Bi-level Programing Merger Evaluation and Application to Banking Operations

Production and Operations Management

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 498-515

  Wu, Desheng Dash ^a   Luo, Cuicui ^a   Wang, Haofei ^b   Birge, John R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b REYKJAVIK UNIVERSITY   (Iceland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

banking operations; bi level programing; DEA; incentive compatible; merger; multi methodological approach; risk; series chain

Indexed keywords

EID: 84960261708     PISSN: 10591478     EISSN: 19375956     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/poms.12205     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Akhavein, J. D., A. N. Berger, D. B. Humphrey,. 1997. The effects of megamergers on efficiency and prices: Evidence from a bank profit function. Rev. Ind. Organ. 12 (1): 95-139.
2. Aquino, K., A. Reed,. 1998. A social dilemma perspective on cooperative behavior in organizations: The effects of scarcity, communication, and unequal access on the use of a shared resource. Group Organ. Manag. 23 (4): 390-413.
3. Arbel, A., Y. E. Orger,. 1990. An application of AHP to bank strategic planning: The merger and acquisitions process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48 (1): 27-37.
4. Bagchi, P., R. P. Rao,. 1992. Decision making in mergers: An application of the analytic hierarchy process. Manage. Decis. Econ. 13 (2): 91-99.
5. Banker, R. D., A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper,. 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 30 (9): 1078-1092.
6. Bard J., 1998. Practical Bilevel Optimization: Algorithms and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.
7. Berger, A. N., D. B. Humphrey,. 1992. Megamergers in banking and the use of cost efficiency as an antitrust defense. Antitrust Bull. 37 (3): 541-600.
8. Berger, A. N., D. B. Humphrey,. 1997. Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 98 (2): 175-212.
9. Berger, A. N., D. Hancock, D. B. Humphrey,. 1993. Bank efficiency derived from the profit function. J. Bank. Finance 17 (2/3): 317-348.
10. Berger, A. N., R. S. Demsetz, P. E. Strahan,. 1999. The consolidation of the financial services industry: Causes, consequences, and implications for the future. J. Bank. Finance 23 (2): 135-194.
11. Bertrand, O., H. Zitouna,. 2008. Domestic versus cross border acquisitions: Which impact on the target firms' performance? Appl. Econ. 40 (17): 2221-2238.
12. Bogetoft, P., D. Wang,. 2005. Estimating the potential gains from mergers. J. Prod. Anal. 23 (2): 145-171.
13. Bonacich, P., 1987. Communication networks and collective action. Soc. Networks 9 (4): 389-396.
14. Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, E. Rhodes,. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 6 (2): 429-444.
15. Clark, J. A., 1996. Economic cost, scale efficiency, and competitive viability in banking. J. Money Credit Bank. 28 (3): 342-364.
16. Cooper, W. W., L. M. Seiford, K. Tone,. 2000. Data Envelopment Analysis. Kluwer, Boston, MA.
17. Cummins, J. D., X. Xie,. 2008. Mergers and acquisitions in the US property-liability insurance industry: Productivity and efficiency effects. J. Bank. Finance 2 (1): 30-55.
18. Daughety, A. F., 1990. Beneficial concentration. Am. Econ. Rev. 80 (5): 1231-1237.
19. Davidoff S. M., 2013. Deals now make sense, not just money. New York Times debate. Available at http://www.nytimes.com (accessed date March 11, 2013).
20. Deneckere, R., C. Davidson,. 1985. Incentives to form coalitions with bertrand competition. Rand J. Econ. 16 (4): 473-486.
21. Deyoung, R., 1997. A diagnostic test for the distribution-free efficiency estimator: An example using US commercial bank data. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 98 (2): 243-249.
22. Deyoung, R., 1998. Management quality and X-inefficiency in national banks. J. Financ. Serv. Res. 13 (1): 5-22.
23. Farrell, J., C. Shapiro,. 1990. Horizontal mergers: An equilibrium analysis. Am. Econ. Rev. 80 (1): 107-126.
24. Finkelstein, S., H. Jerayr,. 2002. Understanding acquisition performance: The role of transfer effects. Organ. Sci. 13 (1): 36-47.
25. Garden, K. A., D. E. Ralston,. 1999. The x-efficiency and allocative efficiency effects of credit union mergers. J. Int. Finan. Markets Inst. Money 9 (3): 285-301.
26. Golany, B., J. E. Storbeck,. 1999. A data envelopment analysis of the operation efficiency of bank branches. Interfaces 29 (3): 14-26.
27. Gordon, V. K., M. Peterson,. 2005. Bank mergers and components of risk: An evaluation. J. Econ. Finance 29 (1): 85-96.
28. Heywood, J. S., M. McGinty,. 2007. Mergers among leaders and mergers among followers. Econ. Bull. 12 (12): 1-7.
29. Horne, J. C., J. M. Wachowicz, S. N. Bhaduri,. 2009. Fundamentals of Financial Management. Pearson Education, Essex, England.
30. Huck, S., K. A. Konrad, W. Muller,. 2004. Profitable horizontal mergers without cost advantages: The role of internal organization, information and market structure. Economica 71 (284): 575-587.
31. Jemison, D. B., S. B. Sitkin,. 1986. Corporate acquisitions: A process perspective. Acad. Manage. Rev. 11 (1): 145-163.
32. Kaparakis, E. I., S. M. Miller, A. G. Noulas,. 1994. Short-run cost inefficiency of commercial banks: A flexible stochastic frontier approach. J. Money Credit Bank. 26 (4): 875-894.
33. Kochhar, R., 1996. Explaining firm capital structure: The role of agency theory vs. transaction cost economics. Strategic Manage. J. 17 (9): 713-728.
34. Kreipl, S., M. Pinedo,. 2004. Planning and scheduling in supply chain: An overview of issues in practice. Prod. Oper. Manag. 13 (1): 29-77.
35. Lubatkin, M., W. S. Schulze, A. Mainkar, R. W. Cotterill,. 2001. Ecological investigation of firm effects in horizontal mergers. Strategic Manage. J. 22 (4): 335-357.
36. MacDonald, E. H., 2001. GIS in banking: Evaluation of Canadian Bank mergers. Can. J. Reg. Sci. 24 (3): 419-442.
37. Maddigan, R., J. Zaima,. 1985. The profitability of vertical integration. Manage. Dec. Econ. 6 (3): 178-179.
38. Mannix, E. A., 1993. Organizations as resource dilemmas: The effects of power balance on coalition formation in small groups. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. Process. 55 (1): 1-22.
39. MEI Computer Technology Group Inc. 2011. 2011 Trade promotion management trends.
40. Miller J., 1993. Measuring and aligning information systems with the organizations. Inf. Manage. 25 (4): 217-228.
41. Paradi, J., S. Vela, H. Zhu,. 2010. Adjusting for cultural differences, a new DEA model applied to a merged bank. J. Prod. Anal. 33 (2): 109-123.
42. Perry, M., R. H. Porter,. 1985. Oligopoly and incentive for horizontal merger. Am. Econ. Rev. 75 (1): 219-227.
43. Ray, S. C., 2004. Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory and Techniques for Economics and Operations Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 189-208.
44. Rhoades S. A., 1998. The efficiency effects of bank mergers: An overview of case studies of nine mergers. J. Bank. Finance 22 (3): 273-291.
45. Richey R. G. Jr., T. S. Kiessling, M. Tokman, V. Dalela,. 2008. Market growth through mergers and acquisitions: The role of the relationship marketing manager in sustaining performance. Ind. Market. Manag. 37 (4): 394-406.
46. Rothschild R., J. S. Heywood, K. Monaco,. 2000. Spatial price discrimination and the merger paradox. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 30 (5): 491-506.
47. Salant, S. W., S. Switzer, R. J. Reynolds,. 1983. Losses from horizontal merger: The effects of an exogenous change in industry structure on cournot-nash equilibrium. Q. J. Econ. 98 (2): 185-199.
48. Sherman, H. D., T. J. Rupert,. 2006. Do bank mergers have hidden or foregone value? Realized and unrealized operating synergies in one bank merger. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 168 (1): 253-268.
49. Sniezek, J. A., D. R. May, J. E. Sawyer,. 1990. Social uncertainty and interdependence: A study of resource allocation decision in groups. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. Process. 46 (2): 155-180.
50. Soteriou, A., S. A. Zenios,. 1999. Operations, quality, and profitability in the provision of banking services. Manage. Sci. 45 (9): 1221-1238.
51. Tulkens, H., 1993. On FDH efficiency analysis: Some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts and urban transit. J. Prod. Anal. 4 (1/2): 183-210.
52. Wang, C. H., R. Gopal, S. Zionts,. 1997. Use of data envelopment analysis in assessing information technology impact on firm performance. Ann. Oper. Res. 73 (10): 191-213.
53. Wu, D. D., J. R. Birge,. 2012. Serial chain merger evaluation model and application to mortgage banking. Dec. Sci. 43 (1): 5-36.