A membrane-based microfluidic device for mechano-chemical cell manipulation

Biomedical Microdevices

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2016, Pages

  Ravetto, Agnese ^a   Hoefer, Imo E ^b   den Toonder, Jaap M J ^a   Bouten, Carlijn V C ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

chemical stimulation; circulating cell mechanics; integrated membrane; Mechanical deformation

Indexed keywords

BODY FLUIDS; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; DEFORMATION; DISEASES; DRUG INTERACTIONS; FLUIDIC DEVICES; MEMBRANES; MICROFLUIDICS; PROTEINS;

ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUGS; CELL MECHANICS; CHEMICAL MANIPULATION; CHEMICAL STIMULATION; LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDES; MECHANICAL DEFORMATION; MICRO-FLUIDIC DEVICES; MICROFLUIDIC CHANNEL;

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY;

CYTOCHALASIN D; LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE; PENTOXIFYLLINE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE;

ARTICLE; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CELL MANIPULATION; CHEMICAL CUE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MICROFLUIDIC DEVICE; MICROFLUIDICS; MONOCYTE; NANODEVICE; NANOFABRICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULATION; VALIDITY; VELOCITY; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BIOMECHANICS; CYTOLOGY; DEVICES; DIFFUSION; DRUG EFFECTS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HL-60 CELL LINE; LAB ON A CHIP; MECHANICS; POROSITY;

BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; CYTOCHALASIN D; CYTOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; DIFFUSION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HL-60 CELLS; HUMANS; LAB-ON-A-CHIP DEVICES; MECHANICAL PHENOMENA; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MONOCYTES; POROSITY;

EID: 84959454747     PISSN: 13872176     EISSN: 15728781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10544-016-0040-8     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. V.V. Abhyankar et al., Characterization of a membrane-based gradient generator for use in cell-signaling studies. Lab Chip 6(3), 389–393 (2006). Available at:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16511622
2. M. Abkarian, M. Faivre, H.A. Stone, High-speed microfluidic differential manometer for cellular-scale hydrodynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103(3), 538–542 (2006). Available at:http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1334647&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
3. A. Adamo et al., Microfluidics-based assessment of cell deformability. Anal. Chem. 84(15), 6438–6443 (2012)
4. S.-Y. Cheng et al., A hydrogel-based microfluidic device for the studies of directed cell migration. Lab Chip 7(6), 763–769 (2007). Available at:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17538719
5. W. Dai et al., A prototypic microfluidic platform generating stepwise concentration gradients for real-time study of cell apoptosis. Biomicrofluidics 4(2), 024101 14–16 (2010). Available at:http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2917874&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
6. G. Du et al., Cell types can be distinguished by measuring their viscoelastic recovery times using a micro-fluidic device. Biomed. Microdevices 13(1), 29–40 (2011). Available at:http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3028074&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
7. S. Gabriele et al., Microfluidic investigation reveals distinct roles for actin cytoskeleton and myosin II activity in capillary leukocyte trafficking. Biophys. J. 96(10), 4308–4318 (2009). Available at:http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2712202&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
8. T. Kim, M. Pinelis, M.M. Maharbiz, Generating steep, shear-free gradients of small molecules for cell culture. Biomed. Microdevices 11(1), 65–73 (2009). Available at:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18688724
9. W.A. Lam, M.J. Rosenbluth, D.A. Fletcher, Chemotherapy exposure increases leukemia cell stiffness. Blood 109(8), 3505–3508 (2007). Available at:http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1852256&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
10. W. Liu et al., Assay of glioma cell responses to an anticancer drug in a cell-based microfluidic device. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 9(4–5), 717–725 (2010). Available at:http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10404-010-0584-5
11. B. Ma et al., Characterization of drug metabolites and cytotoxicity assay simultaneously using an integrated microfluidic device. Lab Chip 9(2), 232–238 (2009). Available at:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19107278
12. S. Mao et al., Imitation of drug metabolism in human liver and cytotoxicity assay using a microfluidic device coupled to mass spectrometric detection. Lab Chip 12(1), 219–226 (2012). Available at:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22094544
13. A. Mehta, A.L. Zydney, Permeability and selectivity analysis for ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 249(1–2), 245–249 (2005). Available at:http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=16520080
14. B. Mosadegh et al., Generation of stable complex gradients across two-dimensional surfaces and three-dimensional gels. Langmuir 23(22), 10910–10912 (2007)
15. P. Neuner et al., Pentoxifylline in vivo and in vitro down-regulates the expression of the intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in monocytes. Immunology 90(3), 435–439 (1997). Available at:http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1456607&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
16. N.-T. Nguyen et al., Design, fabrication and characterization of drug delivery systems based on lab-on-a-chip technology. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65(11–12), 1403–1419 (2013). Available at:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23726943
17. P. Preira et al., Passive circulating cell sorting by deformability using a microfluidic gradual filter. Lab Chip 13(1), 161–170 (2013). Available at:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23147069
18. M.J. Rosenbluth, W.A. Lam, D.A. Fletcher, Analyzing cell mechanics in hematologic diseases with microfluidic biophysical flow cytometry. Lab Chip 8(7), 1062–1070 (2008). Available at:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18584080
19. P. Ruef et al., Effects of phosphodiesterase (III/IV)-inhibitors and cytokines on mechanical properties of neutrophilic granulocytes in neonates and adults. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 45(2–4), 301–310 (2010). Available at:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20675913
20. W. Saadi et al., Generation of stable concentration gradients in 2D and 3D environments using a microfluidic ladder chamber. Biomed. Microdevices 9(5), 627–635 (2007). Available at:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17530414
21. J.E. Souness et al., Evidence that cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase inhibitors suppress TNF alpha generation from human monocytes by interacting with a “low-affinity” phosphodiesterase 4 conformer. Br. J. Pharmacol. 118(3), 649–658 (1996). Available at:http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1909726&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
22. J.G. Wijmans, R.W. Baker, The solution-diffusion model: a review. J. Membr. Sci. 107(1–2), 1–21 (1995). Available at:http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=2919734
23. S.C. Wuang, B. Ladoux, C.T. Lim, Probing the chemo-mechanical effects of an anti-cancer drug emodin on breast cancer cells. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 4(3), 466–475 (2011). Available at:http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12195-011-0163-1