Divergent effects of external financing on technology innovation activity: Korean evidence

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 106, Issue , 2016, Pages 22-30

  Kim, Seokchin ^a   Lee, Hyunchul ^b   Kim, Joongi ^c  

^a Kyungpook National University   (South Korea)

^b Chosun University   (South Korea)

^c Korea Aerospace Industries Inc   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Bank loans; External financing; Manager discretion; Security issues; Technology innovation activity

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING RESEARCH; INVESTMENTS; MANAGERS;

BANK LOANS; EXTERNAL FINANCINGS; FINANCING DECISIONS; SECURITY ISSUES; TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION;

FINANCE;

BANKING; FINANCIAL SYSTEM; INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT; INDUSTRIAL PRACTICE; INNOVATION; LENDING BEHAVIOR; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

KOREA;

EID: 84959242685     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Atanassov J., Vikram K., Amit S. Finance and Innovation: the Case of publicly Traded Firms, Paper Presented at the American Finance Association Meeting 2007.
2. Bae S., Kwon T., Lee J. Does corporate diversification by business groups create value? evidence from Korean chaebols. Pac. Basin Financ. J. 2011, 19:535-553.
3. Baek J., Kang J., Lee I. Business groups and tunneling: evidence from private securities offerings by Korean chaebols. J. Financ. 2006, 61:415-2448.
4. Baltagi B. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data 2005, Wiley. third ed.
5. Baumol W. The Free-Market Innovation Machine 2001, Princeton University Press.
6. Becheikh N., Landry R., Amara N. Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993 to 2003. Technovation 2006, 26:644-664.
7. Beneito P. Choosing among alternative technological strategies: An empirical analysis of formal sources of innovation. Res. Policy 2003, 32:693-713.
8. Benfratello L., Schiantarelli F., Sembenelli A. Banks and innovation: microeconometric evidence on Italian firms. J. Financ. Econ. 2008, 90:197-217.
9. Ben-Zion U. The R&D and investment decision and its relationship to the firm's market value: some preliminary results in R&D, patents and productivity 1984, 299-314. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London. Z. Griliches (Ed.).
10. Bhagat S., Welch I. Corporate research and development investments international comparisons. J. Account. Econ. 1995, 19:443-470.
11. Bosworth D., Rogers M. Market value, R&D and intellectual property: An empirical analysis of large Australian firms. Econ. Rec. 2001, 77:323-337.
12. Branch B. Research and development activity and profitability. J. Polit. Econ. 1974, 82:999-1011.
13. Breusch T., Pagan A. The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev. Econ. Stud. 1980, 47:239-253.
14. Brown J., Petersen B.C. Cash holdings and R&D smoothing. J. Corp. Financ. 2011, 17:694-709.
15. Brown J.R., Fazzari S.M., Petersen B.C. Financing innovation and growth: cash flow, external equity, and the 1990s R&D boom. J. Financ. 2009, LXIV:151-185.
16. Brown W. R&D Intensity and Finance: Are Innovative Firms financially Constrained? 2000, London School of Economics Financial Market Group.
17. Carpenter R.E., Petersen B.C. Capital market imperfections, high-tech investment, and new equity financing. Econ. J. 2002, 112:54-72.
18. Cazurra A.C. Business groups and their types. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 2006, 23:419-437.
19. Chauvin K.W., Hirschey M. Advertising, R&D Expenditure and the Market Value of the Firm. Financ. Manag. 1993, 22:128-140.
20. Cohen W.M., Levin R.C., Mowery D.C. Firm size and R&D intensity: A re-examination. J. Ind. Econ. 1987, 35:543-565.
21. Dewatripont M., Maskin E. Credit and efficiency in centralized and decentralized economics. Rev. Econ. Stud. 1995, 62:541-555.
22. Driscoll J., Kraay A. Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1998, 80:549-560.
23. Giunta A., Trivieri F. Understanding the determinants of information technology adoption: evidence from Italian manufacturing firms. Appl. Econ. 2007, 29:1325-1334.
24. Grabowski H.G., Mueller D.C. Industrial research and development, intangible capital stocks and firm profit rates. Bell J. Econ. 1978, 9:328-343.
25. Griliches Z. Productivity, R&D, and basic research at the firm level in the 1970s. Am. Econ. Rev. 1986, 76:141-154.
26. Hall B. The Impact of Corporate Restructuring on Industrial Research and Development. Economics Working Paper 1990, University Of California at Berkley.
27. Hall B. The financing of research and development. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 2002, 18:35-51.
28. Hall B., Adam J., Manuel T. Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econ. 2005, 36:16-38.
29. Haselmann R., Marsch K., di Mauro B.Weder Real effect of bank governance: Bank ownership and corporate innovation. CEPR discussion paper, No. 7488, London 2009.
30. Herrera A.M., Minetti R. Informed finance and technological change: evidence from credit relationships. J. Financ. Econ. 2007, 83(1):223-269.
31. Himmelberg C., Petersen B. R&D and internal finance: A panel study of small firms in high-tech industries. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1994, 76:38-51.
32. Hirschey M., Weygandt J. Amortization policy for advertising and research and development expenditures. J. Account. Res. 1985, 23:326-335.
33. Hoechle D. Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross sectional dependence. Stata J. 2007, 7:281-312.
34. Kaplan S.N., Zingales L. Do investment-cash flows sensitivities provide useful measures of financial constraints?. Q. J. Econ. 1997, 112:169-215.
35. Kim I., Hoskisson R.E., Hong J. The evolution and restructuring of diversified business groups in emerging markets: the lessons from chaebols in Korea. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 2004, 21:25-48.
36. Kim J., Kim S., Lee H. An effect of technology innovation activity on firm value and a mediation effect of leverage: evidence from Korean firms. Asian J. Technol. Innov. 2011, 9:37-52.
37. Kleinknecht A., Montfort V., Brouwer E. The non-trivial choice between innovation indicators. Econ. Innov. N. Technol. 2002, 11:109-121.
38. Michie J. Introduction: the internationalization of the innovation process. Int. J. Econ. Bus. 1998, 53:261-277.
39. Muller E., Zimmermann V. The importance of equity finance for R&D activity. Small Business Economics. 2009, 33:303-318.
40. OECD Oslo Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data 1997, 2nd Edition.
41. Pesaran M.H. General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Sectional Dependence in Panels. Cambridge Working Paper in Economics 2004, University Of Cambridge.
42. Rajan R., Zingales L. , Banks and Markets: the Changing Character of European Finance. Paper Presented at the European Central Bank 2nd Annual Conference 2003.
43. Robertson D., Symons J. Factor Residual SUR Regresssions: Estimating Panels Allowing for Cross Sectional Correlation. Paper Presented at the CEP Discussion 2000, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics.
44. Scherer F. New Perspectives on Economic Growth and Technological Innovation 1984, Brookings Institution Press.
45. Schumpeter J. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy 1942, Harper and Row.
46. Solow R. Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1957, 39:312-320.
47. Stulz R. Does financial structure matter for economic growth?. A corporate finance perspective in financial structure and economic growth: A cross-country comparison of banks, markets, and development 2001, 143-188. A. Demirgus-Kunt, R. Levine (Eds.).
48. Svensson R. Publicly-funded R&D programs and survival of patents. Appl. Econ. 2013, 45:1343-1358.
49. Switzer L. The determinants of industrial R&D: A funds flow simultaneous equation approach. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1984, 66:163-168.
50. Toivanen O., Stoneman P., Bosworth D. Innnovation and the market value of UK firms, 1989-1995. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 2002, 64:36-61.