Evidence-based recommendations for spine surgery

Spine

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2016, Pages E165-E173

  Vaccaro, Alexander R ^a   Fisher, Charles G ^b   Prasad, Srinivas K ^a   Patel, Alpesh A ^c   Chi, John ^d   Mulpuri, Kishore ^e   Thomas, Kenneth C ^f   Whang, Peter G ^g  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e BC CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^g YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE DISEASE; BRACE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; HUMAN; IMMOBILIZATION; METHODOLOGY; MOBILIZATION; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); ORTHOSIS; OSTEOPOROTIC VERTEBRAL BODY COMPRESSION FRACTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE SURGERY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ANIMAL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; NEUROSURGERY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROCEDURES; SPINAL DISEASES; STANDARDS;

ANIMALS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; SPINAL DISEASES;

EID: 84959481260     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001369     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Kim HJ, Y JM, Cho HG, et al. Comparative study of the treatment outcomes of osteoporotic compression fractures without neurologic injury using a rigid brace, a soft brace, and no brace. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96: 1959-66.
2. Cohen SP, Hayek S, Semenov Y, et al. Epidural steroid injections, conservative treatment, or combination treatment for cervical radicular pain: a multicenter, randomized, comparative-effectiveness study. Anesthesiology 2014; 121: 1045-55.
3. Smith JS, Shaffrey E, Klineberg E, et al. Prospective multicenter assessment of risk factors for rod fracture following surgery for adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine 2014; 21: 994-1003.
4. Protopsaltis T, Schwab F, Bronsard N, et al. The T1 pelvic angle, a novel radiographic measure of global sagittal deformity, accounts for both spinal inclination and pelvic tilt and correlates with health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96: 1631-40.
5. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 2257-70.
6. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, et al. Surgical compare with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 1295-304.
7. Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73: 802-8.
8. Mardjetko SM, Connolly PJ, Shott S. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. A meta-Analysis of literature 1970-1993. Spine 1994; 19: 2256S-65S.
9. Ghogawala Z, Benzel EC, Amin-Hanjani S, et al. Prospective outcomes evaluation after decompression with or without instrumented fusion for lumbar stenosis and degenerative Grade I spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 2004; 1: 267-72.
10. Martin CR, Gruszczynski AT, Braunsfurth HA, et al. The surgical management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review. Spine 2007; 32: 1791-8.
11. Rampersaud YR, Fisher C, Yee A, et al. Health-related quality of life following decompression compared to decompression and fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a Canadian multicentre study. Can J Surg 2014; 57: E126-33.
12. Richter A, Schultz C, Hauck M, et al. Does an interspinous device (Coflex) improve the outcome of decompressive surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis? One-year follow up of a prospective case control study of 60 patients. Eur Spine J 2010; 19: 283-9.
13. Richter A, Halm HF, Hauck M, et al. Two-year follow-up after decompressive surgery with and without implantation of an interspinous device for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective controlled study. J Spinal Disord Tech 2014; 27: 336-41.