Learning selectional preferences for entailment or paraphrasing rules

International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, RANLP

Volumn 2007-January, Issue , 2007, Pages 452-457

  Pennacchiotti, Marco ^b   Roberto, Basili ^a   Cao, Diego De ^a   Marocco, Paolo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Inference rules; Lexical acquisition; LSA; Semantic similarity

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; TEXT PROCESSING;

AUTOMATIC-LEARNING; GEOMETRICAL MODELS; INFERENCE RULES; LEXICAL ACQUISITION; LSA; QUESTION ANSWERING; ROBUST METHODS; SELECTIONAL PREFERENCES; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY; TEXTUAL ENTAILMENT;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 84959063780     PISSN: 13138502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. S. Bayer, J. Burger, L. Ferro, J. Henderson, and A. Yeh. MITRE's submissions to the eu pascal rte challenge. In Proceedings of the 1st Pascal Challenge Workshop, Southampton, UK, 2005.
2. R. B. Haim, I. Dagan, B. Dolan, L. Ferro, D. Giampiccolo, B. Magnini, and I. Szpektor. In B. Magnini and I. Dagan, editors. Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Recognizing Textual Entailment Challenge, Venice, Italy, 2006.
3. S. Harabagiu and A. Hickl. Methods for using textual entailment in open-domain question answering. In Proceedings of ACL 2006, Sydney, Australia, 2006.
4. L. Heyer, S. Kruglyak, and S. Yooseph. Exploring expression data: Identification and analysis of coexpressed genes. Genome Research, (9): 1106-1115, 1999.
5. T. Landauer and S. Dumais. A solution to plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104:211-240, 1997.
6. D. Lin and P. Pantel. DIRT-discovery of inference rules from text. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-01), San Francisco, CA, 2001.
7. A. Olney and Z. Cai. An orthonormal basis for entailment. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, pages 554-559, Menlo Park, CA, May 15-17 2005. AAAI Press.
8. B. Pang, K. Knight, and D. Marcu. Syntax-based alignment of multiple translations: extracting paraphrases and generating new sentences. In Proceedings of HLT/NAACL-03, pages 49-56, Edmonton, Canada, 2003.
9. P. Pantel, R. Bhagat, B. Coppola, T. Chklovski, and E. Hovy. Isp: Learning inferential selectional preferences. In Proceedings of HLT/NAACL 2007, 2007.
10. P. Pantel and D. Lin. Discovering word senses from text. In Proceedings of KDD-02, page 613619, Edmonton, Canada, 2002.
11. P. Resnik. Selection and Information: A Class-Based Approach to Lexical Relationships. PhD thesis, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, 1993.
12. Y. Shinyama, S. Sekine, K. Sudo, and R. Grishman. Automatic paraphrase acquisition from news articles. In Proceedings of HLT-02, San Diego, CA, 2003.
13. K. Sudo, S. Sekine, and R. Grishman. An improved extraction pattern representation model for automatic ie pattern acquisition. In Proceedings of ACL 2003, 2003.
14. I. Szpektor, H. Tanev, I. Dagan, and B. Coppola. Scaling webbased acquisition of entailment relations. In Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Barcellona, Spain, 2004.