Effect of modification degree of nanohydroxyapatite on biocompatibility and mechanical property of injectable poly(methyl methacrylate)-based bone cement

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 104, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 576-584

  Quan, Changyun ^a   Tang, Yong ^a   Liu, Zhenzhen ^a   Rao, Minyu ^a   Zhang, Wei ^a   Liang, Peiqing ^a   Wu, Nan ^a   Zhang, Chao ^a   Shen, Huiyong ^a   Jiang, Qing ^a  

^a SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

biocompatibility; mechanical property; modification degree; nanohydroxyapatite; poly(methyl methacrylate)

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC MONOMERS; ALKALINITY; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE; CELL ADHESION; ESTERS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; PHOSPHATASES; REPAIR; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; THERMOGRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE ACTIVITY; BONE REPAIR MATERIALS; CLINICAL APPLICATION; COMPOSITE BONE CEMENTS; INTERFACIAL INTERACTION; MECHANICAL MEASUREMENTS; MODIFICATION DEGREES; NANO-HYDROXYAPATITE;

BONE CEMENT;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; BONE CEMENT; HYDROXYAPATITE; NANOCOMPOSITE; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE);

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMINERALIZATION; BONE REGENERATION; CELL ADHESION; CELL VIABILITY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME ASSAY; FETUS; HEMOLYSIS ASSAY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; OSTEOBLAST; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; THERMOGRAVIMETRY; CELL CULTURE; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECTS; MATERIALS TESTING; METABOLISM;

BONE CEMENTS; CELL ADHESION; CELLS, CULTURED; DURAPATITE; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; OSTEOBLASTS; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE;

EID: 84959882520     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33428     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Constantino PD, Freidman CD., Synthetic bone graft substitutes. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1994; 27: 1037-1073.
2. Cypher TJ, Grossman JP., Biological principles of bone graft healing. J Foot Ankle Surg 1996; 35: 413-417.
3. Lewis G., Properties of acrylic bone cement: state of the art review. J Biomed Mat Res Part A 1997; 38A: 155-182.
4. Heini PF, Walchli B, Berlemann U., Percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty with PMMA operative technique and early results. Eur Spine J 2000; 9: 445-450.
5. Kim YS, Kang YH, Kim JK, Park JB., The effect of bone mineral particles on the porosity of bone cement. Biomed Mater Eng 1994; 4: 37-46.
6. Harper EJ, Behiri JC, Bonfield W., Flexural and fatigue properties of a bone cement based upon polyethylmethacrylate and hydroxyapatite. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1995; 6: 799-803.
7. 3 enrichment at the surface of bioactive glasses studied by solution analysis. J Biomed Mat Res Part A 1993; 27: 941-948.
8. Andersson ÖH., Calcium phosphate formation at the surface of bioactive glass in vitro. J Biomed Mat Res Part A 1991; 25A: 1019-1030.
9. Harakas NK., Demineralized bone-matrix-induced osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984; 188: 239-251.
10. Kalita SJ, Bhardwaj A, Bhatt HA., Nanocrystalline calcium phosphate ceramics in biomedical engineering. Mat Sci Eng C 2007; 27: 441-449.
11. Sogal A, Hulbert SF., Mechanical properties of a composite bone cement: Polymethylmethacrylate and hydroxyapatite. Med Bioceram 1992; 5: 213-24.
12. Dai KR, Liu YK, Park JB., Bone particle impregnated bone cement: An in vivo weight-bearing study. J Biomed Mat Res 1991; 25: 141-156.
13. Rhee SH., Preparation of a bioactive poly(methyl methacrylate)/silica nanocomposite, J Am Ceram Soc 2002; 85: 1318-1320.
14. Carrodeguas RG, Lasa BV, Del Barrio JS., Injectable acrylic bone cements for vertebroplasty with improved properties. J Biomed Mat Res Part B 2004; 68B: 94-104 (2004).
15. Mousa WF., Biological and mechanical properties of PMMA-based bioactive bone cements. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 2137-2146.
16. Zhang HQ, Zhang M., Effect of surface treatment of hydroxyapatite whiskers on the mechanical properties of bis-GMA-based composites. Biomed Mater 2010; 5: 054106.
17. Rao MY, Su QW, Liu ZZ, Liang PQ, Quan CY, Jiang Q., Preparation and characterizations of PMMA-based composite bone cement containing poly(acrylate-co-silane)-modified hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. J Appl polym Sci 2014; 131: 40587-40594.
18. Kokubo T, Takadama H., How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone biocompatibility. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 2907-2915.
19. Quan CY, Wu DQ, Chang C, Zhang XZ, Zhuo RX., Synthesis of thermosensitive micellar aggregates self-assembled from biotinylated PNAS-b-PNIPAAm-b-PCL triblock copolymers for tumor targeting. J Phys Chem C. 2009; 113: 11262-11267.
20. Han JM, Li YB, Mo LR, Wang XJ, Xu FL, Wu X, Wu L., Study on the interfacial interaction between γ-(trimethoxysilyl) propyl methacrylate and nano-apatite. J Funct Meter 2005; 4: 629-632.
21. Tham WL, Chow WS, Mohd Ishak ZA., The effect of 3-(trimethoxysilyl) propyl methacrylate on the mechanical, thermal, and morphological properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)/hydroxyapatite composites. J Appl Polym Sci 2010; 118: 218-228.
22. Necheles TF, Boles TA, Allen DM., Erythrocyte glutathione-peroxidase deficiency and hemolytic disease of the newborn infant. J Pediat 1968; 72: 319-324.
23. Vozzi G, Corallo C, Daraio C., Pressure-activated microsyringe composite scaffold of poly(L-lactic acid) and carbon nanotubes for bone tissue engineering. J Appl Polym Sci 2013; 129: 528-536.
24. Wu B, Ma X, Zhu DM., Lentiviral delivery of biglycan promotes proliferation and increases osteogenic potential of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. J Mol Histol 2013; 44: 423-431.
25. Oyefusi A, Olanipekun O, Neelgund GM, Peterson D, Stone JM, Williams E, Carson L, Regisford G, Oki A., Hydroxyapatite grafted carbon nanotubes and graphene nanosheets: Promising bone implant materials. Spectrochim Acta A-Mol Biomol Spectrosc 2014; 132: 410-416.
26. Liu B, Fu XM, Wang D, Zhang W, Yang XL., Synthesis of organic-inorganic hybrid microspheres and the corresponding mesoporous silica nanoparticles. J Colloid Interface Sci 2013; 411: 98-104.
27. Launey ME, Chen PY, McKittrick J, Ritchie RO., Mechanistic aspects of the fracture toughness of elk antler bone. Acta Biomater 2010; 6: 1505-1514.
28. Tham WL, Chow WS, Ishak ZAM., The effect of 3-(trimethoxysilyl) propyl methacrylate on the mechanical, thermal, and morphological properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)/hydroxyapatite composites. J Appl Polym Sci 2012; 118: 218-228.
29. Sousa RA, Reis RL, Cunha AM, Bevis MJ., Coupling of HDPE/hydroxyapatite composites by silane-based methodologies. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003; 14: 475-487.
30. Shi XT, Wang YJ, Ren L, Zhao NR, Gong YH, Wang DA., Novel mesoporous silica-based antibiotic releasing scaffold for bone repair. Acta Biomater 2009; 5: 1697-1707.
31. Varma HK, Sreenivasan K, Yokogawa Y, Hosumi A., In vitro calcium phosphate growth over surface modified PMMA film. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 297-303.
32. Sagar N, Soni VP, Bellare JR., Influence of carboxymethyl chitin on stability and biocompatibility of 3D nanohydroxyapatite/gelatin/carboxymethyl chitin composite for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mat Res Part B 2012; 100B: 624-636.
33. Dalby MJ, Di Silvio L, Harper EJ, Bonfield W., Increasing hydroxyapatite incorporation into poly(methylmethacrylate) cement increases osteoblast adhesion and response. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 569-576.
34. Chung EJ, Sugimoto MJ, Ameer GA., The role of hydroxyapatite in citric acid-based nanocomposites: surface characteristics, degradation, and osteogenicity in vitro. Acta Biomater 2011; 7: 4057-4063.