On the formalization of invariant mappings for metaphor interpretation

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 109-112

  Agerri, Rodrigo ^a   Barnden, John ^a   Lee, Mark ^a   Wallington, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS;

DEFAULT RULE; DOMAIN INDEPENDENTS; EMBEDDINGS; FORMALISATION; INVARIANT MAPPING; SEMANTICS FRAMEWORK; TRANSFER OF INFORMATION;

MAPPING;

EID: 84959060964     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Nicholas Asher and Alex Lascarides. 2001. The semantics and pragmatics of metaphor. In P. Bouillon and F. Busa, editors, The Language of Word Meaning, pages 262–289. Cambridge University Press.
2. Nicholas Asher and Alex Lascarides. 2003. Logics of Conversation. Cambridge University Press.
3. John Barnden, Sheila Glasbey, Mark Lee, and Alan Wallington. 2002. Reasoning in metaphor understanding: The att-meta approach and system. In 19th Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-2002).
4. John Barnden, Sheila Glasbey, Mark Lee, and Alan Wallington. 2003. Domain-transcending mappings in a system for metaphorical reasoning. In Conference Companion to the 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL 2003), pages 57–61.
5. Jaime Carbonell. 1982. Metaphor: An inescapable phenomenon in natural-language comprehension. In W. Lehnert and M. Ringle, editors, Strategies for Natural Language Processing, pages 415–434. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
6. BrianFalkenhainer, Kenneth Forbus, and Dedre Gentner. 1989. The structure-mapping engine: algorithm and examples. Artificial Intelligence, 41(1):1–63.
7. Jerry Hobbs. 1990. Literature and Cognition. CSLI, Lecture Notes, Stanford.
8. Jerry Hobbs. 1996. An approach to the structure of discourse. In D. Everett, editor, Discourse: Linguistic, Computational and Philosophical Perspectives.
9. James Martin. 1990. A computational model of metaphor interpretation. Academic Press, New York.
10. Srini Narayanan. 1997. KARMA: Knowledge-based action representations for metaphor and aspect. Ph.D. thesis, Computer Science Division, EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley, August.
11. Alan Wallington and John Barnden. 2006. Similarity as a basis for metaphor: Invariant transfer and the role of VNMAs. Technical Report CSRP-06-02, School of Computer Science, Univ. of Birmingham, December.
12. Alan Wallington, John Barnden, Sheila Glasbey, and Mark Lee. 2006. Metaphorical reasoning with an economical set of mappings. Delta, 22(1).