Drawing fine lines behind bars: Pushing the boundaries of researcher neutrality in unconventional contexts

Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research: Innovative Pathways and Methods

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 66-75

  Rogers, Kristie M ^a   Toubiana, Madeline ^b   DeCelles, Katherine A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b University of Toronto ^*

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84960309933     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315849072     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Bamberger, P. A., & Pratt, M. G. (2010). Moving forward by looking back: Reclaiming unconventional research contexts and samples in organizational scholarship. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 665–671.
2. Cappelli, P., & Sherer, P. D. (1991). The missing role of context in OB: The need for a meso-level approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 55–110.
3. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
4. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
5. Creed, W. E. D., DeJordy, R., & Lok, J. (2010). Being the change: Resolving institutional contradiction through identity work. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1336–1364.
6. Drew, S. K., & Mills, M. (2007). Ethnography as dirty work. In S. K. Drew, M. B. Mills, & B. M. Gassaway (Eds.), Dirty work (pp. 217–231). Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.
7. Drew, S. K., Mills, M. B., & Gassaway, B. M. (2007). Dirty work. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.
8. Ebaugh, H. R. F. (1977). Out of the cloister: A study of organizational dilemmas. Austin: University of Texas Press.
9. Ebaugh, H. R. F. (1988). Becoming an ex: The process of role exit. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10. Elsbach, K., & Bechky, B. A. (2009). Introduction: Research context and attention of the qualitative researcher. In K. D. Elsbach & B A. Bechky (Eds.), Qualitative organizational research: Best papers from the Davis Conference on Qualitative Research (Vol. 2). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
11. Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
12. Jewkes, Y. (2014). An introduction to “Doing Prison Research Differently.” Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 387–391.
13. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15. Lutgen-Sandvik, P. (2008). Intensive remedial identity work: Responses to workplace bullying trauma and stigmatization. Organization, 15, 97–119.
16. McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Morgan, G. (Ed.). (1983). Beyond method: Strategies for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Pratt, M. G. (2008). Fitting oval pegs into round holes: Tensions in evaluating and publishing qualitative research in top-tier North American journals. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 481–509.
20. Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21. Singleton, R. A., Jr., & Straits, B. C. (2005). Approaches to social research (4th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22. Van Maanen, J. (1978). The asshole. In P. K. Manning & J. Van Maanen (Eds.), Policing: A view from the street (pp. 231–238). Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.
23. Zilber, T. B. (2002). Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: The case of a rape crisis center in Israel. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 234–254.