter: A prospective, randomized, controlled study

International Emergency Nursing

Volumn 25, Issue , 2016, Pages 59-64

  Seiberlich, Laura E ^a   Keay, Vanessa ^b   Kallos, Stephane ^c   Junghans, Tiffany ^c   Lang, Eddy ^c   McRae, Andrew D ^c  

^a ASD INC   (United States)

^b FOOTHILLS HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Blood control; Blood exposure; Closed system; Emergency nursing; Mucocutaneous exposure; Needlestick injury reduction; Peripheral intravenous catheters; Safety valved catheter

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CATHETERIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE TRANSMISSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDWELLING CATHETER; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARDS; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; CATHETERS, INDWELLING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFECTIOUS DISEASE TRANSMISSION, PATIENT-TO-PROFESSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84960404274     PISSN: 1755599X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2015.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Blackwelder W.C. Proving the null hypothesis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1982, 3:345-353.
2. Deguzman Z.C., O'Mara S.K., Sulo S., Haines T., Blackburn L., Corazza J. Bacteriostatic normal saline compared with buffered 1% lidocaine when injected intradermally as a local anesthetic to reduce pain during intravenous catheter insertion. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing 2012, 27(6):399-407.
3. Elmiyeh B., Whitaker I.S., James M.J., Chahal C.A., Galea A., Alshafi K. Needle-stick injuries in the National Health Service: a culture of silence. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2004, 97:326-327.
4. LaRue G.D. Efficacy of ultrasonography in peripheral venous cannulation. Journal of Infusion Nursing 2000, 23:29-34.
5. Maki D.G. Improving the safety of peripheral intravenous catheters. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2008, 337:122-123.
6. Maki D.G., Kluger D.M., Crnich C.J. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Mayo Clinic 2006, 81:1159-1171.
7. Mallin A.R., Sinclair D. Needlestick injuries and potential body fluid exposure in the emergency department. Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine 2003, 5(1):36-37.
8. McNaughton C., Zhou C., Robert L., Storrow A., Kennedy R. A randomized, crossover comparison of injected buffered lidocaine, lidocaine cream, and no analgesia for peripheral intravenous cannula insertion. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2009, 54(2):214-220.
9. Onia R., Eshun-Wilson I., Arce C., Ellis C., Parvu V., Hassman D., et al. Evaluation of a new safety peripheral IV catheter designed to reduce mucocutaneous blood exposure. Current Medical Research and Opinion 2011, 27(7):1339-1346.
10. Porta C., Handelman E., McGovern P. Needlestick injuries among health care workers. A literature review. AAOHN Journal: Official Journal of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses 1999, 47(6):237-244.
11. Prunet B., Meaudre E., Montcriol A., Asencio Y., Bordes J., Lacroix G., et al. A prospective randomized trial of two safety peripheral intravenous catheters. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2008, 107(1):155-158.
12. Roff M., Basu S., Adisesh A. Do active safety-needle devices cause spatter contamination?. The Journal of Hospital Infection 2014, 86(3):221-223.
13. Saia M., Hofmann F., Sharman J., Abiteboul D., Campins M., Burkowitz J., et al. Needlestick injuries: incidence and cost in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy and Spain. Biomedical International 2010, 1:41-49.
14. Sharma R., Rasania S.K., Verma A., Singh S. Study of prevalence and response to needle stick injuries among health care workers in a tertiary care hospital in Delhi, India. Indian Journal of Community Medicine: Official Publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine 2010, 35(1):74-77.
15. Tamura N., Abe S., Hagimoto K., Kondo A., Matsuo A., Ozawa Y., et al. Unfavorable peripheral intravenous catheter replacements can be reduced using an integrated closed intravenous catheter system. The Journal of Vascular Access 2014, 15(4):257-263.
16. Winfield C., Knicely C., Jensen C., Taylor S., Thomas K., Conaway M., et al. What is the least painful method of anesthetizing a peripheral IV site?. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing 2013, 28(4):217-222.
17. Wittmann A., Köver J., Kralj N., Gasthaus K., Tosch M., Hofmann F. Mucocutaneous blood contact: blood release behavior of safety peripheral intravenous catheters. American Journal of Infection Control 2013, 41:1214-1217.
18. Yang L., Mullan B. Reducing needle stick injuries in healthcare occupations: an integrative review of the literature 2011, ISRN Nursing.