An interactive environment for agile analysis and visualization of ChIP-sequencing data

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 349-357

  Lerdrup, Mads ^a,b   Johansen, Jens Vilstrup ^a,b   Agrawal Singh, Shuchi ^a,b   Hansen, Klaus ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION SEQUENCING; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; GENOME; HUMAN; INFORMATION; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); MICROCOMPUTER; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCIENTIST; SCREENING; WORKFLOW; ANIMAL; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE;

POLYCOMB GROUP PROTEIN;

ANIMALS; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; GENOME; MICE; POLYCOMB-GROUP PROTEINS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84959215521     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.3180     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Nekrutenko, A. &Taylor, J. Next-generation sequencing data interpretation: enhancing reproducibility and accessibility. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 667-672 (2012).
2. Plocik, A.M. &Graveley, B.R. New insights from existing sequence data: generating breakthroughs without a pipette. Mol. Cell 49, 605-617 (2013).
3. Marx, V. Biology: the big challenges of big data. Nature 498, 255-260 (2013).
4. Bernstein, B.E. et al. The NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 1045-1048 (2010).
5. Consortium, E.P. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57-74 (2012).
6. Edgar, R., Domrachev, M. &Lash, A.E. Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 207-210 (2002).
7. Chelaru, F., Smith, L., Goldstein, N. &Bravo, H.C. Epiviz: interactive visual analytics for functional genomics data. Nat. Methods 11, 938-940 (2014).
8. Nielsen, C.B. et al. Spark: a navigational paradigm for genomic data exploration. Genome Res. 22, 2262-2269 (2012).
9. Coulombe, C. et al. VAP: a versatile aggregate profiler for efficient genome-wide data representation and discovery. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W485-W493 (2014).
10. Huang, W., Loganantharaj, R., Schroeder, B., Fargo, D. &Li, L. PAVIS: a tool for peak annotation and visualization. Bioinformatics 29, 3097-3099 (2013).
11. Ji, H. et al. An integrated software system for analyzing ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq data. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1293-1300 (2008).
12. Robinson, J.T. et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 24-26 (2011).
13. Sadeghi, L., Bonilla, C., Strålfors, A., Ekwall, K. &Svensson, J.P. Podbat: a novel genomic tool reveals Swr1-independent H2A.Z incorporation at gene coding sequences through epigenetic meta-analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002163 (2011).
14. Salmon-Divon, M., Dvinge, H., Tammoja, K. &Bertone, P. PeakAnalyzer: genome-wide annotation of chromatin binding and modification loci. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 415 (2010).
15. Ye, T. et al. seqMINER: an integrated ChIP-seq data interpretation platform. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, e35 (2011).
16. Giardine, B. et al. Galaxy: a platform for interactive large-scale genome analysis. Genome Res. 15, 1451-1455 (2005).
17. Halbritter, F., Vaidya, H.J. &Tomlinson, S.R. GeneProf: analysis of high-throughput sequencing experiments. Nat. Methods 9, 7-8 (2012).
18. Liu, T. et al. Cistrome: an integrative platform for transcriptional regulation studies. Genome Biol. 12, R83 (2011).
19. Gentleman, R.C. et al. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 5, R80 (2004).
20. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2008).
21. Bendall, S.C. &Nolan, G.P. From single cells to deep phenotypes in cancer. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 639-647 (2012).
22. Barski, A. et al. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 129, 823-837 (2007).
23. Anders, S., Pyl, P.T. &Huber, W. HTSeq: a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166-169 (2015).
24. Quinlan, A.R. &Hall, I.M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841-842 (2010).
25. Gautier, L., Cope, L., Bolstad, B.M. &Irizarry, R.A. affy: analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level. Bioinformatics 20, 307-315 (2004).
26. Kharchenko, P.V., Tolstorukov, M.Y. &Park, P.J. Design and analysis of ChIP-seq experiments for DNA-binding proteins. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1351-1359 (2008).
27. Landt, S.G. et al. ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia. Genome Res. 22, 1813-1831 (2012).
28. Marinov, G.K., Kundaje, A., Park, P.J. &Wold, B.J. Large-scale quality analysis of published ChIP-seq data. G3 (Bethesda) 4, 209-223 (2014).
29. Cleveland, W.S. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74, 829-836 (1979).
30. Cleveland, W.S. Lowess: a program for smoothing scatterplots by robust locally weighted regression. Am. Stat. 35, 54 (1981).
31. Amaratunga, D. &Cabrera, J. Analysis of data from viral DNA microchips. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 96, 1161-1170 (2001).
32. Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
33. Liang, K. &Keles, S. Normalization of ChIP-seq data with control. BMC Bioinformatics 13, 199 (2012).
34. Pepke, S., Wold, B. &Mortazavi, A. Computation for ChIP-seq and RNA-seq studies. Nat. Methods 6, S22-S32 (2009).
35. Wilbanks, E.G. &Facciotti, M.T. Evaluation of algorithm performance in ChIP-seq peak detection. PLoS One 5, e11471 (2010).
36. Johnson, D.S., Mortazavi, A., Myers, R.M. &Wold, B. Genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein-DNA interactions. Science 316, 1497-1502 (2007).
37. Jiang, H., Wang, F., Dyer, N.P. &Wong, W.H. CisGenome Browser: a flexible tool for genomic data visualization. Bioinformatics 26, 1781-1782 (2010).
38. Valouev, A. et al. Genome-wide analysis of transcription factor binding sites based on ChIP-Seq data. Nat. Methods 5, 829-834 (2008).
39. Simon, J.A. &Kingston, R.E. Occupying chromatin: Polycomb mechanisms for getting to genomic targets, stopping transcriptional traffic, and staying put. Mol. Cell 49, 808-824 (2013).
40. Steffen, P.A. &Ringrose, L. What are memories made of? How Polycomb and Trithorax proteins mediate epigenetic memory. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 340-356 (2014).
41. Margueron, R. &Reinberg, D. The Polycomb complex PRC2 and its mark in life. Nature 469, 343-349 (2011).
42. Di Croce, L. &Helin, K. Transcriptional regulation by Polycomb group proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1147-1155 (2013).
43. Blackledge, N.P. et al. Variant PRC1 complex-dependent H2A ubiquitylation drives PRC2 recruitment and polycomb domain formation. Cell 157, 1445-1459 (2014).
44. Farcas, A.M. et al. KDM2B links the Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) to recognition of CpG islands. eLife 1, e00205 (2012).
45. He, J. et al. Kdm2b maintains murine embryonic stem cell status by recruiting PRC1 complex to CpG islands of developmental genes. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 373-384 (2013).
46. Wu, X., Johansen, J.V. &Helin, K. Fbxl10/Kdm2b recruits polycomb repressive complex 1 to CpG islands and regulates H2A ubiquitylation. Mol. Cell 49, 1134-1146 (2013).
47. Riising, E.M. et al. Gene silencing triggers polycomb repressive complex 2 recruitment to CpG islands genome wide. Mol. Cell 55, 347-360 (2014).
48. Klose, R.J., Cooper, S., Farcas, A.M., Blackledge, N.P. &Brockdorff, N. Chromatin sampling: an emerging perspective on targeting polycomb repressor proteins. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003717 (2013).
49. Hansen, K.H. et al. A model for transmission of the H3K27me3 epigenetic mark. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 1291-1300 (2008).
50. Margueron, R. et al. Role of the polycomb protein EED in the propagation of repressive histone marks. Nature 461, 762-767 (2009).
51. Cooper, S. et al. Targeting polycomb to pericentric heterochromatin in embryonic stem cells reveals a role for H2AK119u1 in PRC2 recruitment. Cell Rep. 7, 1456-1470 (2014).
52. Kalb, R. et al. Histone H2A monoubiquitination promotes histone H3 methylation in Polycomb repression. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 569-571 (2014).
53. Denissov, S. et al. Mll2 is required for H3K4 trimethylation on bivalent promoters in embryonic stem cells, whereas Mll1 is redundant. Development 141, 526-537 (2014).
54. Moon, T.S., Lou, C., Tamsir, A., Stanton, B.C. &Voigt, C.A. Genetic programs constructed from layered logic gates in single cells. Nature 491, 249-253 (2012).
55. Dietrich, N. et al. REST-mediated recruitment of polycomb repressor complexes in mammalian cells. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002494 (2012).
56. Tavares, L. et al. RYBP-PRC1 complexes mediate H2A ubiquitylation at polycomb target sites independently of PRC2 and H3K27me3. Cell 148, 664-678 (2012).
57. Pengelly, A.R., Copur, Ö., Jäckle, H., Herzig, A. &Müller, J. A histone mutant reproduces the phenotype caused by loss of histone-modifying factor Polycomb. Science 339, 698-699 (2013).
58. Bernstein, E. et al. Mouse polycomb proteins bind differentially to methylated histone H3 and RNA and are enriched in facultative heterochromatin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 2560-2569 (2006).
59. Kent, W.J. et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 12, 996-1006 (2002).
60. Saldanha, A.J. Java Treeview: extensible visualization of microarray data. Bioinformatics 20, 3246-3248 (2004).
61. Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. &Salzberg, S.L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009).
62. Li, H. et al. 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078-2079 (2009).
63. Benjamini, Y. &Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol. 57, 289-300 (1995).
64. Pruitt, K.D. et al. RefSeq: an update on mammalian reference sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D756-D763 (2014).