Application of an integrated multi-criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection

SpringerPlus

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Hanine, Mohamed ^a   Boutkhoum, Omar ^a   Tikniouine, Abdessadek ^a   Agouti, Tarik ^a  

^a CADI AYYAD UNIVERSITY   (Morocco)

Author keywords

AHP (analytic hierarchy process); Business Intelligence; ETL; ETL software selection problem; MCDM (multi criteria decision making); TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84959512422     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21931801     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-1888-z     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Amiri MP (2010) Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst Appl 37(9):6218–6224. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.103
2. Behzadian M, Otaghsara SK, Yazdani M (2012) Ignatius J (2012) A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Syst Appl 39(17):13051–13069
3. Dağdeviren M, Yavuz S, Kılınç N (2009) Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 36(4):8143–8151
4. Ding J-F (2012) Using Fuzzy MCDM Model to Select Middle Managers for Global Shipping Carrier-based Logistics Service Providers. WSEAS Transactions On Systems, 11(3)
5. Duran O (2011) Computer-aided maintenance management systems selection based on a fuzzy AHP approach. Adv Eng Software 42(10):821–829
6. Eldrandaly K, Naguib S (2013) A Knowledge-Based System for GIS Software Selection. Int Arab J Inf Technol 10(2):2013
7. Flintsch G, Zaniewski J, Delton J, Medina A (1998) Artificial Neural Network Based Project Selection Level Pavement Management System. In 4th International Conference on Managing Pavements
8. Göztepe K (2012) A Study on OS Selection Using ANP Based Choquet Integral in Terms of Cyber Threats. Int J Inf Security Sci. 1(2)
9. Gumus AT (2009) Evaluation of hazardous waste transportation firms by using a two step fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS methodology. Expert Syst Appl 36(2):4067–4074. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.03.013
10. Guo J, White J, Wang G, Li J, Wang Y (2011) A genetic algorithm for optimized feature selection with resource constraints in software product lines. J Syst Software 84(12):2208–2221
11. Huiqun Huang, Guang Sun (2012) ERP Software Selection Using The Rough Set And TPOSIS Methods Under Fuzzy Environment. Int J Adv Inf Sci Serv Scis 4(3):111–118. doi:10.4156/aiss.vol4.issue3.15
12. Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. In Springer, Heidelberg
13. ISO/IEC 9126-1 (2001) Software Engineering-Product Quality—Part 1: Quality Model, International Organization for Standardization
14. Kimball R, Caserta J, (2004) The data warehouse ETL toolkit practical techniques for extracting, cleaning, conforming, and delivering data. In chapter 2 eISBN: 0-764-57923-1
15. Lengacher D, Cammarata C (2012) A Two-Phase Data Envelopment Analysis Model for Portfolio Selection”. Adv Decision Sci 2012:1–9
16. Liberatore MJ, Nydick RL (1997) Group Decision Making In Higher Education Using The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Res Higher Educ 38(5):593–614
17. Lin HY, Hsu PY, Sheen GJ (2007) A fuzzy-based decision-making procedure for data warehouse system selection. Expert Syst Appl 32(3):939–953
18. Lin MC, Wang CC, Chen MS, Chang CA (2008) Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process. Comput Industry 59(1):17–31. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2007.05.013
19. Liu X (2012) The site selection of distribution center based on linear programming transportation method. In Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation
20. Mousavi S, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam MR, Heydar M, Ebrahimnejad S (2012) Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Plant Location Selection: an Integrated Delphi–AHP–PROMETHEE Methodology. Arab J Sci Eng 38(5):1255–1268
21. Onder E, Dag S (2013) Combining Analytical Hierarchy Process And TOPSIS Approaches For Supplier Selection In A Cable Company. J Business, Econ Finance 2(2):2013
22. Panda BN, Biswal BB, Deepak BBLV (2014) Integrated AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS Approach for the Selection of a Rapid Prototyping Process under Multi-Criteria Perspective
23. Saaty TL (2008) Decision Making With The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Int J Serv Sci 1(1):83
24. Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2001) Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science
25. Simitsis A, Vassiliadis P, Dayal U, Karagiannis A, Tziovara V (2009) Benchmarking ETL Workflows. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. pp 199–220
26. Tsaur R-C (2011) Decision risk analysis for an interval TOPSIS method. Appl Maths Comput 218(8):4295–4304
27. Wei C-C, Chien C-F, Wang M-J (2005) An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection. Int J Prod Econ 96(1):47–62
28. Wu K-Y (2010) Constructing Evaluation Model for Sustainable Development Community Health and Welfare. WSEAS Trans Syst 9(10):1073–1085
29. Wyatt L, Caufield B, Pol D (2009) Principles for an ETL Benchmark. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. pp 183–198
30. Yigit T, Isik AH, Ince M (2014) Web-based learning object selection software using analytical hierarchy process. IET Software 8(4):174–183. doi:10.1049/iet-sen.2013.0116
31. Yoo KE, Choi YC (2006) Analytic hierarchy process approach for identifying relative importance of factors to improve passenger security checks at airports. J Air Trans Manage 12(3):135–142
32. Zaidan AA, Zaidan BB, Al-Haiqi A, Kiah MLM, Hussain M, Abdulnabi M (2015) Evaluation and selection of open-source EMR software packages based on integrated AHP and TOPSIS. J Biomed Inform 53:390–404. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2014.11.012