Customizable domain analysis

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1799, Issue , 2000, Pages 178-194

  Bayer, Joachim ^a   Muthig, Dirk ^a   Widen, Tanya ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER IESE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Domain analysis; Domain engineering; Product line software engineering

Indexed keywords

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

APPLICATION SPECIFIC; COMPONENT-BASED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; CUSTOMIZABLE; DOMAIN ANALYSIS; DOMAIN ENGINEERING; PRODUCT LINE SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; PRODUCT-LINES; REUSABLE ASSETS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY;

EID: 84959052554     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-40048-6_14     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Arango, G. and Prieto-Diaz, R. (eds.) Domain Analysis Concepts and Research Directions. In Domain Analysis and Software Systems Modeling, pp. 9-31, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1991.
2. Ardis, M. and Weiss, D. Defining Families: The Commonality Analysis. Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 649-650, IEEE Computer Society Press, May 1997.
3. Basili, V., Caldiera, G., and Rombach, D. Experience Factory. Encyclopedia of Software Engineering Volume 1: 469-476, Marciniak, J. ed. John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
4. Bayer, J., Flege, O., Knauber, P., Laqua, R., Muthig, D., Schmid, K., Widen, T., DeBaud, J.M. PuLSE: A methodology to develop software product lines. In Symposium on Software Reusability, May 1999.
5. Bayer, J., Muthig, D., and Widen, T. Support for Domain and Variant Engineering: Diversity/CDA. Submitted for publication, May 1999.
6. DeBaud, J.M., Flege, O., and Knauber, P. PuLSE-DSSA: A Method for the Development of Software Reference Architectures. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Software Architecture Workshop, November 1998.
7. DeBaud, J.M. and Schmid, K. A Systematic Approach to Derive the scope of Software Product Lines. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 34-43, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1999
8. Domain modeling environment. The official web site. http://www.htc.honey-well.com/dome/. April 1999.
9. Frakes, B., Prieto-Diaz, R., and Fox, C. DARE: Domain Analysis and Reuse Environment. In 7th Annual Workshop on Software Reuse, 1995.
10. Gomaa, H., Kerschberg, L., Sugumaran, V., Bosch, C., Tavakoli, I. and O’Hara. L. A knowledge-based software engineering environment for reusable software requirements and architectures. Automated Software Engineering, 3(3,4), pp. 285-307, August 1996.
11. Higgins, J., Tracz, W., and Newton, E. Domain (DOmain Model All Integrated) User Guide. Technical Report ADAGE-LOR-94-06A, Loral Federal Systems, September 1994.
12. Paulk, M., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M., and Weber, C. Capability Maturity Model for Software (Version 1.1). Technical Report CMU/SEI-93-TR-024, February 1993.
13. Potts, C., Takahashi, K., and Anton, A. Inquiry-Based Requirements Analysis. IEEE Software, pp. 21-32, March 1994
14. Software Engineering Institute, Model-Based Software Engineering. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/technology/mbse/is.html, April 25, 1998.
15. Software Productivity Consortium Services Corporation. Reuse Adoption Guidebook, Version 02.00.05, November 1993.
16. Software Productivity Consortium. Reuse-Driven Software Processes Guidebook, Version 02.00.03. Technical Report SPC-92019-CMC, Software Productivity Consortium, November 1993.
17. Software Technology for Adaptable Reliable Systems. Organization Domain Modeling (ODM) Guidebook, Version 2.0. Unisys STARS Technical Report STARS-VC-A025/001/00, Reston VA, June 1996.
18. Tracz, W. and Coglianese, L. Domain-Specific Software Architecture Engineering Process Guidelines, Technical Report ADAGE-IBM-92-02, Loral Federal Systems, 1992.