From msc-2000 to uml 2.0 —the future of sequence diagrams

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2078, Issue , 2001, Pages 38-51

  Haugen, Øystein ^a  

^a Ericsson Research NorARC   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SEMANTICS;

COLLABORATION DIAGRAM; CONCEPTUAL MODEL; META MODEL; SEQUENCE CHARTS; SEQUENCE DIAGRAMS; UML 2.0; UML COLLABORATIONS;

GRAPHIC METHODS;

EID: 84958956531     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-48213-X_3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. ITU (1999). Z.120. Message Sequence Charts (MSC). O. Haugen. Geneva, ITU-T: 126.
2. OMG (2000). OMG Unified Modeling Language, Object Management Group.
3. Haugen, Ø. (1999). Converging MSC and UML Sequence Diagrams. Beyond the Standard UML’99-The Unified Modeling Language, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
4. OMG (2000). Request For Proposal. UML 2.0 Superstructure RFP. Needham, MA, USA, Object Management Group.RFP ad/2000-08-09
5. ITU (1996). Z.120. Message Sequence Charts (MSC). E. Rudolph. Geneva, ITU-T: 78.
6. Haugen, O. (1997). The MSC-96 Distillery. SDL’97 Time for Testing. SDL, MSC and Trends., Evry, Paris, France, North-Holland.
7. Rensink, A. and H. Wehrheim (1994). Weak sequential composition in process algebra. CONCUR’94, Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on ConcurrencyTheory, Uppsala, Sweden, Springer-Verlag.
8. Damm, W. and D. Harel (1999). LSCs: Breathing Life into Message Sequence Charts. FMOODS’99.
9. Schieferdecker, I., J. Grabowski, et al. (2000). TSC-Test Sequence Charts. Sophia Antipolis, ETSI.Draft recommendation.
10. Gamma, E., R. Helm, et al. (1994). Design Patterns. Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software, Addison-Wesley.
11. Reniers, M. A. (1998). Message Sequence Chart: Syntax and Semantics. PhD Thesis., Departement of Computer Science. Eindhoven, Eindhoven Universityof Technology