A patient perspective on shared decision making in stage I non-small cell lung cancer: A mixed methods study

BMC Cancer

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Hopmans, Wendy ^a   Damman, Olga C ^a   Senan, Suresh ^a   Hartemink, Koen J ^b   Smit, Egbert F ^a,b   Timmermans, Danielle R M ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ANTONI VAN LEEUWENHOEK HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Patient perspective; Shared decision making; Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy; Surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LUNG SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MIXED METHODS STUDY; NON SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT GUIDANCE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SHARED DECISION MAKING; STEREOTACTIC ABLATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; STEREOTACTIC TREATMENT; VERY ELDERLY; CANCER STAGING; CARCINOMA, NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; LUNG NEOPLASMS; LUNG RESECTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOSURGERY;

ADULT; AGED; CARCINOMA, NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PNEUMONECTOMY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RADIOSURGERY;

EID: 84959148651     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712407     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1974-6     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Stiggelbout AM, van der Weijden T, de Wit MPT, Frosch D, Legare F, Montori VM, et al. Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. BMJ. 2012;344:e256.
2. Elwyn G, Laitner S, Coulter A, Walker E, Watson P, Thomson R. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. BMJ. 2010;341:c5146.
3. Walker RL. Medical ethics needs a new view of autonomy. J Med Philos. 2008;33:594-608.
4. Entwistle VA, Carter SM, Cribb A, McCaffery K. Supporting patient autonomy: the importance of clinical relationships. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:741-5.
5. Chewning B, Bylund CL, Shah B, Arora NK, Gueguen JA, Makoul G. Patient preferences for shared decisions: A systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;86:9-18.
6. Brom L, Hopmans W, Pasman HR, Timmermans DRM, Widdershoven GA, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD. Congruence between patients' preferred and perceived participation in medical decision-making: a review of the literature. BMC Med Inform Dec Mak. 2014;14:25.
7. Edwards A, Elwyn G. Inside the black box of shared decision making - Distinguishing between the process of involvement and who makes the decision. Health Expect. 2006;9:307-20.
8. Stacey D, Samant R, Bennett C. Decision making in oncology: a review of patient decision aids to support patient participation. CA Can J Clin. 2008;58:293-304.
9. Westert GP, Faber M. Commentary: the Dutch approach to unwarranted medical practice variation. BMJ. 2011;342:d1429.
10. O'Connor AM, Wennberg JE, Légaré F, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Moulton BW, Sepucha KR, et al. Toward the 'tipping point': decision aids and informed patient choice. Health Aff. 2007;26(3):716-25.
11. Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;10:CD001431.
12. Lawler M, Le Chevalier T, Murphy Jr MJ, Banks I, Conte P, De Lorenzo F, et al. A catalyst for change: the European cancer Patient's bill of rights. Oncologist. 2014;19(3):217-24.
13. Salzburg Global Seminar. Salzburg statement on Shared Decision Making. BMJ. 2011;342:d1745.
14. Wennberg JE. Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: implications for academic medical centres. BMJ. 2002;325(7370):961-4.
15. Lantz P, Janz N, Fagerlin A, Swartz K, Liu L, Lakhani I, et al. Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(3):745-67.
16. Brom L, Pasman HW, Widdershoven GAM, van der Vorst MJDL, Reijneveld JC, Postma TJ, et al. Patient preferences for participation in treatment decision-making at the end of life: Qualitative interviews with advanced cancer patients. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):e100435.
17. Smith BD, Smith GL, Hurria A, Hortobagyi GN, Buchholz TA. Future of cancer incidence in de United States: burdens upon an aging, changing nation. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(17):2758-65.
18. Vansteenkiste J, De Ruysscher D, Eberhardt WE, Lim E, Senan S, Felip E, et al. Early and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013;24 Suppl 6:vi89-98.
19. Louie AV, Palma DA, Dahele M, Rodriques GB, Senan S. Management of early stage non-small cell lung cancer using stereotactic ablative radiotherapy: controversies, insights, and changing horizons. Radiother Oncol. 2015;114(2):138-47.
20. Sinding C, Hudak P, Wiernikowski J, Aronson J, Miller P, Gould J, et al. "I like to be an important person but..." negotiating responsibility for treatment decisions in cancer care. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71:1094-101.
21. Fiks AG, Hughes CC, Gafen A, Guevara JP, Barg FK. Contrasting parents' and pediatricians' perspectives on shared decision-making in ADHD. Pediatrics. 2011;127(1):e188-196.
22. Rise MB, Solbjor M, Lara MC, Westerlund H, Steinsbekk A. Same description, different values. How service users and providers define patient and public involvement in health care. Health Expect. 2011;16(3):266-7.
23. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Smith C, Williams S, Thornton H. Consumers' views of quality in the consultation and their relevance to 'shared decision-making' approaches. Health Expect. 2001;4(3):151-61.
24. Woltmann EM, Whitley R. Shared decision making in public mental health care: perspectives from consumers living with severe mental illness. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2010;34(1):29-36.
25. Pieterse AH, Baas-Thijssen MCM, Marijnen CAM, Stiggelbout AM. Clinician and cancer patients views on participation in treatment decision making: a quantitative and qualitative exploration. BMJ. 2008;99:875-82.
26. Mandelblatt JS, Faul LA, Luta G, Makgoeng SB, Isaacs C, Taylor K, et al. Patient and physician decision styles and breast cancer chemotherapy use in older women: Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocol 369901. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(21):2609-14.
27. Shelton RC, Clarke Hillyer G, Herschman DL, Leoce N, Bovbjerg DH, Mandelblatt JS, et al. Interpersonal influences and attitudes about adjuvant therapy treatment decisions among non-metastatic breast cancer patients: an examination of differences by age and race-ethnicity in the BQUAL study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;137(3):817-28.
28. Elwyn G, Hutchings H, Edwards A, Rapport F, Wensing M, Cheung WY, et al. The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Health Expect. 2005;8(1):34-42.
29. Kriston L, Scholl I, Holze L, Simon D, Harter M. The 9-item shared decision making questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Pat Educ Couns. 2010;80(1):94-9.
30. Martin LR, DiMatteo MR, Lepper HS. Facilitation of patient involvement in care: development and validation of a scale. Behav Med. 2011;27:111-20.
31. Lerman CE, Brody DS, Caputo GC, Smith DG, Lazaro CG, Wolfson HG. Patients' perceived involvement in care scale: relationship to attitudes about illness and medical care. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5(1):29-33.
32. Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P. The control preference scale. Can J Nurs Res. 1997;29:31-43.
33. Barr PJ, Thompson R, Walsh T, Grande SW, Ozanne EM, Elwyn G. The psychometric properties of CollaboRATE: A fast and frugal patient-reported outcome measure of the shared decision-making process. J Med Intern Res. 2014;16(1):e2.
34. Boeije H, Slagt M, van Wesel F. The contribution of mixed methods research to the field of childhood trauma: a narrative review on data integration. J Mix Meth Res. 2013;7(4):347-69.
35. Hill CE, Knox S, Thompson BJ, Williams EN, Hess SA. Consensual qualitative research: an update. J Couns Psychol. 2005;52(2):196-205.
36. Groetz JP, LeCompte MK. Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. New York: Academic Press; 1984.
37. BBoeije H. Analysis in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications, 2010.
38. Patterson ML, Markey MA, Somers JM. Multiple paths to just ends: using narrative interviews and timelines to explore health equity and homelessness. Int J Qual Meth. 2012;11:132-51.
39. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays M. Qualitative research in health care: analysing qualitative data. BMJ. 2000;320:114-6.
40. Green J, Willis K, Hughes E, Small R, Welch N, Gibbs L, et al. Generating best evidence from qualitative research: the role of data analysis. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007;31:545-50.
41. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361-7.
42. Peters E, Diefenbach MA, Hess TM, Vastfjall D. Age differences in dual information-processing modes. Implications for cancer decision making. Cancer. 2008;113(12):3556-67.
43. Van der Heide I, Rademakers J, Schipper M, Droomers M, Sørensen K, Uiters E. Health literacy of Dutch adults: a cross sectional survey. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:179.
44. Hargraves JL, Hays RD, Cleary PD. Psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) 2.0 adult core survey. Health Serv Res. 2003;38(6 Pt 1):1509-27.
45. Lepping P, Stanley T, Turner J. Systematic review of the prevalence of lack of capacity in medical and psychiatric settings. Clin Med. 2015;15(4):337-43.
46. Damman OC, Hendriks M, Sixma HJ. Towards more patient centered health care: A new Consumer Quality index instrument to assess patients' experience with breast care. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(9):1569-77.
47. Booij JC, Zegers M, Evers PM, Hendriks M, Delnoij DM, Rademakers JJ. Improving cancer patient care: development of a generic cancer consumer quality index questionnaire for cancer patients. BMC Cancer. 2013;23(13):203.
48. Stacey S, Kryworunchko J, Belkora J, Davison BJ, Durand MA, Eden KB, et al. Coaching and guidance with patient decision aids: a review of theoretical and empirical evidence. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 suppl 2:S11.
49. Hopmans W, Zwaan L, Senan S, van der Wulp I, Damman OC, Hartemink KJ, et al. Differences between pulmonologists, thoracic surgeons and radiation oncologists in deciding on the treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a binary choice experiment. Radiother Oncol. 2015;115(3):361-6.
50. Chang JY, Senan S, Paul MA, Mehran RJ, Louie AV, Balter P, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus lobectomy for operable stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomized controlled trials. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(6):630-7.
51. Barrett PT, Kline P. The observation to variable ratio in factor analysis. Pers St Group Beh. 1981;1:23-33.
52. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. New York: Hill; 1978.
53. Fagundes CP, Shi Q, Vaporciyan AA, Rice DC, Popat KU, Cleeland CS, et al. Symptom recovery after thoracic surgery: Measuring patient-reported outcomes with the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150(3):613-9.
54. Integral Cancer Center the Netherlands. Available at: www.iknl.nl.
55. Jenkins V, Solis-Trapala I, Langridge C, Catt S, Talbot DC, Fallowfield LJ. What oncologists believe they said and what patients believe they heard: an analysis of phase I trial discussions. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:61-8.
56. Chew LD, Bradley KA, Boyko EJ. Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy. Fam Med. 2004;36:588-94.
57. Chew LD, Griffin JM, Partin MR, Noorbaloochi S, Grill JP, Snyder A, et al. Validation of screening questions for limited health literacy in a large VA outpatient population. J Gen Int Med. 2008;23:561-6.