An Education- and Telephone-Based Intervention to Improve Follow-up to Vision Care in Patients With Diabetes: A Prospective, Single-Blinded, Randomized Trial

American Journal of Medical Quality

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 156-161

  Zangalli, Camila S ^a   Murchison, Ann P ^a   Hale, Nicole ^a   Hark, Lisa A ^a   Pizzi, Laura T ^b   Dai, Yang ^c   Leiby, Benjamin E ^c   Haller, Julia A ^a  

^a WILLS EYE HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

diabetes care; diabetic retinopathy; eye care adherence; intervention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REMINDER SYSTEM; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SOCIOECONOMICS; TELEPHONE; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REMINDER SYSTEMS; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TELEPHONE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84960116935     PISSN: 10628606     EISSN: 1555824X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1062860614552670     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. J.H.KempenB.J.O’ColmainM.C.Leske. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:552-563.
2. S.VitaleM.F.CotchR.D.Sperduto. Prevalence of visual impairment in the United States. JAMA. 2006;295:2158-2163.
3. B.E.Klein. Overview of epidemiologic studies of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007;14:179-183.
4. R.N.Frank. Diabetic retinopathy. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:48-58.
5. Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy: clinical application of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS) findings, DRS Report Number 8. The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology. 1981;88:583-600.
6. Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 1. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103:1796-1806.
7. F.L.FerrisIII. How effective are treatments for diabetic retinopathy?JAMA. 1993;269:1290-1291.
8. S.VijanT.P.HoferR.A.Hayward. Cost-utility analysis of screening intervals for diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 2000;283:889-896.
9. J.C.JavittL.P.Aiello. Cost-effectiveness of detecting and treating diabetic retinopathy. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124(1, pt 2):164-169.
10. J.C.JavittL.P.AielloY.ChiangF.L.FerrisIIIJ.K.CannerS.Greenfield. Preventive eye care in people with diabetes is cost-saving to the federal government: implications for health-care reform. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:909-917.
11. F.A.SloanG.PiconeD.S.BrownP.P.Lee. Longitudinal analysis of the relationship between regular eye examinations and changes in visual and functional status. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:1867-1874.
12. J.C.Javitt. Universal coverage and preventable blindness. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:453.
13. ONE Network. Diabetic retinopathy summary benchmark:2013. http://one.aao.org/summary-benchmark-detail/diabetic-retinopathy-summary-benchmark–october-20. Accessed September 2, 2014.
14. American Diabetes Association. Diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(suppl 1):S73-S76.
15. X.ZhangJ.B.SaaddineP.P.Lee. Eye care in the United States: do we deliver to high-risk people who can benefit most from it?Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125:411-418.
16. R.J.BrooksA.P.LegorretaA.L.SilverR.J.FabiusJ.Krakovitz. Implementing guidelines for eye care of diabetic patients: results from an HMO intervention study. Am J Manag Care. 1996;2:365-369.
17. R.J.HalbertK.M.LeungJ.M.NicholA.P.Legorreta. Effect of multiple patient reminders in improving diabetic retinopathy screening: a randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:752-755.
18. A.P.LegorretaM.M.HasanA.L.PetersK.R.PelletierK.M.Leung. An intervention for enhancing compliance with screening recommendations for diabetic retinopathy: a bicoastal experience. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:520-523.
19. D.L.RoterJ.A.HallR.MeriscaB.NordstromD.CretinB.Svarstad. Effectiveness of interventions to improve patient compliance: a meta-analysis. Med Care. 1998;36:1138-1161.
20. J.M.GierischJ.T.DeFrankJ.M.Bowling. Finding the minimal intervention needed for sustained mammography adherence. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39:334-344.
21. T.M.VogtA.GlassR.E.GlasgowP.A.La ChanceE.Lichtenstein. The safety net: a cost-effective approach to improving breast and cervical cancer screening. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2003;12:789-798.
22. R.M.AndersonD.C.MuschR.B.Nwankwo. Personalized follow-up increases return rate at urban eye disease screening clinics for African Americans with diabetes: results of a randomized trial. Ethn Dis. 2003;13:40-46.
23. P.OrrY.BarronO.D.ScheinG.S.RubinS.K.West. Eye care utilization by older Americans: the SEE Project. Salisbury Eye Evaluation. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:904-909.
24. F.WangJ.C.Javitt. Eye care for elderly Americans with diabetes mellitus: failure to meet current guidelines. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:1744-1750.
25. N.J.EllishR.Royak-SchalerS.R.PassmoreE.J.Higginbotham. Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about dilated eye examinations among African-Americans. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:1989-1994.
26. M.E.HartnettI.J.KeyN.M.LoyacanoR.L.HorswellK.B.Desalvo. Perceived barriers to diabetic eye care: qualitative study of patients and physicians. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:387-391.
27. E.A.WalkerC.E.BaschC.J.HowardP.A.ZybertW.N.KromholzH.Shamoon. Incentives and barriers to retinopathy screening among African-Americans with diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 1997;11:298-306.