Landscape strategy making and landscape characterisation—experiences from Danish experimental planning processes

Landscape Research

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 227-238

  Primdahl, Jørgen ^a   Kristensen, Lone S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

common goods; landscape democracy; Landscape strategy making; place making

Indexed keywords

LAND RIGHTS; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PLANNING PROCESS; RURAL LANDSCAPE; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

DENMARK;

EID: 84960298510     PISSN: 01426397     EISSN: 14699710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2015.1135322     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. H.T.Andersen,, L.Møller-Jensen,, & S.Engelstoft, (2011). The end of urbanization? Towards a new urban concept or rethinking urbanization. European Planning Studies, 19, 595–611.10.1080/09654313.2011.548472
2. F.Arler, (2008). A true landscape democracy. In S.Arntzen & E.Brady (Eds.), Humans in the land. The ethics and aesthetics of the cultural landscape (pp. 75–99). Oslo: Unipub.
3. T.Bloemers,, S.Daniels,, G.Fairclough,, B.Pedroli,, & R.Stiles, (2010). Landscape in a changing world. Science Policy Briefing, Oct., Eurpean Science Foundation: Bridging Divides, Integrating Disciplines, Serving Society.
4. J.Carolino,, J.Primdahl,, T.Pinto-Correia,, & M.Bojesen, (2011). Hunting and the rigth to landscape: Comparing the Portuguese and Danish traditions and current challenges. In S.Egoz, J.Makhzoumi, & G.Pungetti (Eds.), The right to landscape. Contesting landscape and human rights (pp. 98–112). Aldershot: Ashgate.
5. O.H.Caspersen, (2009). Public participation in strengthening cultural heritage: The role of landscape character assessment in Denmark. Danish Journal of Geography, 109, 33–45.10.1080/00167223.2009.10649594
6. Council of Europe. (2000). European landscape convention and explanatory report. Strasbourg: The General Directorate of Education, Culture, Sport and Youth, and Environment.
7. Countryside Commission and English Nature (1996). The character of England: Landscape, wildlife and natural features. CCX 41. Cheltenham: Countryside Commission/English Nature.
8. G.Ó.Cuinn, (2011). Land and space in the Golan Heights: A human rights perspective. In S.Egoz, J.Makhzoumi, & G.Pungetti (Eds.), The right to landscape. Contesting landscape and human rights (pp. 85–97). Aldershot: Ashgate.
9. EEA (2006). Urban sprawl in Europe. The ignored challenge. Characteristics, trends and policy challenges. EEA Report 10/2006. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
10. S.Egoz, (2011). Claiming a right to landscape: Rooting, the uprooting and re-rooting. In S.Egoz, J.Makhzoumi, & G.Pungetti (Eds.), The right to landscape. Contesting landscape and human rights (pp. 165–183). Aldershot: Ashgate.
11. A.Faludi,, & A.Van Der Valk, (1994). Rule and order. Dutch planning doctrine in the twentieth century. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-94-017-2927-7
12. A.W.Gilg, (1996). Countryside planning: The first half century. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203411742
13. P.Hall,, & M.Tewdwr-Jones, (2011). Urban and regional planning (5th ed.). London: Routledge.
14. P.Healey, (1988). The british planning system and managing the urban environment.Town Planning Review, 59, 397–415.10.3828/tpr.59.4.w72mv157710x4212
15. P.Healey, (2004). The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28, 45–67.10.1111/ijur.2004.28.issue-1
16. P.Healey, (2007). The project of strategic spatial planning for urban areas. In P.Healey (Ed.), Urban complexity and spatial strategies. Towards a relational planning for our times (pp. 1–12). London: Routledge.
17. P.Healey, (2009). In search of the ‘strategic’ in spatial strategy making. Planning Theory & Practice, 10, 439–457.
18. P.Healey, (2010). Making better places. The planning project in the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
19. I.S.Herlin, (2004). New challenges in the field of spatial planning: Landscapes. Landscape Research, 29, 399–411.10.1080/0142639042000289037
20. I.Hodge, (2001). Beyond agri-environmental policy: Towards an alternative model of rural environmental governace. Land Use Policy, 18, 99–111.10.1016/S0264-8377(01)00002-3
21. I.Hodge, (2007). The governance of rural land in a liberalised world. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58, 409–432.10.1111/jage.2007.58.issue-3
22. L.H.Jensen, (2006). Changing conceptualization of landscape in English landscape assessment methods. In B.Tress, G.Tress, G.Fry, & P.Opdam (Eds.), From landscape research to landscape planning (pp. 161–171). Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-5363-4
23. M.Jones, (2007). The European landscape convention and the question of public participation. Landscape Research, 32, 613–633.10.1080/01426390701552753
24. K.Knickel,, H.Renting,, & J.D.van der Ploeg, (2004). Multifunctionality in European agriculture. In F.Brouwer (Ed.), Sustaining agriculture and the rural environment. Governace, policy and multifuntionality (pp. 81–103). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
25. L.S.Kristensen,, P.G.Møller,, & M.B.Rask, (2015). In L.S.Kristensen, J.Primdahl, & H.Vejre (Eds.), Dialogbaseret planlægning i det åbne land – om strategier for kulturlandskabets fremtid (pp. 86–105). Nykøbing Sj: Bogværket.
26. J.Martin Associates,., & C.Swanwick,. (2003). Overview of Scotland’s national programme of Landscape Character Assessment. Scottish Natural Heritage. Commissioned Report F03 AA307. Retrieved from: http://www.snh.org.uk
27. S.Mücher,, & D.Wascher, (2007). European landscape characterisation. In B.Pedroli, A.Van Doorn, G.De Blust, M.L.Paracchini, D.Wascher, & F.Bunce (Eds.), Europe’s living landscapes. Essays on exploring our identity in the countryside (pp. 37–43). Zeist: KNNV.
28. K.R.Olwig, (1996). Recovering the substantive nature of landscape. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 86, 630–653.10.1111/j.1467-8306.1996.tb01770.x
29. K.R.Olwig, (2002). Landscape, nature and the body politics: From Britain’s Renaissance to America’s New World. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
30. K.R.Olwig, (2005). The landscape of ‘customary’ law versus that of ‘natural’ law. Landscape Research, 30, 299–320.10.1080/01426390500165385
31. T.Pinto-Correia,, & B.Breman, (2009). New roles for farming in a differentiated countryside: The Portuguese example. Regional Environmental Change, 9, 143–152.10.1007/s10113-008-0062-8
32. J.Primdahl, (2014). Agricultural landscape sustainability under presure: Policy developments and landscape change. Landscape Research, 39, 123–140.10.1080/01426397.2014.891726
33. J.Primdahl,, J.Handgaard,, L.S.Kristensen,, P.Stahlschmidt,, A.Rask,, & H.Willadsen, (2010). Det åbne land i kommuneplanprocessen. Byplan, 1, 32–39.
34. J.Primdahl,, L.K.Kristensen,, & S.Swaffield, (2013). Guiding landscape change. Current policy approaches and potentials of landscape strategy making as a policy integrating approach. Applied Geography, 42, 86–94.10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.04.004
35. J.Ravetz,, C.Fertner,, & T.S.Nielsen, (2013). The dynamics of peri-urbanization. In K.Nilsson, S.Pauleit, S.Bell, C.Aalbers, & T.S.Nielsen (Eds.), Peri-urban futures: Scenarios and models for land use change in Europe (pp. 13–44). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-30529-0
36. A.J.Scott,, C.Carter,, M.R.Reed,, P.Larkham,, D.Adams,, N.Morton,, … R.Coles, (2013). Disintegrated development at the rural–urban fringe: Re-connecting spatial planning theory and practice. Progress in Planning, 83, 1–52.10.1016/j.progress.2012.09.001
37. P.Selman, (2004). Community participation in the planning and management of cultural landscapes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47, 365–392.10.1080/0964056042000216519
38. P.Selman, (2009). Planning for landscape multifunctionality. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 5, 45–52.
39. Skive Kommune. (2009a). Landskabsanalyse for Skive Kommune 09 – en intro juli 2009. Retrieved from http://www.skive.dk/media/4703/landskabsanalyse2009.pdf
40. Skive Kommune. (2009b). Landskabsanalyse for skive kommune 09 – beskrivelser af landskabsegne og landskabsområder. Retrieved from http://www.skive.dk/media/4710/beskrivelser-til-nettet.pdf
41. P.Stahlschmidt,, & V.Nellemann, (2009). Metoder til landskabsanalyser. Kortlægning af stedets karakter og potentiale. København: Grønt Miljø.
42. M.Stenseke, (2009). Local participation in cultural landscape maintenance: Lessons from Sweden. Land Use Policy, 26, 214–223.
43. M.Stenseke,, & M.Jones, (2011). Conclusion: Benefits, difficulties, and challenges of participation under the European landscape convention. In M.Jones & M.Stenseke (Eds.), The European landscape convention (pp. 295–309). Landscape Series 13, Dortrecht: Springer.
44. C.Swanwick,. (2004). The assessment of countryside and landscape character in England: An overview. In K. Bishop & A. Phillips (Eds.), Countryside planning. New approaches to management and conservation (pp. 109–124). London: Earthscan.
45. A.Van der Valk, (2013). Preservation and development: The cultural landscape and heritage paradox in the Netherlands. Landscape Research, 39, 158–173.
46. H.Vejre,, J.Abildtrup,, N.Kærgaard,, Fritzbøger, A.G.Busck,, & S.B.Olsen, (2012). Revitalisation of common use in management of modern multifunctional landscapes. Landscape Research, 37, 637–657.10.1080/01426397.2012.705821
47. S.Warnock,, & G.Griffiths, (2015). Landscape characterisation: The living landscapes approach in the UK. Landscape Research, 40, 261–278. doi:10.1080/01426397.2013.870541
48. G.A.Wilson, (2008). From ‘weak’ to ‘strong’ multifunctionality: Conceptualising farm-level multifunctional transitional pathways. Journal of Rural Studies, 24, 367–383.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.12.010