Parsing the Medline corpus

International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, RANLP

Volumn 2007-January, Issue , 2007, Pages 335-339

  Koster, Cornelis H A ^a   Seutter, Marc ^a   Seibert, Olaf ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Best only parsing; Natural language parsing; Text mining; Weighted attributed grammars

Indexed keywords

FORMAL LANGUAGES; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

ATTRIBUTED GRAMMARS; BEST-ONLY PARSING; DEPENDENCY TRIPLES; EXPERIMENTAL SYSTEM; LITERATURE MINING; MEDLINE; NATURAL LANGUAGE PARSING; SEARCH TERMS; TEXT-MINING; WEIGHTED ATTRIBUTED GRAMMAR;

DATA MINING;

EID: 84959038971     PISSN: 13138502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. [Alako et al, 2005] Blaise T. Alako, A. Veldhoven, S. van Baal, R. Jelier, St. Verhoeven, T. Rullmann, J. Polman and G. Jenster (2005), CoPub Mapper - A Text Mining Tool Based on Co-Publication. www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/6/51/abstract
2. [Clegg and Shepherd, 1996] A. B. Clegg and A. J. Shepherd (2007), Benchmarking natural-language parsers for biological applications using dependency graphs, BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8:24.
3. [Fagan, 1988] J. L. Fagan (1988), Experiments in automatic phrase indexing for document retrieval: a comparison of syntactic and non-syntactic methods, PhD Thesis, Cornell University.
4. [Grootjen and van der Weide, 2004] F. A. Grootjen and T. P. van der Weide (2004), Effectiveness of Index Expressions. NLDB 2004, Springer LNCS 3136 pp. 171-181.
5. [Hearst, 1999] M. A. Hearst (1999), Untangling text data mining. Proc. 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3-10.
6. [Hekkelman and Vriend, 2005] M. L. Hekkelman and G. Vriend (2005), MRS: A fast and compact retrieval system for biological data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 July 1;33(Web Server issue):W766W769. Also http://mrs.cmbi.ru.nl/.
7. [IKNOW search engine] http://www.iknow.be
8. [Jones, 2000] P. A. Jones (2000), Best First Search and Document Processing Applications, Dissertation University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
9. [Koster and Verbruggen, 2002] C. H. A. Koster and E. Verbruggen (2002), The AGFL Grammar Work Lab, Proceedings FREENIX/Usenix, pp 13-18.
10. [Koster et al., 2006] C. H. A. Koster, O. Seibert and M. Seutter (2006), The PHASAR Search Engine. Proceedings NLDB 2006, Springer LNCS 3999, pp 141-152.
11. [Lewis, 1992] Lewis, D. D. (1992), An evaluation of phrasal and clustered representations on a text categorization task. Proceedings ACM SIGIR'92.
12. [Lin, 1995] D. Lin (1995), A dependency-based method for evaluating broad-coverage parsers. Proceedings IJCAI-95, pp. 1420-1425.
13. [Matsuzaki et al, 2007] Matsuzaki, Takuya, Yusuke Miyao and Jun'ichi Tsujii. Efficient HPSG Parsing with Supertagging and CFG-filtering. Proceedings IJCAI'07, 1671-1676.
14. [Melčuk, 1988] I. A. Melčuk. Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 1988.
15. [Shatkay and Feldman, 2003] H. Shatkay and R. Feldman (2003), Mining the Biomedical Literature in the Genomic Era: An Overview. Journal of computational biology, 10, 6, 821-855.
16. [Strzalkowski, 1995] T. Strzalkowski (1995), Natural Language Information Retrieval, Information Processing and Management, 31(3), pp. 397-417.