Do supervised distributional methods really learn lexical inference relations?

NAACL HLT 2015 - 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 970-976

  Levy, Omer ^a   Remus, Steffen ^b   Biemann, Chris ^b   Dagan, Ido ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SINGLE WORDS; STATE-OF-THE-ART METHODS; WORD-PAIRS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84959876458     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/v1/n15-1098     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Marco Baroni and Alessandro Lenci. 2010. Distributional memory: A general framework for corpus-based semantics. Computational Linguistics, 36(4):673-721.
2. Marco Baroni and Alessandro Lenci. 2011. How we blessed distributional semantic evaluation. In Proceedings of the GEMS 2011Workshop on GEometrical Models of Natural Language Semantics, pages 1-10, Edinburgh, UK.
3. Marco Baroni, Raffaella Bernardi, Ngoc-Quynh Do, and Chung-chieh Shan. 2012. Entailment above the word level in distributional semantics. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 23-32, Avignon, France.
4. Chris Biemann and Martin Riedl. 2013. Text: Now in 2D! A framework for lexical expansion with contextual similarity. Journal of Language Modelling, 1(1):55-95.
5. John Caron. 2001. Experiments with LSA scoring: Optimal rank and basis. In Proceedings of the SIAM Computational Information Retrieval Workshop, pages 157-169.
6. Daoud Clarke. 2009. Context-theoretic semantics for natural language: an overview. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Geometrical Models of Natural Language Semantics, pages 112-119, Athens, Greece.
7. Ruiji Fu, Jiang Guo, Bing Qin, Wanxiang Che, Haifeng Wang, and Ting Liu. 2014. Learning semantic hierarchies via word embeddings. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1199-1209, Baltimore, Maryland.
8. Yoav Goldberg and Jon Orwant. 2013. A dataset of syntactic-ngrams over time from a very large corpus of english books. In Second Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (∗SEM), Volume 1: Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task: Semantic Textual Similarity, pages 241-247, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
9. Marti A Hearst. 1992. Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. In COLING 1992 Volume 2: The 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 529-545, Nantes, France.
10. David A Jurgens, Peter D Turney, Saif M Mohammad, and Keith J Holyoak. 2012. Semeval-2012 task 2: Measuring degrees of relational similarity. In∗SEM 2012: The First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics-Volume 1: Proceedings of the main conference and the shared task, and Volume 2: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2012), pages 356-364, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
11. Lili Kotlerman, Ido Dagan, Idan Szpektor, and Maayan Zhitomirsky-Geffet. 2010. Directional distributional similarity for lexical inference. Natural Language Engineering, 4(16):359-389.
12. Omer Levy and Yoav Goldberg. 2014. Dependencybased word embeddings. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pages 302-308, Baltimore, Maryland.
13. Omer Levy, Ido Dagan, and Jacob Goldberger. 2014. Focused entailment graphs for open ie propositions. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 87-97, Baltimore, Maryland.
14. Dekang Lin. 1998. Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Volume 2, pages 768-774, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
15. Tomas Mikolov, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeffrey Dean. 2013a. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
16. Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Gregory S Corrado, and Jeffrey Dean. 2013b. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 3111-3119.
17. Yoshiki Niwa and Yoshihiko Nitta. 1994. Co-occurrence vectors from corpora vs. distance vectors from dictionaries. In COLING 1994 Volume 1: The 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Kyoto, Japan.
18. Sebastian Padó and Mirella Lapata. 2007. Dependencybased construction of semantic space models. Computational Linguistics, 33(2):161-199.
19. Laura Rimell. 2014. Distributional lexical entailment by topic coherence. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 511-519, Gothenburg, Sweden.
20. Stephen Roller, Katrin Erk, and Gemma Boleda. 2014. Inclusive yet selective: Supervised distributional hypernymy detection. In Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, pages 1025-1036, Dublin, Ireland.
21. Enrico Santus, Alessandro Lenci, Qin Lu, and Sabine Schulteim Walde. 2014. Chasing hypernyms in vector spaces with entropy. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, volume 2: Short Papers, pages 38-42, Gothenburg, Sweden.
22. Hinrich Schütze. 1993. Part-of-speech induction from scratch. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 251-258, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
23. Rion Snow, Daniel Jurafsky, and Andrew Y Ng. 2005. Learning syntactic patterns for automatic hypernym discovery. In Advances in Neural Information Processing.
24. Peter D Turney and Saif M Mohammad. 2014. Experiments with three approaches to recognizing lexical entailment. Natural Language Engineering, pages 1-40.
25. Peter D Turney. 2006. Similarity of semantic relations. Computational Linguistics, 32(3):379-416.
26. Julie Weeds and David Weir. 2003. A general framework for distributional similarity. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 81-88, Sapporo, Japan.
27. Julie Weeds, Daoud Clarke, Jeremy Reffin, David Weir, and Bill Keller. 2014. Learning to distinguish hypernyms and co-hyponyms. In Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, pages 2249-2259, Dublin, Ireland.