The explicit mentioning of reporting guidelines in urogynecology journals in 2013: A bibliometric study

Neurourology and Urodynamics

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 412-416

  Koch, Marianne ^a,b   Riss, Paul ^a,b   Umek, Wolfgang ^a,b   Hanzal, Engelbert ^a  

^a UNIV KLIN FÜR FRAUENHEILKUNDE   (Austria)

^b Karl Landsteiner Institute for Gynecologic Surgery and Oncology   (Austria)

Author keywords

CONSORT; PRISMA; reporting guidelines; research design; STROBE; urogynecology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIBLIOMETRICS; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COHORT ANALYSIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; GYNECOLOGY; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UROLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

BIBLIOMETRICS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; GYNECOLOGY; HUMANS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; UROLOGY;

EID: 84960325439     PISSN: 07332467     EISSN: 15206777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nau.22726     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. WMA Declaration of Helsinki [cited 2014]. Available from: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/
2. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D,. Group C. CONSORT statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Med 2010; 7: e1000251.
3. Simera I, Moher D, Hirst A, et al., Transparent accurate reporting increases reliability utility impact of your research: Reporting guidelines the EQUATOR Network. BMC Med 2010; 8: 24.
4. Simera I, Moher D, Hoey J, et al., The EQUATOR Network and reporting guidelines: Helping to achieve high standards in reporting health research studies. Maturitas 2009; 1: 4-6.
5. Moher D, Simera I, Schulz KF, et al., Helping editors peer reviewers, authors improve the clarity, completeness, transparency of reporting health research. BMC Med 2008; 6: 13.
6. Altman DG, Simera I,. Responsible reporting of health research studies: Transparent complete accurate timely. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010; 65: 1-3.
7. Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG, et al., Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review. Systematic reviews 2012; 1: 60.
8. Cobo E, Cortes J, Ribera JM, et al., Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: Masked randomised trial. Bmj. 2011; 343: d6783.
9. EQUATOR Network [cited 2014]. Available from: http://www.equator-network.org
10. Serrano M, Gonzalvo MC, Sanchez-Pozo MC, et al., Adherence to reporting guidelines in observational studies concerning exposure to persistent organic pollutants and effects on semen parameters. Human reproduction 2014; 29: 1122-33.
11. Vasilevsky NA, Brush MH, Paddock H, et al., On the reproducibility of science: Unique identification of research resources in the biomedical literature. PeerJ. 2013; 1: e148.
12. Florez-Vargas O, Bramhall M, Noyes H, et al., The quality of methods reporting in parasitology experiments. PloS ONE 2014; 9: e101131
13. Cui Q, Tian J, Song X, Yang K,. Does the CONSORT checklist for abstracts improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials on clinical pathways ? J Eval Clin Pract 2014; (Epub ahead of print) PubMed PMID: 24916891.
14. Walther S, Schueler S, Tackmann R, et al., Compliance with STARD checklist among studies of coronary CT angiography: Systematic review. Radiology 2014; 271: 74-86.
15. Peron J, Maillet D, Gan HK, et al., Adherence to CONSORT adverse event reporting guidelines in randomized clinical trials evaluating systemic cancer therapy: A systematic review. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 3957-63.
16. Blakely ML, Kao LS, Tsao K, et al., Adherence of randomized trials within children's surgical specialties published during 2000 to 2009 to standard reporting guidelines. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 217: 394-9 e7.
17. Cavadas V, Branco F, Carvalho FL, et al., The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2011; 22: 1117-25.
18. Dwyer PL, Riss P, Haylen BT,. Does it matter what we measure? Core outcomes, the IUJ and the CROWN and COMET initiatives. Int Urogynecol J 2014; 25: 1301-2.