Clustering of static-adaptive correspondences for deformable object tracking

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn 07-12-June-2015, Issue , 2015, Pages 2784-2791

  Nebehay, Georg ^a,b   Pflugfelder, Roman ^b  

^a GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^b AIT AUSTRIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER VISION; IMAGE PROCESSING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; TARGET TRACKING; TRACKING (POSITION);

BOUNDING BOX; DEFORMABLE OBJECT; DISSIMILARITY MEASURES; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; KEYPOINTS; STABILITY-PLASTICITY DILEMMA; STATE OF THE ART; TARGET OBJECT;

DEFORMATION;

EID: 84959230795     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298895     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. W. C. Abraham and A. Robins. Memory retention-the synaptic stability versus plasticity dilemma. TINS, 28(2), 2005
2. A. Adam, E. Rivlin, and I. Shimshoni. Robust fragmentsbased tracking using the integral histogram. In CVPR, 2006
3. M. Cho, J. Lee, and J. Lee. Feature correspondence and deformable object matching via agglomerative correspondence clustering. In ICCV, 2009
4. M. A. Fischler and R. C. Bolles. Random sample consensus. CACM, 24(6), 1981
5. S. Hare, A. Saffari, and P. H. S. Torr. Struck: Structured output tracking with kernels. In ICCV, 2011
6. B. Hemery, H. Laurent, and C. Rosenberger. Comparative study of metrics for evaluation of object localisation by bounding boxes. In ICIG, 2007
7. Z. Kalal, K. Mikolajczyk, and J. Matas. Forward-Backward Error: Automatic Detection of Tracking Failures. In ICPR, 2010
8. Z. Kalal, K. Mikolajczyk, and J. Matas. Tracking-Learningdetection. TPAMI, 34(7), 2012
9. M. Leordeanu and M. Hebert. A spectral technique for correspondence problems using pairwise constraints. In ICCV, 2005
10. S. Leutenegger, M. Chli, and R. Y. Siegwart. BRISK: Binary robust invariant scalable keypoints. In ICCV, 2011
11. T. List, J. Bins, J. Vazquez, and R. B. Fisher. Performance evaluating the evaluator. In PETS, 2005
12. D. G. Lowe. Distinctive image features from Scale-Invariant keypoints. IJCV, 60(2), 2004
13. B. D. Lucas and T. Kanade. An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision. In IJCAI, 1981
14. L. Matthews, T. Ishikawa, and S. Baker. The template update problem. TPAMI, 26(6), 2004
15. K. Mikolajczyk and C. Schmid. A performance evaluation of local descriptors. TPAMI, 27(10), 2005
16. G. Nebehay and R. Pflugfelder. Consensus-based matching and tracking of keypoints for object tracking. In WACV, 2014
17. F. Pernici and A. Del Bimbo. Object tracking by oversampling local features. TPAMI, 36(12), 2014
18. J. Santner, C. Leistner, A. Saffari, T. Pock, and H. Bischof. Parallel robust online simple tracking. In CVPR, 2010
19. T. Tuytelaars and K. Mikolajczyk. Local invariant feature detectors: a survey. FTCGV, 3, 2008
20. T. Vojir and J. Matas. The enhanced flock of trackers. In RRIV. 2014
21. Y. Wu, J. Lim, and M.-H. Yang. Online object tracking: A benchmark. In CVPR, 2013
22. R. Xu and D. Wunsch. Survey of clustering algorithms. TNN, 16(3), 2005
23. R. Zass and A. Shashua. Probabilistic graph and hypergraph matching. In CVPR, 2008
24. K. Zhang, L. Zhang, and M.-H. Yang. Real-Time compressive tracking. In ECCV, 2012
25. W. Zhong, H. Lu, and M.-H. Yang. Robust object tracking via sparsity-based collaborative model. In CVPR, 2012.