Adapting the IDEAL Framework and Recommendations for medical device evaluation: A modified Delphi survey

International Journal of Surgery

Volumn 28, Issue , 2016, Pages 141-148

  Pennell, Christopher P ^a   Hirst, Allison ^b   Sedrakyan, Art ^c   McCulloch, Peter G ^b  

^a MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Delphi survey; IDEAL Framework; IDEAL Recommendations; Medical device; Medical device safety

Indexed keywords

CONSENSUS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DELPHI STUDY; EVALUATION STUDY; MEDICAL DEVICE; MEDICAL DEVICE REGULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTER; REVIEW; ADVERSE EFFECTS; DEVICES; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; QUESTIONNAIRE;

DELPHI TECHNIQUE; EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84960332069     PISSN: 17439191     EISSN: 17439159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.082     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Cohen D. Out of joint: the story of the ASR. BMJ 2011, 342:d2905.
2. Heneghan C. The saga of poly implant prosthese breast implants. BMJ 2012, 344:e306.
3. Zuckerman D.M., Brown P., Nissen S.E. Medical device recalls and the FDA approval process. Arch. Intern. Med. 2011, 171(11):1006-1011.
4. Cohen D., Billingsley M. Europeans are left to their own devices. BMJ 2011, 342:d2748.
5. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health. CDRH Transparency - Total Product Life Cycle (TPLC). Available from: . (accessed 09.11.15). http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofMedicalProductsandTobacco/CDRH/CDRHTransparency/ucm199906.htm.
6. McCulloch P., Altman D.G., Campbell W.B., et al. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 2009, 374(9695):1105-1112.
7. Powell C. The Delphi technique: myths and realities. J. Adv. Nurs. 2003, 41:376-382.
8. Public Health Effectiveness of the FDA 510 (k) Clearance Process: Measuring Postmarket Performance and Other Select Topics: Workshop Report 2011, National Academies Press. T. Wizemann (Ed.).
9. Relton C., Torgerson D., O'Cathain A., et al. Rethinking pragmatic randomized controlled trials: introducing the "cohort multiple randomised controlled trial" design. BMJ 2010, 340:c1066.