Pronominal anaphora resolution for text summarisation

International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, RANLP

Volumn 2007-January, Issue , 2007, Pages 430-436

  Orəsan, Constantin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anaphora resolution; Automatic summarisation; Evaluation

Indexed keywords

ANAPHORA RESOLUTION; AUTOMATIC SUMMARIZATION; BENEFICIAL EFFECTS; EVALUATION; HIGH ACCURACY METHODS; INFORMATIVENESS; JOURNAL ARTICLES; PRONOMINAL ANAPHORA RESOLUTION; RESOLUTION METHODS; TEXT SUMMARISATION;

EID: 84959057678     PISSN: 13138502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. C. Aone and S. W. Bennett. Evaluating automated and manual acquisition of anaphora resolution rules. In Proceedings of the 33th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'95), pages 122-129, 1995.
2. S. Azzam, K. Humphrey, and R. Gaizauskas. Using coreference chains for text summarisation. In A. Bagga, B. Baldwin, and S. Shelton, editors, Coreference and Its Applications, pages 77-84, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA, June 1999.
3. B. Baldwin. CogNIAC: High precision coreference with limited knowledge and linguistic resources. In R. Mitkov and B. Boguraev, editors, Proceedings of Workshop on Operational Factors in Practical, Robust Anaphora Resolution for Unrestricted Texts, pages 38-45, 1997.
4. B. Baldwin and T. S. Morton. Dynamic coreference-based summarization. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-3), Granada, Spain, June 1998.
5. C. Barbu. Genetic algorithms in anaphora resolution. In T. M. Antonio Branco and R. Mitkov, editors, Proceedings of the 4th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium (DAARC2002), pages 7-12, Lisbon, Portugal, September, 18-20 2002.
6. C. Barbu and R. Mitkov. Evaluation tool for rule-based anaphora resolution methods. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 34-41, Toulouse, France, July 9-11 2001.
7. R. Barzilay and M. Elhadad. Using lexical chains for text summarization. In I. Mani and M. T. Maybury, editors, Advances in Automated Text Summarization, pages 111-121. The MIT Press, 1999.
8. P. B. Baxendale. Man-made index for technical literature - an experiment. I. B. M. Journal of Research and Development, 2(4):354-361, 1958.
9. B. Boguraev and C. Kennedy. Salience-based content characterisation of text documents. In I. Mani and M. T. Maybury, editors, Advances in Automated Text Summarization, pages 99-110. The MIT Press, 1999.
10. S. E. Brennan, M. W. Friedman, and C. J. Pollard. A centering approach to pronouns. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Metting of the ACL, pages 155-162, Stanford, California, June 1987.
11. M. Brunn, Y. Chali, and C. J. Pinchak. Text summarization using lexical chains. In Proceedings of DUC2001 Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, September 13-14 2001.
12. S. H. Corston-Oliver. Beyond string matching and cue phrases: Improving the efficiency and coverage in discourse analysis. In AAAI Spring Symposium on Intelligent Text Summarisation, pages 9-15, Stanford, California, USA, March 23-25 1998.
13. R. L. Donaway, K. W. Drummey, and L. A. Mather. A comparison of rankings produced by summarization evaluation measures. In Proceedings of NAACL-ANLP 2000 Workshop on Text Summarisation, pages 69-78, Seattle, Washington, April 30 2000.
14. H. P. Edmundson. New methods in automatic extracting. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 16(2):264-285, April 1969.
15. N. Ge, J. Hale, and E. Charniak. A statistical approach to anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Very Large Corpora, COLING-ACL'98, pages 161-170, Montreal, Canada, 1998.
16. B. J. Grosz, A. K. Joshi, and S. Weinstein. Centering: A framework for modelling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2):203-225, 1995.
17. M. A. K. Halliday and R. Hasan. Cohesion in English. English Language Series. Longman Group Ltd, 1976.
18. L. Hasler, C. Orəsan, and R. Mitkov. Building better corpora for summarisation. In Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2003, pages 309-319, Lancaster, UK, March, 28-31 2003.
19. M. Hassel. Pronominal resolution in automatic text summarisation. Master's thesis, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, 2000.
20. J. Hobbs. Pronoun resolution. Research report 76-1, City College, City University of New York, 1976.
21. J. Hobbs. Pronoun resolution. Lingua, 44:339-352, 1978.
22. C. Kennedy and B. Boguraev. Anaphora for everyone: pronominal anaphora resolution without a parser. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'96), pages 113-118, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 05-09 1996.
23. J. Kupiec, J. Pederson, and F. Chen. A trainable document summarizer. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM/SIGIR Annual Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 68-73, Seattle, July 09-13 1995.
24. S. Lappin and H. J. Leass. An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution. Computational Linguistics, 20(4):535-562, 1994.
25. C.-Y. Lin. Assembly of topic extraction modules in SUMMARIST. In AAAI Spring Symposium on Intelligent Text Summarisation, pages 44-50, Stanford, California, USA, March 23-25 1998.
26. C.-Y. Lin and E. H. Hovy. Automatic evaluation of summaries using n-gram co-occurrence. In Proceedings of 2003 Language Technology Conference (HLT-NAACL 2003), pages 71-78, Edmonton, Canada, May 27 - June 1 2003.
27. H. P. Luhn. The automatic creation of literature abstracts. IBM Journal of research and development, 2(2):159-165, 1958.
28. I. Mani. Automatic Summarization. Natural Language Processing. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2001.
29. D. Marcu. From discourse structures to text summaries. In I. Mani and M. Maybury, editors, Proceedings of the ACL/EACL'97 Workshop on Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization, pages 82-88, Madrid, Spain, 1997. ACL.
30. R. Mitkov. Robust pronoun resolution with limited knowledge. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'98/ACL'98), pages 867-875, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, August 10-14 1998.
31. R. Mitkov. Anaphora resolution. Longman, 2002.
32. R. Mitkov, R. Evans, and C. Orəsan. A new, fully automatic version of Mitkov's knowledge-poor pronoun resolution method. In Proceedings of CICLing-2002, pages 168-186, Mexico City, Mexico, February 2002.
33. R. Mitkov, R. Evans, C. Orəsan, C. Barbu, L. Jones, and V. Sotirova. Coreference and anaphora: developing annotating tools, annotated resources and annotation strategies. In Proceedings of the Discourse, Anaphora and Reference Resolution Conference (DAARC2000), pages 49-58, Lancaster, UK, 2000.
34. K. Ono, K. Sumita, and S. Miike. Abstract generation based on rhetorical structure extraction. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-94), pages 344-348, Kyoto, Japan, 1994.
35. C. Orəsan. PALinkA: a highly customizable tool for discourse annotation. In Proceedings of the 4th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialog, pages 39-43, Sapporo, Japan, July, 5-6 2003.
36. C. Orəsan. The influence of personal pronouns for automatic summarisation of scientific articles. In Proceedings of the 5th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium, pages 127-132, Furnas, S. Migue, Azores, Protugal, September, 23-24 2004.
37. C. Orəsan. Comparative evaluation of modular automatic summarisation systems using CAST. PhD thesis, University of Wolverhampton, 2006.
38. C. Orəsan, R. Evans, and R. Mitkov. Enhancing preferencebased anaphora resolution with genetic algorithms. In Proceedings of Natural Language Processing - NLP2000, pages 185-195. Springer, 2000.
39. C. D. Paice. The automatic generation of literature abstracts: an approach based on the identification of self-indicating phrases. In R. N. Oddy, C. J. Rijsbergen, and P. W. Williams, editors, Information Retrieval Research, pages 172-191. London: Butterworths, 1981.
40. W. M. Soon, H. T. Ng, and D. C. Y. Lim. A machine learning approach to coreference resolution of noun phrases. Computational Linguistics, 27(2):521-544, 2001.
41. J. Steinberger, M. A. Kabadjov, M. Poesio, and O. Sanchez-Graillet. Improving LSA-based summarization with anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP), pages 1-8, Vancouver, Canada, October 2005.
42. P. Tapanainen and T. Järvinen. A non-projective dependency parser. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference of Applied Natural Language Processing, pages 64-71, Washington D. C., USA, March 31 - April 3 1997.
43. S. Teufel and M. Moens. Summarizing scientific articles: Experiments with relevance and rhetorical status. Computational linguistics, 28(4):409-445, 2002.
44. K. Zechner. Fast generation of abstracts from general domain text corpora by extracting relevant sentences. In COLING - 96, The International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 986-989, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 1996.