Visual representation determines search difficulty: Explaining visual search asymmetries

Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience

Volumn 5, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Bruce, Neil D B ^a   Tsotsos, John K ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Asymmetry; Attention; Attentional bias; Natural image statistics; Novelty; Visual representation; Visual search

Indexed keywords

NEUROLOGY;

ASYMMETRY; ATTENTION; ATTENTIONAL BIAS; NATURAL IMAGE STATISTICS; NOVELTY; VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS; VISUAL SEARCH;

MEDICAL COMPUTING;

MODEL; PREDICTION; PRIMATE; STIMULUS; THINKING; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 84959566032     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16625188     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2011.00033     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Atick, J. J., Li, Z., and Redlich, A. N. (1992). Understanding retinal color coding from first principles. Neural Comput. 4, 559-572.
2. Atick, J., Li, Z., and Redlich, A. (1993). What does post-adaptation color appearance reveal about cortical color representation? Vis. Res. 33, 123-129.
3. Bruce, N. D. B., and Tsotsos, J. K. (2006). Saliency based on information maximization. Adv. Neural Inf. Process Syst. 18, 155-162.
4. Bruce, N. D. B., and Tsotsos, J. K. (2009). Saliency, attention, and visual search: an information theoretic approach. J. Vis. 9, 1-24.
5. Campbell, F., Kulikowski, J. J., and Levinson, J. (1966). The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings. J. Physiol. 187, 437-445.
6. Chapman, B., and Bonhoeffer, T. (1998). Overrepresentation of horizontal and vertical orientation preferences in developing ferret area 17. Neurobiology 95, 2609-2614.
7. Doherty, L. M., and Foster, D. H. (2001). Reference frame for rapid visual processing of line orientation. Spat. Vis. 14, 121-137.
8. Dong, D. W., and Atick, J. J. (1995). Statistics of natural time-varying images. Network 6, 345-358.
9. Essock, E. A., Haun, A. M., and Kim, Y. J. (2009). An anisotropy of orientation-tuned suppression that matches the anisotropy of typical natural scenes. J. Vis. 9, 1-15.
10. Field, D. J. (1987). Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response profiles of cortical cells. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 2379-2394.
11. Foster, D. H., and Ward, P. A. (1991). Asymmetries in oriented-line detection indicate two orthogonal filters in early vision. Proc. Biol. Sci. 243, 75-81.
12. Frith, U. (1974). A curious effect with reversed letters explained by a theory of schema. Percept. Psychophys. 16, 113-116.
13. Gao, D., Mahadevan, V., and Vasconcelos, N. (2008). On the plausibility of the discriminant center-surround hypothesis for visual saliency. J. Vis. 8, 1-18.
14. Hansen, B. C., and Essock, E. A. (2004). A horizontal bias in human visual processing of orientation and its correspondence to the structural components of natural scenes. J. Vis. 4, 1044-1060.
15. Hawley, K. J., Johnston, W. A., and Farnham, J. (1994). Novel popout with nonsense strings: effects of predictability of string length and spatial location. Percept. Psychophys. 55, 261-268.
16. Hyvärinen, A., and Hoyer, P. O. (2001). A two-layer sparse coding model learns simple and complex cell receptive fields and topography from natural images. Vision Res. 41, 2413-2423.
17. Itti, L., Koch, C., and Niebur, E. (1998). A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 20, 1254-1259.
18. Itti, L., and Koch, C. (2000). A saliencybased search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Res. 40, 1489-1506.
19. Koch, C., and Ullman, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. Hum. Neurobiol. 4, 219-227.
20. LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., and Haffner, P. (1998). Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc. IEEE 86, 2278-2324.
21. Lee, T., Girolami, M., and Sejnowski, T. (1999). Independent component analysis using an extended infomax alorithm for mixed subgaussian and supergaussian sources. Neural Comput. 11, 417-441.
22. Li, Z. (1996). A theory of the visual motion coding in the primary visual cortex. Neural Comput. 8, 705-730.
23. Li, Z. (1999). Contextual influences in v1 as a basis for pop out and asymmetry in visual search. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 10530-10535.
24. Long, F., Yang, Z., and Purves, D. (2006). Spectral statistics in natural scenes predict hue, saturation, and brightness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 6013-6018.
25. MacNeilage, P. R., Ganesan, N., and Angelaki, D. E. (2008). Computational approaches to spatial orientation: from transfer functions to dynamic bayesian inference. J. Neurophysiol. 100, 2981-2996.
26. Malinowski, P., and Hübner, R. (2001). The effect of familiarity on visual-search performance: evidence for learned basic features. Percept. Psychophys. 63, 458-463.
27. Marendaz, C., Stivalet, P, Barraclough, L., and Walkowiac, P. (1993). Effect of gravitational cues on visual search for orientation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 19, 1266-1277.
28. Marendaz, C. (1998). Nature and dynamics of reference frames in visual search for orientation: implications for early visual processing. Psychol. Sci. 9, 27-32.
29. May, K., and Zhaoping, L. (2009). Effects of surrounding frame on visual search for vertical or tilted bars. J. Vis. 9, 1-19
30. Mitchell, D. E., Freeman, R. D., and Westheimer, G. (1967). Effect of orientation on the modulation sensitivity for interference fringes on the retina. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 246-249.
31. Olshausen, B., and Field, D. (1996). Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature 381, 607-609.
32. Reicher, G. M., Snyder, C., and Richards, J. T. (1976). Familiarity of background characters in visual scanning. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2, 522-530.
33. Richards, J., and Reicher, G. M. (1978). The effect of background familiarity in visual search: an analysis of underlying factors. Percept. Psychophys. 23, 499-505.
34. Rosenholtz, R. (2001). Search asymmetries? What search asymmetries? Percept. Psychophys. 63, 476-489
35. Sagi, D. (1988). The combination of spatial frequency and orientation is effortlessly perceived. Percept. Psychophys. 43, 601-603.
36. Shen, J., and Reingold, E. M. (2001). Visual search asymmetry: the influence of stimulus familiarity and lowlevel features. Percept. Psychophys. 63, 464-475.
37. Tailor, D., Finkel, L., and Buchsbaum, G. (2000). Color opponent receptive fields derived from independent component analysis of natural images. Vision Res. 40, 2671-2676.
38. Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M., and Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual guidance of attention in natural scenes: the role of global features on object search. Psychol. Rev. 113, 766-786.
39. Treisman, A., and Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. Psychol. Rev. 95, 15-48.
40. van Hateren, J., and van der Schaaf, A. (1998). Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in the primary visual cortex. Proc. Biol. Sci. 265, 359-366.
41. Vincent, B. T., Baddeley, R. J., Troscianko, T., and Gilchrist, I. D. (2009). Optimal feature integration in visual search. J. Vis. 9, 1-11.
42. Wang, Q., Cavanagh, P., and Green, M. (1994). Familiarity and pop-out in visual search. Percept. Psychophys. 56, 495-500.
43. Wolfe, J. (1998). What can 1,000,000 trials tell us about visual search? Psychol. Sci. 9, 33-39.
44. Wolfe, J. (2001). Asymmetries in visual search: an introduction. Percept. Psychophys. 63, 381-389.
45. Wolfe, J., Friedman-Hill, S., Stewart, M., and O’Connell, K. (1992). The role of categorization in visual search for orientation. J. Exp. Psychol. 18, 34-49.
46. Wolfe, J., and Horowitz, T. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 1-7.
47. Wolfe, J. M. (2007). “Guided search 4.0: current progress with a model of visual search,” in Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems, ed. W. Gray (New York, NY: Oxford), 99-119.
48. Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., and Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 15, 419-433.
49. Zhang, L., Tong, M., Marks, T., Shan, H., and Cottrell, G. (2008). Sun: a bayesian framework for saliency using natural statistics. J. Vis. 8, 1-20.
50. Zhaoping, L., and Frith, U. (in press). A clash of bottom-up and topdown processes in visual search: the reversed letter effect revisited. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. doi: 10.1037/a0023099. [Epub ahead of print].