Evolving green building: triple bottom line or regenerative design?

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 153, Issue , 2017, Pages 600-607

  Gou, Zhonghua ^a   Xie, Xiaohuan ^b  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b SHENZHEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Green building; LEED; Regenerative design; Sustainability; Triple bottom line

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; BENCHMARKING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; THERMAL ENGINEERING; THERMAL INSULATION;

BUILDING PERFORMANCE; BUILDING PRACTICES; BUILT ENVIRONMENT; ECOLOGICAL APPROACHES; GREEN BUILDINGS; REGENERATIVE DESIGNS; THERMAL DISSIPATION; TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE;

ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN;

EID: 84960156907     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.077     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Alwaer, H., Sibley, M., Lewis, J., Different stakeholder perceptions of sustainability assessment. Archit. Sci. Rev. 51 (2008), 48–59.
2. Alyami, S.H., Rezgui, Y., Sustainable building assessment tool development approach. Sustain. Cities Soc. 5 (2012), 52–62.
3. Alyami, S.H., Rezgui, Y., Kwan, A., Developing sustainable building assessment scheme for Saudi Arabia: Delphi consultation approach. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 27 (2013), 43–54.
4. ® handbook 2012. 2012, ARUP.
5. Becker, J., Making sustainable development evaluations work. Sustain. Dev. 12 (2004), 200–211.
6. Berardi, U., Clarifying the new interpretations of the concept of sustainable building. Sustain. Cities Soc. 8 (2013), 72–78.
7. Birkeland, J., Positive Development: from Vicious Circles to Virtuous Cycles through Built Environment Design. 2008, Routledge.
8. Burnett, J., City buildings—eco-labels and shades of green!. Landsc. Urban Plan. 83 (2007), 29–38.
9. Burnett, J., Chau, C.K., Lee, W.L., Green buildings: how Green the label?. HKIE Trans. 12 (2005), 1–8.
10. Burnett, J., Yik, F.W.H., Framework of building environmental assessment methods. HKIE Trans. 8 (2001), 1–7.
11. Chau, C.K., Lee, W.L., Yik, F.W.H., Burnett, J., Towards a successful voluntary building environmental assessment scheme. Constr. Manag. Econ. 18 (2000), 959–968.
12. Chew, M.Y.L., Das, S., Building grading systems: a review of the state-of-the-art. Archit. Sci. Rev. 51 (2008), 3–13.
13. Choguill, C.L., Developing sustainable neighbourhoods. Habitat Int. 32 (2008), 41–48.
14. Clegg, P., A practitioner's view of the ‘Regenerative Paradigm’. Build. Res. Inf. 40 (2012), 365–368.
15. Cole, R.J., Emerging trends in building environmental assessment methods. Build. Res. Inf. 26 (1998), 3–16.
16. Cole, R.J., Building environmental assessment methods: clarifying intentions. Build. Res. Inf. 27 (1999), 230–246.
17. Cole, R.J., Building environmental assessment methods: redefining intentions and roles. Build. Res. Inf. 33 (2005), 455–467.
18. Cole, R.J., Transitioning from green to regenerative design. Build. Res. Inf. 40 (2011), 39–53.
19. Cole, R.J., Busby, P., Guenther, R., Briney, L., Blaviesciunaite, A., Alencar, T., A regenerative design framework: setting new aspirations and initiating new discussions. Build. Res. Inf. 40 (2011), 95–111.
20. Cole, R.J., Oliver, A., Robinson, J., Regenerative design, socio-ecological systems and co-evolution. Build. Res. Inf. 41 (2013), 237–247.
21. Conte, E., Monno, V., Beyond the buildingcentric approach: a vision for an integrated evaluation of sustainable buildings. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 34 (2012), 31–40.
22. Cooper, I., Which focus for building assessment methods – environmental performance or sustainability?. Build. Res. Inf. 27 (1999), 321–331.
23. Cooper, I., Winning hearts and minds or evidence-driven: which trajectory for regenerative design?. Build. Res. Inf. 40 (2012), 357–360.
24. Dammann, S., Elle, M., Environmental indicators: establishing a common language for green building. Build. Res. Inf. 34 (2006), 387–404.
25. Ding, G.K.C., Sustainable construction—the role of environmental assessment tools. J. Environ. Manag. 86 (2008), 451–464.
26. du Plessis, C., Towards a regenerative paradigm for the built environment. Build. Res. Inf. 40 (2011), 7–22.
27. Espinoza, O., Buehlmann, U., Smith, B., Forest certification and green building standards: overview and use in the U.S. hardwood industry. J. Clean. Prod. 33 (2012), 30–41.
28. Geng, Y., Dong, H., Xue, B., Fu, J., An overview of Chinese green building standards. Sustain. Dev. 20 (2012), 211–221.
29. Gething, B., Bordass, B., Rapid assessment checklist for sustainable buildings. Build. Res. Inf. 34 (2006), 416–426.
30. Gou, Z., Lau, S.S.-Y., Contextualizing green building rating systems: case study of Hong Kong. Habitat Int. 44 (2014), 282–289.
31. Gou, Z., Lau, S.S.-Y., Prasad, D., Market readiness and policy implications for green buildings: case study from Hong Kong. Coll. Publ. 8 (2013), 162–173.
32. Gou, Z., Prasad, D., Siu-Yu Lau, S., Are green buildings more satisfactory and comfortable?. Habitat Int. 39 (2013), 156–161.
33. Haapio, A., Viitaniemi, P., A critical review of building environmental assessment tools. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 28 (2008), 469–482.
34. Hiete, M., Kühlen, A., Schultmann, F., Analysing the interdependencies between the criteria of sustainable building rating systems. Constr. Manag. Econ. 29 (2011), 323–328.
35. Horvat, M., Fazio, P., Comparative review of existing certification programs and performance assessment tools for residential buildings. Archit. Sci. Rev. 48 (2005), 69–80.
36. Hoxie, C., Berkebile, R., Todd, J.A., Stimulating regenerative development through community dialogue. Build. Res. Inf. 40 (2011), 65–80.
37. Kaatz, E., Root, D.S., Bowen, P.A., Hill, R.C., Advancing key outcomes of sustainability building assessment. Build. Res. Inf. 34 (2006), 308–320.
38. Kimata, N., Japanese expectations for green building assessments. Build. Res. Inf. 27 (1999), 294–299.
39. Kohler, N., The relevance of green building challenge: an observer's perspective. Build. Res. Inf. 27 (1999), 309–320.
40. Lee, W.L., Burnett, J., Customization of GBTool in Hong Kong. Build. Environ. 41 (2006), 1831–1846.
41. Liu, Y., Prasad, D., Li, J., Fu, Y., Liu, J., Developing regionally specific environmental building tools for China. Build. Res. Inf. 34 (2006), 372–386.
42. Lombardi, P., Brandon, P., The multimodal system approach to sustainability planning evaluation. Deakin, M., Mitchell, G., Nijkamp, P., Vreeker, R., (eds.) Sustainable Urban Development The Environmental Assessment Methods, vol. 2, 2007, Routledge, Oxon, 47–64.
43. Lützkendorf, T., Lorenz, D.P., Using an integrated performance approach in building assessment tools. Build. Res. Inf. 34 (2006), 334–356.
44. Lyle, J.T., Regenerative Design for Sustainable Development. 1994, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, N.Y.
45. Mang, P., Reed, B., Designing from place: a regenerative framework and methodology. Build. Res. Inf. 40 (2011), 23–38.
46. Mcdonough, W., Braungart, M., The Upcycle: beyond Sustainability for Abundance. 2013, North Point Press, New York.
47. Moe, K., Insulating Modernism: Isolated and Non-isolated Thermodynamics in Architecture. 2014, Birkhäuser.
48. Murakami, S., Kawakubo, S., Asami, Y., Ikaga, T., Yamaguchi, N., Kaburagi, S., Development of a comprehensive city assessment tool: CASBEE-city. Build. Res. Inf. 39 (2011), 195–210.
49. Newton, P.W., Regenerating cities: technological and design innovation for Australian suburbs. Build. Res. Inf. 41 (2013), 575–588.
50. Ng, S.T., Chen, Y., Wong, J.M.W., Variability of building environmental assessment tools on evaluating carbon emissions. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 38 (2013), 131–141.
51. Olgyay, V., Herdt, J., The application of ecosystems services criteria for green building assessment. Sol. Energy 77 (2004), 389–398.
52. Papamichael, K., Green building performance prediction/assessment. Build. Res. Inf. 28 (2000), 394–402.
53. Pedersen Zari, M., Ecosystem services analysis for the design of regenerative built environments. Build. Res. Inf. 40 (2011), 54–64.
54. Plaut, J.M., Dunbar, B., Wackerman, A., Hodgin, S., Regenerative design: the LENSES Framework for buildings and communities. Build. Res. Inf. 40 (2011), 112–122.
55. Reed, B., Shifting from ‘sustainability’ to regeneration. Build. Res. Inf. 35 (2007), 674–680.
56. Retzlaff, R.C., Green building assessment systems: a framework and comparison for planners. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 74 (2008), 505–519.
57. Robinson, J., Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecol. Econ. 48 (2004), 369–384.
58. Schweber, L., Haroglu, H., Comparing the fit between BREEAM assessment and design processes. Build. Res. Inf. 42 (2014), 300–317.
59. Scofield, J.H., Efficacy of LEED-certification in reducing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission for large New York city office buildings. Energy Build. 67 (2013), 517–524.
60. Sharifi, A., Murayama, A., A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 38 (2013), 73–87.
61. Svec, P., Berkebile, R., Todd, J.A., REGEN: toward a tool for regenerative thinking. Build. Res. Inf. 40 (2011), 81–94.
62. Tainter, J.A., Regenerative design in science and society. Build. Res. Inf. 40 (2012), 369–372.
63. Tam, C.M., Tam, V.W.Y., Zeng, S.X., Environmental performance assessment in China and Hong Kong. Build. Res. Inf. 32 (2004), 110–118.
64. Tam, V.W.Y., The effectiveness of the green building evaluation and labelling system. Archit. Sci. Rev. 50 (2007), 323–330.
65. Todd, J.A., Crawley, D., Geissler, S., Lindsey, G., Comparative assessment of environmental performance tools and the role of the green building challenge. Build. Res. Inf. 29 (2001), 324–335.
66. Todd, J.A., Geissler, S., Regional and cultural issues in environmental performance assessment for buildings. Build. Res. Inf. 27 (1999), 247–256.
67. ® for New Construction Buildings. 2008, U.S. Green Building Council.
68. USGBC, Green Building and LEED Core Concepts. 2009, U.S. Green Building Council.
69. USGBC, LEED V4 User Guide. 2013, U.S. Green Building Council, Washington, DC.
70. Wallhagen, M., Glaumann, M., Design consequences of differences in building assessment tools: a case study. Build. Res. Inf. 39 (2010), 16–33.
71. WB, T., Understanding the Green Building Toolkit: Picking the Right Tool for the Job. 2003, USGBC Greenbuilding International Conference & Expo, Pittsburgh, USA.
72. Weshah, N., Sadeghpour, F., Measuring the sustainability of existing communities using LEED for neighbourhood development (LEED-ND) rating system. ICSDC 2011 (2011), 611–619.
73. Williams, K., Regenerative design as a force for change: thoughtful, optimistic and evolving ideas. Build. Res. Inf. 40 (2012), 361–364.
74. Zhang, X., Platten, A., Shen, L., Green property development practice in China: costs and barriers. Build. Environ. 46 (2011), 2153–2160.
75. Zhang, X., Wu, Y., Shen, L., Skitmore, M., A prototype system dynamic model for assessing the sustainability of construction projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 32 (2014), 66–76.
76. Zuo, J., Zhao, Z.-Y., Green building research–current status and future agenda: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 30 (2014), 271–281.