DKPro similarity: An open source framework for text similarity

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 2013-August, Issue , 2013, Pages 121-126

  Bär, Daniel ^a   Zesch, Torsten ^a,b   Gurevych, Iryna ^a,b  

^a DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b German Institute for Educational Research and Educational Information

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMON SUBSEQUENCE; DIMENSIONAL VECTORS; HIGH-DIMENSIONAL; HIGHER-DIMENSIONAL; N-GRAMS; OPEN SOURCE FRAMEWORKS; SIMILARITY MEASURE; SIMPLE++; STANDARDIZED INTERFACES; TEXT SIMILARITY;

EID: 84960103968     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Eneko Agirre, Daniel Cer, Mona Diab, and Aitor Gonzalez-Agirre. 2012. SemEval-2012 Task 6: A Pilot on Semantic Textual Similarity. In Proc. of the 6th Int’l Works. on Semantic Eval., pages 385–393.
2. Daniel Bär, Chris Biemann, Iryna Gurevych, and Torsten Zesch. 2012a. UKP: Computing Semantic Textual Similarity by Combining Multiple Content Similarity Measures. In Proc. of the 6th Int’l Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pages 435–440.
3. Daniel Bär, Torsten Zesch, and Iryna Gurevych. 2012b. Text Reuse Detection Using a Composition of Text Similarity Measures. In Proc. of the 24th Int’l Conf. on Computational Linguistics, pages 167–184.
4. Sam Chapman, Barry Norton, and Fabio Ciravegna. 2005. Armadillo: Integrating Knowledge for the Semantic Web. In Proceedings of the Dagstuhl Seminar in Machine Learning for the Semantic Web.
5. Paul Clough, Robert Gaizauskas, Scott S.L. Piao, and Yorick Wilks. 2002. METER: MEasuring TExt Reuse. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 152–159.
6. William W. Cohen, Pradeep Ravikumar, and Stephen Fienberg. 2003. A Comparison of String Metrics for Matching Names and Records. In Proc. of KDD Works. on Data Cleaning and Object Consolidation.
7. Ido Dagan, Oren Glickman, and Bernardo Magnini. 2006. The PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge. In Machine Learning Challenges, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 177–190.
8. Liviu P. Dinu and Marius Popescu. 2009. Ordinal measures in authorship identification. In Proceedings of the 3rd PAN Workshop. Uncovering Plagiarism, Authorship and Social Software Misuse, pages 62–66.
9. David Ferrucci and Adam Lally. 2004. UIMA: An Architectural Approach to Unstructured Information Processing in the Corporate Research Environment. Natural Language Engineering, 10(3-4):327–348.
10. Evgeniy Gabrilovich and Shaul Markovitch. 2007. Computing Semantic Relatedness using Wikipedia-based Explicit Semantic Analysis. In Proceedings of IJCAI, pages 1606–1611, Hyderabad, India.
11. Konstantina Garoufi, Torsten Zesch, and Iryna Gurevych. 2008. Representational Interoperability of Linguistic and Collaborative Knowledge Bases. In Proceedings of the KONVENS Workshop on Lexical-Semantic and Ontological Resources.
12. Mark Hall, Eibe Frank, Geoffrey Holmes, Bernhard Pfahringer, Peter Reutemann, and Ian H. Witten. 2009. The WEKA Data Mining Software: An Update. SIGKDD Explorations, 11(1):10–18.
13. Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou, Judith L. Klavans, and Eleazar Eskin. 1999. Detecting text similarity over short passages: Exploring linguistic feature combinations via machine learning. In Proceedings of EMNLP/VLC, pages 203–212.
14. Jay J. Jiang and David W. Conrath. 1997. Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In Proceedings of ROCLING, pages 19–33.
15. David Jurgens and Keith Stevens. 2010. The S-Space Package: An Open Source Package for Word Space Models. In Proceedings of the ACL 2010 System Demonstrations, pages 30–35, Uppsala, Sweden.
16. Donald E. Knuth. 1973. The Art of Computer Programming: Volume 3, Sorting and Searching. Addison-Wesley.
17. Thomas K. Landauer, Peter W. Foltz, and Darrell La-ham. 1998. An Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2):259–284.
18. Vladimir I. Levenshtein. 1966. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, 10(8):707–710.
19. Philip M. McCarthy and Scott Jarvis. 2010. MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior research methods, 42(2):381–392.
20. Rada Mihalcea, Courtney Corley, and Carlo Strapparava. 2006. Corpus-based and Knowledge-based Measures of Text Semantic Similarity. In Proceedings of AAAI-06, pages 775–780, Boston, MA, USA.
21. Alvaro Monge and Charles Elkan. 1997. An efficient domain-independent algorithm for detecting approximately duplicate database records. In Proceedings of the SIGMOD Workshop on Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pages 23–29.
22. Ted Pedersen, Siddharth Patwardhan, and Jason Michelizzi. 2004. WordNet::Similarity - Measuring the Relatedness of Concepts. In Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL: Demonstration Papers, pages 38–41.
23. Lawrence Philips. 2000. The double metaphone search algorithm. C/C++ Users Jour., 18(6):38–43.
24. Philip Resnik. 1995. Using Information Content to Evaluate Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy. In Proceedings of the IJCAI, pages 448–453.
25. Efstathios Stamatatos. 2011. Plagiarism detection using stopword n-grams. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(12):2512–2527.
26. Dominic Widdows and Trevor Cohen. 2010. The Semantic Vectors Package: New Algorithms and Public Tools for Distributional Semantics. In Proceedings of IEEE-ICSC, pages 9–15.
27. William E. Winkler. 1990. String Comparator Metrics and Enhanced Decision Rules in the Fellegi-Sunter Model of Record Linkage. In Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, pages 354–359.
28. Michael J. Wise. 1996. YAP3: Improved detection of similarities in computer program and other texts. In Proc. of the 27th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 130–134.