Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods will be Positively Misleading

Systematic Biology

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 1978, Pages 401-410

  Felsenstein, Joseph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84959798530     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/27.4.401     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Camin, J. H., and R. R. Sokal. 1965. A method for deducing branching sequences in phylogeny. Evolution 19:311-326.
2. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and A. W. F. Edwards. 1967. Phylogenetic analysis: Models and estimation procedures. Evolution 32:550-570 (also in Amer. J. Human Genetics 19:233-257).
3. Dayhoff, M. O., and R. V. Eck. 1968. Atlas of protein sequence and structure 1967-1968. National Biomedical Research Foundation, Silver Spring, Maryland.
4. Edwards, A. W. F., and L. L. Cavalli-Sforza. 1964. Reconstruction of evolutionary trees. In Heywood, V. H., and J. McNeill (eds.), Phenetic and phylogenetic classification. Systematics Association Publication No. 6, London, pp. 67-76.
5. Estabrook. G. F. 1972. Cladistic methodology: A discussion of the theoretical basis for the induction of evolutionary history. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3:427-456.
6. Estabrook, G. F., C. S. Johnson, Jr., and F. R. McMorris. 1975. An idealized concept of the true cladistic character. Math. Biosci. 23:263-272.
7. Estabrook, G. F., and L. Landrum. 1975. A simple test for the possible simultaneous evolutionary divergence of two amino acid positions. Tax-on 24:609-613.
8. Estabrook, G. F., C. S. Johnson, Jr., and F. R. McMorris. 1976a. A mathematical foundation for the analysis of character compatibility. Math. Biosci. 29:181-187.
9. Estabrook, G. F., C. S. Johnson, Jr., and F. R. McMorris. 1976b. An algebraic analysis of cladistic characters. Discrete Math. 16:141-147.
10. Farris, J. S. 1969. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Syst. Zool. 18:374-385.
11. Farris. J. S. 1970. Methods for computing Wagner trees. Syst. Zool. 19:83-92.
12. Farris, J. S., A. G. Kluge, and M. J. Eckhardt. 1970. A numerical approach to phylogenetic sys-tematics. Syst. Zool. 19:172-189.
13. Farris, J. S. 1972. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Amer. Nat. 106:645-668.
14. Farris, J. S. 1973. On the use of the parsimony criterion for inferring evolutionary trees. Syst. Zool. 22:250-256.
15. Farris, J. S. 1977a. Phylogenetic analysis under Dollo's Law. Syst. Zool. 26:77-88.
16. Farris, J. S. 1977b. Some further comments on Le Quesne's methods. Syst. Zool. 26:220-223.
17. Feller, W. 1957. An introduction to probability theory and its applications. Volume I. Second edition. Wiley, New York.
18. Felsenstein, J. 1973. Maximum likelihood and minimum-steps methods for estimating evolutionary trees from data on discrete characters. Syst. Zool. 22:240-249.
19. Fitch, W. M., and E. Margoliash. 1967. Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science 155:279284.
20. Fitch, W. M. 1973. Aspects of molecular evolution. Ann. Rev. Gen. 7:343-380.
21. Kluge, A. G., and J. S. Farris. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zool. 18:1-32.
22. Le Quesne, W. J. 1969. A method of selection of characters in numerical taxonomy. Syst. Zool. 18:201-205.
23. Le Quesne, W. J. 1972. Further studies based on the uniquely derived character concept. Syst. Zool. 21:281-288.
24. Morris, F. R. 1977. On the compatibility of binary qualitative taxonomic characters. Bull. Math. Biol. 39:133-138.