Effects of evidence-based strategies to reduce the socioeconomic gradient of uptake in the English NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (ASCEND): Four cluster-randomised controlled trials

The Lancet

Volumn 387, Issue 10020, 2016, Pages 751-759

  Wardle, Jane ^a   Von Wagner, Christian ^a   Kralj Hans, Ines ^b   Halloran, Stephen P ^c,d   Smith, Samuel G ^a,e   McGregor, Lesley M ^a   Vart, Gemma ^a   Howe, Rosemary ^f   Snowball, Julia ^c   Handley, Graham ^g   Logan, Richard F ^h   Rainbow, Sandra ⁱ   Smith, Steve ^j   Thomas, Mary C ^a   Counsell, Nicholas ^a   Morris, Steve ^a   Duffy, Stephen W ^e   Hackshaw, Allan ^a   Moss, Sue ^e   Atkin, Wendy ^f   Raine, Rosalind ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL SURREY COUNTY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^e QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^f IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^g QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^h NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ ST MARK S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^j UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL COVENTRY   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MIDDLE AGED; NARRATIVE; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SOCIAL STATUS; UNITED KINGDOM; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; ENGLAND; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; MASS SCREENING; MULTICENTER STUDY; OCCULT BLOOD; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PROCEDURES; REMINDER SYSTEM; SOCIAL CLASS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UTILIZATION; WRITING;

AGED; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CORRESPONDENCE AS TOPIC; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; ENGLAND; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; OCCULT BLOOD; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; REMINDER SYSTEMS; SOCIAL CLASS; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 84959080216     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: 1474547X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01154-X     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. J Ferlay, I Soerjomataram, M Ervik et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 http://globocan.iarc.fr 2013 (accessed Jan 20, 2015).
2. Cancer Research UK Bowel cancer mortality statistics http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/cancerstats/types/bowel/mortality/ 2014 (accessed Jan 20, 2015).
3. S Whyte, J Chilcott, S Halloran Reappraisal of the options for colorectal cancer screening in England Colorectal Dis 14 2012 e547 e561
4. R Maheswaran, T Pearson, H Jordan, D Black Socioeconomic deprivation, travel distance, location of service, and uptake of breast cancer screening in North Derbyshire, UK J Epidemiol Community Health 60 2006 208 212
5. JY Bang, G Yadegarfar, M Soljak, A Majeed Primary care factors associated with cervical screening coverage in England J Public Health (Oxf) 34 2012 532 538
6. RFA Logan, J Patnick, C Nickerson, L Coleman, MD Rutter, C von Wagner for the English Bowel Cancer Screening Evaluation Committee Outcomes of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England after the first 1 million tests Gut 61 2012 1439 1446
7. C von Wagner, A Good, KL Whitaker, J Wardle Psychosocial determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening participation: a conceptual framework Epidemiol Rev 33 2011 135 147
8. LC Kobayashi, J Wardle, C von Wagner Limited health literacy is a barrier to colorectal cancer screening in England: evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing Prev Med 61 2014 100 105
9. Department for Business Innovation & Skills The 2011 skills for life survey: a survey of literacy, numeracy and ICT levels in England www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment-data/file/36000/12-p168-2011-skills-for-life-survey.pdf 2012 (accessed Jan 20, 2015).
10. SR Cole, G Young, D Byrne, J Guy, J Morcom Participation in screening for colorectal cancer based on a faecal occult blood test is improved by endorsement by the primary care practitioner J Med Screen 9 2002 147 152
11. SR Cole, A Smith, C Wilson, D Turnbull, A Esterman, GP Young An advance notification letter increases participation in colorectal cancer screening J Med Screen 14 2007 73 75
12. IT Zajac, AH Whibley, SR Cole et al. Endorsement by the primary care practitioner consistently improves participation in screening for colorectal cancer: a longitudinal analysis J Med Screen 17 2010 19 24
13. NU Ahmed, G Haber, KA Semenya, MK Hargreaves Randomized controlled trial of mammography intervention in insured very low-income women Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19 2010 1790 1798
14. MS Wolf, LM Curtis, K Waite et al. Helping patients simplify and safely use complex prescription regimens Arch Intern Med 171 2011 300 305
15. L Camilloni, E Ferroni, BJ Cendales et al. Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review BMC Public Health 13 2013 464
16. LM McGregor, C von Wagner, G Vart et al. The impact of supplementary narrative-based information on colorectal cancer sceeening beliefs and intention BMC Cancer 15 2015 162
17. CK Palmer, MC Thomas, C von Wagner, R Raine Reasons for non-uptake and subsequent participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study Br J Cancer 110 2014 1705 1711
18. SG Smith, G Vart, MS Wolf et al. How do people interpret information about colorectal cancer screening: observations from a think-aloud study Health Expect 18 2015 703 714
19. SG Smith, MS Wolf, A Obichere, R Raine, J Wardle, C von Wagner The development and testing of a brief ('gist-based') supplementary colorectal cancer screening information leaflet Patient Educ Couns 93 2013 619 625
20. SG Smith, R Raine, A Obichere, MS Wolf, J Wardle, C von Wagner The effect of a supplementary ('gist-based') information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial J Behav Med 38 2015 261 272
21. VF Reyna, CJ Brainerd Fuzzy-trace theory: an interim synthesis Learn Individ Differ 7 1995 1 75
22. General Medical Council Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/ethical-guidance/consent-guidance-index.asp 2008 (accessed Jan 20, 2015).
23. MW Kreuter, MC Green, JN Cappella et al. Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: a framework to guide research and application Ann Behav Med 33 2007 221 235
24. Department for Communities and Local Government Indices of deprivation 2010 http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120919132719/http://www.communities.gov.uk/communities/research/indicesdeprivation/deprivation10/ 2011 (accessed Jan 20, 2015).
25. S Puffer, D Torgerson, J Watson Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomised trials: review of recent trials published in three general medical journals BMJ 327 2003 785 789
26. MJ Campbell, A Donner, N Klar Developments in cluster randomized trials and statistics in medicine Stat Med 26 2007 2 19
27. PJ Huber The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability vol 1 1967 University of California Press Berkeley, CA 221 233
28. H White A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity Econometrica 48 1980 817 830
29. G Lyratzopoulos, MPH Liu, GA Abel, J Wardle, NL Keating The association between fatalistic beliefs and late stage at diagnosis of lung and colorectal cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 24 2015 720 726
30. J Digby, PJ McDonald, JA Strachan, G Libby, RJ Steele, CG Fraser Use of a faecal immunochemical test narrows current gaps in uptake for sex, age and deprivation in a bowel cancer screening programme J Med Screen 20 2013 80 88
31. S Moss, C Mathews, T Day, S Smith, SP Halloran Increased participation in colorectal cancer screening during a pilot of faecal immunochemical test of haemoglobin (FIT) in England Gut 64 2015 A1