Overall safety performance of the Air Traffic Management system: The Italian ANSP's experience on APF

Research in Transportation Business and Management

Volumn 20, Issue , 2016, Pages 3-12

  Di Gravio, Giulio ^a   Patriarca, Riccardo ^a   Mancini, Maurizio ^b   Costantino, Francesco ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b ENAV S P A   (Italy)

Author keywords

AHP; Risk assessment; Safety analysis; Safety events

Indexed keywords

EID: 84959922361     PISSN: 22105395     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. De Felice, F., Petrillo, A., Proposal of a structured methodology for the measure of intangible criteria and for decision making. International Journal of Simulation and Process Modelling, 9, 2014, 157, 10.1504/IJSPM.2014.064392.
2. Di Gravio, G., Mancini, M., Patriarca, R., Costantino, F., Overall safety performance of the Air Traffic Management system: Indicators and analysis. Journal of Air Tranport Management 44-45 (2015), 65–69.
3. Di Gravio, G., Mancini, M., Patriarca, R., Costantino, F., Overall safety performance: Forecasting and monitoring. Safety Science 72 (2015), 351–362.
4. Di Gravio, G., Patriarca, R., Mancini, M., Costantino, F., ATM safety management: Reactive and proactive indicators. Proceedings of the Fourth SESAR Innovation Days (SIDs 2014), 25th–27th November, Madrid, Spain, 2014.
5. Esser, J.K., Alive and well after 25 years: A review of groupthink research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 73:2–3 (1998), 116–141.
6. EU, Regulation No. 376/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014. Official Journal of the European Union, 2014, 18–43, L122.
7. EUROCONTROL, SRC POL DOC 1 — Safety minima study: Review of existing standards and practices, Brussels, Belgium. 2000.
8. EUROCONTROL, EAM4/GUI4 — A method for states to determine national ATM safety minima, Brussels, Belgium. 2004.
9. EUROCONTROL, A framework of indicators for the potential influence of ANS on air traffic safety in Europe. 2006, NLR, Brussels (Final Report).
10. EUROCONTROL, Establishment of just culture principles in ATM safety data reporting and assessment, EAM 2/GUI 6, Brussels, Belgium. 2006.
11. EUROCONTROL, Reporting and assessment of safety occurrences in ATM-ESARR 2, Brussels, Belgium. 2009.
12. EUROCONTROL, The Aerospace Performance Factor (APF) — Developing the EUROCONTROL ESARR 2 APF. Brussels, Belgium. 2009.
13. EUROCONTROL, Just culture policy, Brussels, Belgium. 2012.
14. EUROCONTROL, FAA, U.S./Europe comparison of ATM-related operational performance, Brussels, Belgium. 2012.
15. EUROCONTROL Performance Review Commission, Performance review report — An assessment of Air Traffic Management in Europe during the calendar year 2009. Brussels, Belgium. 2010.
16. European Parliament, European Council, Directive 2003/42/EC. Official Journal of the European Union L 167:46 (2003), 23–36.
17. Futron Corporation, The Aerospace Performance Factor — How the APF is changing the way aviation views safety information. 2010.
18. Hollnagel, E., A tale of two safeties. International Electronic Journal of Nuclear Safety and Simulation 4:1 (2013), 1–10.
19. ICAO, Annex 13 to the convention on international civil aviation — Aircraft accident and incident investiagtion, ninth ed. 2001.
20. ICAO, Doc 7300/9 — Convention on international civil aviation. Montréal, Canada. 2006.
21. ICAO, Doc 9859 AN/474 — Safety management manual (SMM). Montréal, Canada. 2nd ed., 2009.
22. ICAO, Doc 9750-AN/963-2013-2028. Global air navigation plan. Montréal, Canada. 4th ed., 2013.
23. ICAO, Doc 9562. Airport economics manual. Montréal, Canada. 3rd ed., 2013.
24. ISO 7870-2:2013, Control charts — Part 2: Shewhart control charts. 2013.
25. Licu, A., Cioponea, R., Stewart, S., Majumdar, A., Dupuy, M.D., The measurement of system-wide safety performance in aviation: Three case studies in the development of the aerospace performance factor (APF). EUROCONTROL R&D Seminar 2009, 21–22 October, Munich, Germany, 2009.
26. Lintner, T.M., Smith, S., Future concepts for measuring aviation safety, performance, & effectiveness. Proceedings of Society of System Safety Conference, Singapore, 2008, 2008.
27. Lintner, T.M., Smith, S., Licu, A., Cioponea, R., Stewart, S., Majumdar, A., Dupuy, M., The measurement of system-wide safety performance in aviation: Three case studies in the development of the Aerospace Performance Factor (APF). Proceedings of the Flight Safety Foundation International Aviation Safety Seminar, Beijing, 2009, 2009.
28. Lintner, T.M., Smith, S.D., Smurthwaite, S., The aerospace performance factor: Utilization of the analytical hierarchy process to develop a balanced performance and safety indicator of the national rreaidrspace system for the federal aviation administration. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (ISAHP 2009), Pittsburgh, USA, 29th July–1st August, 2009, 2009.
29. Mayer, M.A., Booker, J.M., Eliciting and analyzing expert judgment — A practical guide. 2001 (ISBN 0-89871-474-5).
30. Reason, J., The contribution of latent human failures to the breakdown of complex systems. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, London, UK, 1990.
31. Reason, J., Hollnagel, E., Paries, J., Revisiting the Swiss Cheese Model of Accidents. EUROCONTROL EEC Note No. 13/06, Brussels, Belgium, 2006.
32. Saaty, T.L., Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Service Science 1 (2008), 83–98.
33. Saaty, T.L., Alexander, J.M., Conflict resolution: The analytic hierarchy process. 1989, Praeger, New York, New York.