Marine trade-offs: Comparing the benefits of off-shore wind farms and marine protected areas

Energy Economics

Volumn 55, Issue , 2016, Pages 127-134

  Karlõševa, Aljona ^a   Nõmmann, Sulev ^a   Nõmmann, Tea ^a   Urbel Piirsalu, Evelin ^a   Budziński, Wiktor ^b   Czajkowski, Mikołaj ^b   Hanley, Nick ^c  

^a STOCKHOLM ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Discrete choice experiment; Latent class mixed logit; Marine protected areas; Off shore wind energy; Q25; Q28; Q42; Q48; Q51; Q58; Renewable energy; Willingness to pay space

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; MARINE PROTECTED AREA; MIXED LOGIT; OFF-SHORE WIND ENERGY; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

WIND POWER;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; OFFSHORE STRUCTURE; PROTECTED AREA; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; TRADE-OFF; WILLINGNESS TO PAY; WIND FARM; WIND POWER;

ESTONIA; EUROPE;

EID: 84958957549     PISSN: 01409883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.12.022     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aanesen M., Armstrong C., Czajkowski M., Falk-Petersen J., Hanley N., Navrud S. Willingness to pay for unfamiliar public goods: preserving cold-water corals in Norway. Ecol. Econ. 2015, 112:53-67.
2. Bergmann A., Colombo S., Hanley N. Rural versus urban preferences for renewable energy developments. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65(3):616-625.
3. Bliemer M.C.J., Rose J.M., Hess S. Approximation of Bayesian efficiency in experimental choice designs. J. Choice Model. 2008, 1(1):98-127.
4. Böhringer C., Rutherford T.F., Tol R.S.J. THE EU 20/20/2020 targets: an overview of the EMF22 assessment. Energy Econ. 2009, 31(Suppl. 2(0)):S268-S273.
5. Campbell D., Hensher D.A., Scarpa R. Bounding WTP distributions to reflect the 'actual' consideration set. J. Choice Model. 2014, 11(0):4-15.
6. Carson R.T., Czajkowski M. The discrete choice experiment approach to environmental contingent valuation. Handbook of choice modelling 2014, Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA. S. Hess, A. Daly (Eds.).
7. Czajkowski M., Budziński W. An insight into the numerical simulation bias - a comparison of efficiency and performance of different types of quasi Monte Carlo simulation methods under a wide range of experimental conditions. Environmental Choice Modelling Conference, Copenhagen 2015.
8. ESOMAR ICC/ESOMAR International Code on Market and Social Research 2008.
9. Furness R.W., Wade H.M., Masden E.A. Assessing vulnerability of marine bird populations to offshore wind farms. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 119(0):56-66.
10. Gillespie R., Bennett J. Non use economic values of marine protected areas in the South-West Marine Region. Research Report 107582 2010, Environmental Economics Research Hub, Australian National University.
11. Greene W.H., Hensher D.A. Revealing additional dimensions of preference heterogeneity in a latent class mixed multinomial logit model. Appl. Econ. 2012, 45(14):1897-1902.
12. Hanley N., Barbier E.B. Pricing Nature. Cost-Benefit Analysis and Environmental Policy 2009, Edward Elgar, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA.
13. Hanley N., Hynes S., Patterson D., Jobstvogt N. Economic valuation of marine and coastal ecosystems: is it currently fit for purpose?. J. Ocean Coast. Econ. 2015, 2. (Article 1).
14. Hess S., Stathopoulos A., Campbell D., O'Neill V., Caussade S. It's not that I don't care, I just don't care very much: confounding between attribute non-attendance and taste heterogeneity. Transportation 2013, 40(3):583-607.
15. Kosenius A.-K., Ollikainen M. Valuation of environmental and societal trade-offs of renewable energy sources. Energ Policy 2013, 62(0):1148-1156.
16. Krueger A.D., Parsons G.R., Firestone J. Valuing the visual disamenity of offshore wind power projects at varying distances from the shore: an application on the Delaware Shoreline. Land Econ. 2011, 87(2):268-283.
17. Ladenburg J. Attitudes towards offshore wind farms-the role of beach visits on attitude and demographic and attitude relations. Energ Policy 2010, 38(3):1297-1304.
18. Liebe U., Glenk K., Oehlmann M., Meyerhoff J. Does the use of mobile devices (tablets and smartphones) affect survey quality and choice behaviour in web surveys?. J. Choice Model. 2015, 14:17-31.
19. Lindhjem H., Navrud S. Are Internet surveys an alternative to face-to-face interviews in contingent valuation?. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70(9):1628-1637.
20. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualititative choice behaviour. Frontiers in Econometrics 1974, 105-142. Academic Press, New York, NY. P. Zarembka (Ed.).
21. Menegaki A.N., Olsen S.B., Tsagarakis K.P. Towards a common standard - a reporting checklist for web-based stated preference valuation surveys. Webdatanet Conference 2015, Salamanca, Spain.
22. Meyerhoff J., Ohl C., Hartje V. Landscape externalities from onshore wind power. Energ Policy 2010, 38(1):82-92.
23. Olsen E.M., Fonseca L., Goñi R., Johnson D., Katsanevakis S., Macpherson E., (Chair) E.M.O., Pelletier D., Rabaut M., Ribeiro M.C., Weaver P., Zaharia T. Achieving ecologically coherent MPA networks in Europe: science needs and priorities. Marine Board Position Paper 18 2013, European Marine Board, Ostend, Belgium. K. Larkin, M. Evrard, A. Carbonnière (Eds.).
24. Scarpa R., Rose J.M. Design efficiency for non-market valuation with choice modelling: how to measure it, what to report and why. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2008, 52(3):253-282.
25. Train K.E., Weeks M. Discrete Choice Models in Preference Space and Willingness-to-pay Space 2005, 1-16. Springer, Dordrecht. S. R., A. A. (Eds.).
26. Wallmo K., Edwards S. Estimating non-market values of marine protected areas: a latent class modeling approach. Mar. Resour. Econ. 2008, 23(3):301-323.
27. Wattage P., Glenn H., Mardle S., Van Rensburg T., Grehan A., Foley N. Economic value of conserving deep-sea corals in Irish waters: a choice experiment study on marine protected areas. Fish. Res. 2011, 107(1-3):59-67.
28. Westerberg V., Jacobsen J.B., Lifran R. The case for offshore wind farms, artificial reefs and sustainable tourism in the French mediterranean. Tour. Manag. 2013, 34(0):172-183.
29. Xiong Y., Mannering F.L. The heterogeneous effects of guardian supervision on adolescent driver-injury severities: a finite-mixture random-parameters approach. Transp. Res. B Methodol. 2013, 49(0):39-54.
30. Yoo J., Ready R.C. Preference heterogeneity for renewable energy technology. Energy Econ. 2014, 42(0):101-114.