A review corpus annotated for negation, speculation and their scope

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 3190-3195

  Konstantinova, Natalia ^a   De Sousa, Sheila C M ^a   Cruz, Noa P ^b   Maña, Manuel J ^b   Taboada, Maite ^c   Mitkov, Ruslan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HUELVA   (Spain)

^c SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Annotation; Corpus; Negation and speculation

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER PRODUCTS;

ANNOTATION; CORPUS; CORPUS SIZE; DOCUMENT MINING; NEGATION AND SPECULATION; SENTENCE LEVEL; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS;

REVIEWS;

EID: 84959862442     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Councill, I.; McDonald, R. and Velikovich, L. (2010). What's great and what's not: learning to classify the scope of negation for improved sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Negation and Speculation in Natural Language Processing.
2. Dadvar, M.; Hauff, C. and Jong, de F. (2011). Scope of negation detection in sentiment analysis. Dutch-Belgian Information Retrieval Workshop. Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
3. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20 (1): 37-46.
4. Konstantinova, N. and De Sousa, S. (2011). Annotating negation and speculation: the case of the review domain. In Student Workshop of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing. Hissar, Bulgaria.
5. Landis, J.R. and Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33 (1): 159-174.
6. Medlock, B. and Briscoe, T. (2007). Weakly supervised learning for hedge classification in scientific literature. In Proceedings of the ACL, pages 992-999, Prague, Czech Republic.
7. Morante, R.; Schrauwen, S. and Daelemans, W. (2011a). Corpus-based approaches to processing the scope of negation cues: an evaluation of the state of the art. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Computational Semantics, IWCS '11, pages 350-354, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. Morante, R.; Schrauwen, S. and Daelemans, W. (2011b). Annotation of negation cues and their scope. Guidelines v1.0. Technical Report Series CTR-003, CLiPS, University of Antwerp, Antwerp.
9. Settles, B.; Craven, M. and Friedland, L. (2008). Active learning with real annotation costs. In Proceedings of the NIPS Workshop on Cost-Sensitive Learning, pages 1-10.
10. Taboada, M.; Anthony, C. and Voll, K. (2006). Methods for creating semantic orientation dictionaries. In Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pages 427-432, Genoa, Italy.
11. Vincze, V.; Szarvas, G.; Farkas, R.; Móra, G. and Csirik J. (2008). The Bio-Scope corpus: biomedical texts annotated for uncertainty, negation and their scopes. BMC Bioinformatics, 9(Suppl 11):S9+.