Annotating argument components and relations in persuasive essays

COLING 2014 - 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of COLING 2014: Technical Papers

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1501-1510

  Stab, Christian ^a   Gurevych, Iryna ^a,b  

^a DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b German Institute for Educational Research   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LINGUISTICS;

ANNOTATION SCHEME; INTER-RATER AGREEMENTS; MANUAL ANNOTATION;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84959862465     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Ron Artstein and Massimo Poesio. 2008. Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics. Computational Linguistics, 34(4):555-596.
2. Yigal Attali, Will Lewis, and Michael Steier. 2013. Scoring with the computer: Alternative procedures for improving the reliability of holistic essay scoring. Language Testing, 30(1):125-141.
3. Beata Beigman Klebanov and Michael Flor. 2013. Argumentation-Relevant Metaphors in Test-Taker Essays. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Metaphor in NLP, pages 11-20, Atlanta, GA, USA.
4. Beata Beigman Klebanov and Derrick Higgins. 2012. Measuring the use of factual information in test-taker essays. In Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Building Educational Applications Using NLP, pages 63-72, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
5. Jamal Bentahar, Bernard Moulin, and Micheline Belanger. 2010. A taxonomy of argumentation models used for knowledge representation. Artificial Intelligence Review, 33(3):211-259.
6. Jill Burstein and Magdalena Wolska. 2003. Toward evaluation of writing style: Finding overly repetitive word use in student essays. In Proceedings of the tenth conference of European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, EACL'03, pages 35-42, Budapest, Hungary.
7. Jill Burstein, Karen Kukich, Susanne Wolff, Ji Lu, and Martin Chodorow. 1998. Enriching Automated EssayScoring Using Discourse Marking. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers, pages 15-21, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
8. Jodie A. Butler and M. Anne Britt. 2011. Investigating Instruction for Improving Revision of Argumentative Essays. Written Communication, 28(1):70-96.
9. Elena Cabrio and Serena Villata. 2012. Natural language arguments: A combined approach. In Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI'12, pages 205-210, Montpellier, France.
10. Jean Carletta. 1996. Assessing agreement on classification tasks: The kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics, 22(2):249-254.
11. Silvie Cinkova, Martin Holub, and VincentKŕѤz. 2012. Managing uncertainty in semantic tagging. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, EACL'12, pages 840-850, Avignon, France.
12. Jacob Cohen. 1960. A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1):37-46.
13. Vanessa Wei Feng and Graeme Hirst. 2011. Classifying arguments by scheme. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies-Volume 1, HLT'11, pages 987-996, Portland, OR, USA.
14. Joseph L. Fleiss. 1971. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5):378-382.
15. James B. Freemen. 2011. Argument Structure: Representation and Theory, volume 18 of Argumentation Library. Springer.
16. Klaus Krippendorff. 1980. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Sage.
17. Klaus Krippendorff. 2004. Measuring the Reliability of Qualitative Text Analysis Data. Quality & Quantity, 38(6):787-800.
18. Nitin Madnani, Michael Heilman, Joel Tetrault, and Martin Chodorow. 2012. Identifying High-Level Organizational Elements in Argumentative Discourse. In Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL HLT'12, pages 20-28, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
19. Raquel Mochales-Palau and Marie-Francine Moens. 2008. Study on the Structure of Argumentation in Case Law. In JURIX the twenty-first annual conference on legal knowledge and information systems, pages 11-20, Florence, Italy.
20. Raquel Mochales-Palau and Marie-Francine Moens. 2011. Argumentation mining. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 19(1):1-22.
21. Andreas Peldszus and Manfred Stede. 2013. From Argument Diagrams to Argumentation Mining in Texts: A Survey. International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence (IJCINI), 7(1):1-31.
22. Chris Reed, Raquel Mochales-Palau, Glenn Rowe, and Marie-Francine Moens. 2008. Language resources for studying argument. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC'08, pages 2613-2618, Marrakech, Morocco.
23. Niall Rooney, Hui Wang, and Fiona Browne. 2012. Applying kernel methods to argumentation mining. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, FLAIRS'12, pages 272-275, Marco Island, FL, USA.
24. Victor D. Sampson and Douglas B. Clark. 2006. Assessment of argument in science education: A critical review of the literature. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Sciences, ICLS'06, pages 655-661, Bloomington, IN, USA.
25. William A. Scott. 1955. Reliability of Content Analysis: The Case of Nominal Scale Coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19(3):321-325.
26. Alan Sergeant. 2013. Automatic argumentation extraction. In Proceedings of the 10th European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC'13, pages 656-660, Montpellier, France.
27. Mark D. Shermis and Jill Burstein. 2013. Handbook of Automated Essay Evaluation: Current Applications and New Directions. RoutledgeChapman&Hall.
28. Stephen E. Toulmin. 1958. The uses of Argument. CambridgeUniversity Press.
29. Maria Paz Garcia Villalba and Patrick Saint-Dizier. 2012. Some facets of argumentmining for opinion analysis. In Proceeding of the 2012 conference on ComputationalModels of Argument, COMMA'12, pages 23-34, Vienna, Austria.
30. DouglasWalton, Chris Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno. 2008. Argumentation Schemes. CambridgeUniversityPress.